Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Finsbury Park Terror Attack

You can wonder all you like, but unless you explain what appears to be particularly nasty insinuations of paedophilia - and explain why you've brought them up in a thread about such a serious topic - then you're going to be banned for disruptive conduct.

So kindly now explain yourself.

Where have I done such a thing? Maybe you should read the Oscar Wilde thread and defence - with PM's contribution in respect of age fluidity.
 
Where have I done such a thing? Maybe you should read the Oscar Wilde thread and defence - with PM's contribution in respect of age fluidity.
Then explain clearly what you meant by your comment, and why you brought it up in a thread about a terrorist incident. Absolute last chance because I'm losing patience with your prevarication.
 
Given that I've apologised to PM in the past here - you might want to reconsider your apparent virtue signalling.

Virtue signalling? To Pickman's? He might prefer a smoke signal caused by someone throwing me on the fire.

Virtue signalling against paedophilia. Im against child abuse.

Praise me oh urban forum members.
 
This thread has already been taken way off topic, so I'd be grateful if people kept to the topic of this terrorist attack and I'll deal with B&P. Thank you.
 
Really? No I didn't - where is that specific accusation and wording? Don't try and be clever - you have made a number of unfounded accusations towards me in the past based on no evidence except your assumptions - and some kind of assumed authority based on your position and intersectionality and some form of alleged 'authenticity'.
Allegedly.

Trying to be clever? :D This is the problem with you lad you THINK you are clever and you seriously are not. You are a prize plum and you can't help but try to adopt some pathetically imagined, intellectualised authority based on jack shit as I can see.

There is nothing wrong with my reading of you. You are transparent, a ten-a-penny twit that posts bilge, like you are trying to defend today. Cue you postinng more gobbledygook because plain speaking isn't something you can manage with this ridiculous social scientist/anthropological persona you are trying to sell. The worst Victorian kind at that, and you don't even realise it.
 
Last edited:
Anyway. Terrorist incident. Important topic. Can we talk about that and I'll deal with B&P when he replies to my request for clarification.
 
Trying to be clever? :D This is the problem with you lad you THINK you are clever and your seriously are not. You are a prize plum and you can't help but try to adopt some pathetically imagined, intellectualised authority based on jack shit as I can see.

There is nothing wrong with my reading of you. You are transparent, a ten-a-penny twit that posts bilge, like you are trying to defend today. Cue you postinng more gobbledygook because plain speaking isn't something you can manage with this ridiculous social scientist/anthropological persona you are trying to sell. The worst Victorian kind at that, and you don't even realise it.

Dear God, the irony. Best leave you alone to continue in your confusion and self-professed authenticity then. Socially constructed too.

:facepalm:
 
Dear God, the irony. Best leave you alone to continue in your confusion and self-professed authenticity then. Socially constructed too.

:facepalm:

On top of everything else this crap you are coming out with is on a loop too. This is you back in Aug 2016:

"So here we have the 'authenticity' position stated clearly, with reference to gender and (presumably) colour/race/ethnicity/phenotype (delete and use as appropriate according to the positional and situational axis).:"

In response to same commenter. Piss off.
 
You going to try and send me there personally? I doubt that.
Did you ever explain how you got from a reply of mine on another thread - a reply to someone else, btw, so you don't even have any argument on that score with which to defend yourself - did you ever explain satisfactorily how you went from that to your accusation of paedophilia above?
 
Did you ever explain how you got from a reply of mine on another thread - a reply to someone else, btw, so you don't even have any argument on that score with which to defend yourself - did you ever explain satisfactorily how you went from that to your accusation of paedophilia above?

Was that the accusation I made explicitly? Or are you offering a window in to your psyche?

Just to be clear, before you (and your friends) start complaining to the moderators.
 
‘The fun will continue this August.

‘There will be rivers of blood flowing down the streets — I will make sure of this. None of you vermin will survive. I mean who would survive being gassed, or beheaded, or blown up.’

