aqua said:that night with me you bees skim and derv at the stone circle was my fave bit of the lot, and bees' too I think
utterly perfect
editor said:He went to show me what bands he was seeing later on, and what does he pull out of his pocket? Crispy's legendary u75 Glasto cheat sheet!
Sunray said:Blimy! I shot an email to Funktion One to complain about the sound system being so rubbish, not expecting a reply, but I did get one!
aqua said:how can the official guides miss so many of the stages? it's fucking useless!
I still hurt
moose said:What was wrong with the TTT?
Yeah Receptacle for the Respectable went BOOM!WOOSH!editor said:Mind you, the bass on the Other Stage was pretty mighty. When the Super Furries cranked it up, the boom nearly knocked me over.
aqua said:I never looked at the mini guide one (as we lost ours on wed ) but the A5 sized one was useless at anything other than the main stages. Why? *sends grumpy faced looks to the people who made that decision*
Skim said:The Guardian mini guide has to miss a lot of stuff because it's such a small size and a bugger to edit.
But there was no excuse for the larger guides – they should have been listing a load more than they did. IIRC there weren't any official listings for the dance lounge, where I really wanted to know what was on. And why didn't anyone put up a timetable of what's on in those dance tents, like you'd put up a list of DJs by the DJ booth in a club?
William of Walworth said:Everything will be even better next year -- in the hot sunshine!
but only if you could remember which section, I meant the centre pages where it was listed more like crispys guideSunray said:Eh? Did you read it? It had every single stage's running order right down to the pubs small tents and was reasonably accurate?
moose said:What was wrong with the TTT?
newbie said:dunno, it just wasn't quite it. All the white cups gave a subtly different message than the ramshackle collection they used to have, and making chai by putting a pinch of powder in a cup and then lobbing in a teabag just doesn't seem likely to catch on.
Skim said:Yes, because I will be going to Womad instead
I've started knitting a pair of ethnic pantaloons to get me in the mood
William of Walworth said:Top marks for :
1. Sweeping generalisation
2. Cliche-recycling derivativeness -- Telegraph style!
(take lessons from jaed though -- you left out 'Jemima' and 'Tarquin' )
firky said:Its good to know there is always someone more fucked than yourself at a festival
belboid said:oh come on, it was way better than that fake stone circle, erected and adored by morons. it would be way better of that thing was ripped out and replaced by a proper replica of stonehenge made out of portaloo's - an actually semi-appropriate updating of an ancient tradition, rather than some simple minded copying of it (that entirely misses the point of why such circles were erected in the first place).
William of Walworth said:
Surely you jest? (WOMAD is excellent for kids though so )
William of Walworth said:Bit in bold. I agree they MUST have a rethink, at the very least as far as traffic management is concerned, but the licence now granted -- at least in terms of numbers -- is for the next 5 years I think ... or was it to 2010?
Stig said:We just looked through the back listings in the A5 one for the small stages, and wrote what was good from there into the main listings in the middle, wherever there was a gap.
So under Avalon 3pm it would say something unintelligible playing, completely different stage, 3:30pm, etc.
worked for us.
We didn't use Crispy's cheatsheet much in the end, as it was way too big and unwieldy. Laminating it was a mistake. Ah well. It seemed like such a good idea at the time...
Mr Retro said:I'm not quite sure what you're on about but I was being (semi) serious! I wanted to go to my first Glasto this year but nothing gets in the way of Ascot. And at least one other person on the thread was effected.
Glad it clashed now though.
Skim said:No, not joking, Womad is a festival I'd love to go back to again – I'd go again this year like a shot if I had the money.
I just don't want to do Glastonbury with my son – even if the weather's better, it's still such hard work because of the sheer size of the site. Womad's looking a better option because it's probably going to have nicer weather and it's more manageable.
But that's next year. This year we've still got Lovebox/Lambeth/Rise/Notting Hill to look forward to
don't forget the one we spent all weekend trying to persuade you to come toSkim said:No, not joking, Womad is a festival I'd love to go back to again – I'd go again this year like a shot if I had the money.
I just don't want to do Glastonbury with my son – even if the weather's better, it's still such hard work because of the sheer size of the site. Womad's looking a better option because it's probably going to have nicer weather and it's more manageable.
But that's next year. This year we've still got Lovebox/Lambeth/Rise/Notting Hill to look forward to
aqua said:don't forget the one we spent all weekend trying to persuade you to come to
JTG said:I realise that, I just question the wisdom of that decision. It seems to me that they're dicing with disaster in some respects and that MDC need to consider what is genuinely viable and safe rather than what will continue to economically benefit the area.
Oxfam do provide feedback I believe, though what difference it makes I know not.
pm sentSkim said:Oh yeah, that one.
*scratches head*
What was it called again?