Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hating the police

And if crow paid himself say 50% more than his average member than i would consider that more than fair

He's elected by the members, and they have a full committee where this stuff is all agreed. If members didn't think he did the job he was there for very well, or he was paid too much, then they'd leave or want him ousted.

Now if only Unison could get a leader with a backbone like Crow's.
 
I don't think union leaders should be paid large salaries. I think their salaries should place them in the same position economically as their members.

But I don't think this renders trade unionism redundant or corrupt. When union members strike, they do so to defend their own jobs, having had the democratic opportunity to so. The union leader has nothing to do with it.

I never saw Scargills gaff on Through The Keyhole. I'm imagining North Korean chic with a shade of Caesescu.

I would say the level of honesty amongs trade union officials is on a par with Pickmans view of councillors
 
He's elected by the members, and they have a full committee where this stuff is all agreed. If members didn't think he did the job he was there for very well, or he was paid too much, then they'd leave or want him ousted.

Now if only Unison could get a leader that stood up to the government.
like Scargill you mean?
 
like Scargill you mean?

Well at least he tried to do something in the face of Thatchers attack. You were a miner and yet you've turned into a Tory loving capitalist like the ones that fucked over the mines and the mining community.

Short on those 'socialist' principles you were going on about on another thread.
 
Well at least he tried to do something in the face of Thatchers attack. You were a miner and yet you've turned into a Tory loving capitalist like the ones that fucked over the mines and the mining community.

Short on those 'socialist' principles you were going on about on another thread.
 
I would say the level of honesty amongs trade union officials is on a par with Pickmans view of councillors

Depends on the union, on whether the officials can be held to account (even better, elected or recalled) by the rank and file or whether they answer to the union bureaucracy.

Even so. A union is two things - it's membership and it's bureaucracy. When unions strike, it is the members who choose to go out; it is the members who lose wages; it is the members who benefit if the strike works. It is ordinary working class people defending themselves. Why this is undermined by (legitimate) concerns about the accountability of union officials us beyond me.
 
I heard a fairly good defence of trade union leaders high wages.

They argued once Crow, for example, isn't the Gen Sec of the RMT who will employ him? They argued that the leadership should get a high wage so that they can live of it after the leave office.
 
Well at least he tried to do something in the face of Thatchers attack. You were a miner and yet you've turned into a Tory loving capitalist like the ones that fucked over the mines and the mining community.

Short on those 'socialist' principles you were going on about on another thread.

What scargill did was to mount a doomed attack on an entrenched position and in doing so effectively destroyed the NUM and in the longer run the trade union movement,I spent nearly a year on strike thanks to that idiots blind egotism
 
If you can justify wages of £100k plus for one job, you can justify high wages for any job, imo. Bankers don't deserve such wages; politicians don't; company directors don't; so neither do union bosses.

Do you support the right to strike Coley? Or only in certain circumstances etc?
 
I heard a fairly good defence of trade union leaders high wages.

They argued once Crow, for example, isn't the Gen Sec of the RMT who will employ him? They argued that the leadership should get a high wage so that they can live of it after the leave office.

Once elected they are there until they retire so why pay them more than the average wage of their members? with the same retirement benefits?
 
What scargill did was to mount a doomed attack on an entrenched position and in doing so effectively destroyed the NUM and in the longer run the trade union movement,I spent nearly a year on strike thanks to that idiots blind egotism

No, Thatchers neo-liberalism destroyed mining. But you Tory anti-union lot always like to misdirect your blame.

And hey, you're 'all right jack' now. You must have got on your bike like the good Tebbitt told you to (after they'd demolished your livelihood and community).
 
If you can justify wages of £100k plus for one job, you can justify high wages for any job, imo. Bankers don't deserve such wages; politicians don't; company directors don't; so neither do union bosses.

Do you support the right to strike Coley? Or only in certain circumstances etc?
Of course I do but only if more than 50 % of the workforce votes for it, as for bankers and their ilk they should have a masssive pay cut, now we have unions with large amounts of shares in those banks, why are those unions not agitating for bankers pay cuts?
 
Without wanting to get into the miners strike, and baring in mind Scargills politics are shit, it's hard to see what alternatives were open to the miners, the NUM or Scargill. But anyway.
 
I heard a fairly good defence of trade union leaders high wages.

They argued once Crow, for example, isn't the Gen Sec of the RMT who will employ him? They argued that the leadership should get a high wage so that they can live of it after the leave office.
Don't they end up in the Lords?

Yes the first time, co-opted this time.
That's an interesting form of democracy, get yourself elected once then get op-opted.
 
Cops are so gay.

Picture-242-600x338.png


The one in the middle is totally checking out some stormtrooper-of-the-new-world-order batty!
 
Of course I do but only if more than 50 % of the workforce votes for it, as for bankers and their ilk they should have a masssive pay cut, now we have unions with large amounts of shares in those banks, why are those unions not agitating for bankers pay cuts?

Many unions are, but as i've already made clear I'm not interested in defending union leaders or their salaries. It isn't the union leaders who vote to, or go out on, strike.

Why 50%? What share of the vote did you get when you were elected? 15%?
 
No, Thatchers neo-liberalism destroyed mining. But you Tory anti-union lot always like to misdirect your blame.

And hey, you're 'all right jack' now. You must have got on your bike like the good Tebbitt told you to (after they'd demolished your livelihood and community).
Nope i havent moved, just built a business out of what I did on a voluntary basis when I was a miner, Scargill walked straight into thatchers trap, going on strike in march when the country had a full stockpile of coal, an intelligent move would have been a work to rule until coal stocks were lower but intelligence and scargill is an oxymoron
 
if you're elected you're there till you retire?

so all unions only have elections when their bosses die ... er lolwut
 
Well I never knew that, I assume that every decision they take has to be ratified by some elected body further up the line, do parish councils have control of there own budget?
Yes, its called a precept. and co-opted councillors have to stand for election once they come around
 
buggered if i can remember

Less than 50% though in all likelihood - the vast majority won't bother voting. Second time round you got in without any democratic mandate whatsoever.

So why should working people seeking to defend their jobs be held up to a higher standard of democracy than glorified neighbourhood watch like you?
 
Back
Top Bottom