And you just know that this will be cited as evidence he was a spook asset by the tinfoilhattery crowd.No tweets, no replies, no likes, no profile pic, a username that appears to include a mobile phone number. And he follows Zoella.
Either this is someone who doesn't use twitter or it was set up by someone else.
A shoeing, a leathering, a damned good thrashing!
This is the internet so posturing is, obviously, a given. As to your apparent point - we have spoken via pm so I'll ignore the suggestion. Out of respect for you as an individual, and your (generally) well thought out posts here. I really have no desire to be rude to you VP, in any way.
Bnp would pay good money for that
No one else has suggested a child's involvement. You might want to think carefully before your next post.Depending on the age of the child invoved, I supect you might too.
No one else has suggested a child's involvement. You might want to think carefully before your next post.
Maybe you should explain what you meant by your last post.You ought to think carefully too. Maybe you should place me on ignore and I'll do the same (at least as far as U75 is involved).
Depending on the age of the child invoved, I supect you might too.
It means he's going to hide in the shrubbery outside your front gate with a zoom lens.Maybe you should explain what you meant by your last post.
And what's this 'at least as far as u75 is involved' meant to be?
A shrubbery?It means he's going to hide in the shrubbery outside your front gate with a zoom lens.
I think you just used your last chance.Depending on the age of the child invoved, I supect you might too.
It means he's going to hide in the shrubbery outside your front gate with a zoom lens.
I think you just used your last chance.
It is a cross-thread thing. Something that often gets used by some individuals here (despite the rules against it).
Yeh? But you're still reluctant to spell out what you meant, or which thread it's crossed from.It is a cross-thread thing. Something that often gets used by some individuals here (despite the rules against it).
Please explain yourself clearly before posting anything else.Depending on the age of the child invoved, I supect you might too.
Please explain yourself clearly before posting anything else.
And that as well if you don't mind. I've not got a fecking clue what the reference is to?You found your biscuit yet?
Marek Zakrocki, 48, of Alexandra Avenue, Rayners Lane, was charged with multiple offences on Sunday (June 25) after the "hate crime".
He is accused of attempted murder, racially aggravated criminal damage, racially aggravated section 4 public order, drink driving, possession of an offensive weapon in a public place, possession of a bladed article in a public place, aggravated taking and driving away, assault by beating and racially aggravated assault by beating.
There are club biscuits. And there are penguin biscuits. But there are no club penguin biscuits.See, this is why we really need to get them to re-open Club Penguin.
Please explain yourself clearly before posting anything else.
Depending on the age of the child invoved, I supect you might too.
So you are calling him a nonce and admitting you are too? Eh?
Absolutely not - but then you do like throwing around labels when it suits you.
I am reflecting your own labelling/insinuations back to you you twit. You accused him of being a nonce and your post implies you would also consider it too depending on the age of the child. If you didn't mean to write that perhaps you should think more carefully about what you post. Arsehole.
You can wonder all you like, but unless you explain what appears to be particularly nasty insinuations of paedophilia - and explain why you've brought them up in a thread about such a serious topic - then you're going to be banned for disruptive conduct.I do wonder why you have chosen now to involve yourself in this thread - after all the insults have been flying around without any prior intercession from the Moderators - including you?
TooReally? No I didn't - where is that specific accusation and wording? Don't try and be clever - you have made a number of unfounded accusations towards me in the past based on no evidence except your assumptions - and some kind of assumed authority based on your position and intersectionality and some form of alleged 'authenticity'.
Allegedly.