Another message demanded the mosque pay £18,445.17 to repair any damage the van suffered when it mowed down victims. T

The postcard read: ‘Mr Osborne was not insured unfortunately and in these times of austerity we all need as much cash as possible.’


Finsbury Park mosque sent threatening letters promising 'rivers of blood'
 
Handwritten death threats sent to at least three London mosques

Counter-terrorism police are investigating after handwritten death threats were sent to at least three London mosques.

Police have launched a probe into the menacing letters, one of which contained white powder and was sent to a Muslim primary school.

Another threatened an attack which would "cleanse" London.

The notes were sent by post to the Forest Gate mosque, the Coventry Cross mosque in Bromley-by-Bow and the Ramadan mosque in Dalston.
 
Trial is on, handwritten note found in van is quite, err, something hideous with all the usual tropes gathered conveniently together.

Man 'wanted to kill Muslims in van attack'

One part read: "Don't people get it, this is happening up and down our Green and pleasant land.

"Ferrel [feral] inbred raping muslim men hunting in packs preying on our children, this will be coming to a town near you soon, it most probably has, get back to the desert, you raping inbred bastards & climb back on ya camels."

The note ended: "Well Folkes gotta go busy day today. Remember peaceful vigils only & please dont look back in anger, God Save the Queen."

It also branded Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn a "terrorist sympathiser" and attacked London Mayor Sadiq Khan and singer Lily Allen, the prosecutor added.

Mr Osborne's partner, Sarah Andrews, described him as a "loner and a functioning alcoholic" with an "unpredictable temperament", Mr Rees added.

He had become "obsessed" with Muslims in the weeks leading up to the incident after watching BBC drama Three Girls, about the Rochdale grooming scandal, Ms Andrews had said.
 
how fucking long did it take em to find the note!

Mr Osborne planned to make "a public statement by killing Muslims", knowing that his handwritten note would be recovered, Mr Rees added.

Although Mr Osborne was not charged with a terrorist offence, Mr Rees said "the note and the comments he made after his detention establish that this act of extreme violence was, indeed, an act of terrorism".
 
Messages sent by Tommy Robinson to Finsbury Park terror suspect revealed in court

Mr Osborne received at least two direct Twitter messages from Tommy Robinson, the far-right former EDL leader whose real name is Stephen Yaxley Lennon, the court has heard

The first direct message from Mr Robinson, concerned the Manchester attack.
Read to the court by Mr Rees, it said: "Dear Darren...What Salman Abedi did is not the beginning and it won’t be the end. There is a nation within a nation forming just beneath the surface of the UK...built on hatred, violence and Islam."

The message alleged Abedi's local mosque had a Sharia court, hosted radical preachers and had not be closed down, adding: "Politicians have failed to take the necessary steps to keep us safe.
It has now been left to us, the ordinary people of the UK, to step up and say ‘no more’."

The message invited Mr Osborne to join a silent protest march which Mr Robinson's message would be "impossible to ignore".

The second direct Twitter message from Tommy Robinson to Mr Osborne came on 14 June and detailed the campaign for 'justice' for a woman whose rapists were not prosecuted, the court has heard.

"Dear Darren, we know about he terrible crimes committed against [name redacted] of Sunderland...police let the suspects go and why?
It is because the suspects are refugees from Syria and Iraq, it’s a national outrage…I know you will be there for her and we will get her the justice she deserves."

The message was requesting money to pay a lawyer to pursue the case.

Mr Osborne directly communicated with the deputy leader of Britain First, Jayda Fransen, the court has heard.
Mr Rees said he received a 'direct message' from Ms Fransen on the day he joined Twitter on 3 J
"Hot on the heels of receiving that message on Twitter from Jayda Fransen there’s the London Bridge attack," he added.
In the hours after that attack, Mr Osborne repeatedly searched for more information on Ms Fransen, read her tweets, and looked for information on the killing of Christians in the Phillipines.
 
Back
Top Bottom