Finsbury Park Terror Attack

[ddraig]

My impression is that that's what normally happens with the social media accounts of high-profile murderers. But what's the reason for thinking this is the guy's account? Seems sus that it was set up in June 2017.

he's not touted as a high profile murderer tho is he
what's sus about it?

 

[gentlegreen]

He's being followed by all manner of journos ...

 

[Raheem]

he's not touted as a high profile murderer tho is he

Wut?

what's sus about it?

Because June 2017 doesn't preclude the account being post hoc.

 

[Pickman's model]

My impression is that that's what normally happens with the social media accounts of high-profile murderers. But what's the reason for thinking this is the guy's account? Seems sus that it was set up in June 2017.

perhaps he realised he didn't have a twitter a/c like all the big boy murderers and set one up and never got round to using it, and as soon as he was in custody remembered that he'd forgotten to delete it

 

[Raheem]

perhaps he realised he didn't have a twitter a/c like all the big boy murderers and set one up and never got round to using it, and as soon as he was in custody remembered that he'd forgotten to delete it

Perhaps or perhaps not.

 

[Pickman's model]

Perhaps or perhaps not.

perhaps you shouldn't worry to much about it

 

[Fozzie Bear]

Wut?



Because June 2017 doesn't preclude the account being post hoc.

It may or may not be real, but it's a bit too convenient that he set up an account in June and followed a bunch of far right nutjobs, some celebrities and nobody who is an actual mate?

Perhaps Twitter will oblige with a blue tick...

 

[ddraig]

halfway down this page
Finsbury Park attack suspect named as Cardiff resident Darren Osborne

Osborne also appears to have a Twitter account, which he has never used to send his own tweets, instead monitoring 32 other users, including Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, the leaders of the far right party Britain First. Its mission statement states: “We will restore Christianity as the bedrock and foundation of our national life as it has been for the last one thousand years.”

 

[ddraig]

Wut?



Because June 2017 doesn't preclude the account being post hoc.

is he being called a high profile murderer?
so what?

 

[Raheem]

perhaps you shouldn't worry to much about it

Perhaps.

 

[Pickman's model]

Perhaps.

but perhaps not.

 

[Raheem]

is he being called a high profile murderer?
so what?

I asked a really simple question. Is there any reason to think the account is actually his? There's isn't? Great, thanks.

 

[ddraig]

I asked a really simple question. Is there any reason to think the account is actually his? There's isn't? Great, thanks.

by the same token is there any reason to think the account isn't his?

 

[Raheem]

by the same token is there any reason to think the account isn't his?

Have I not covered that?

 

[danny la rouge]

this is the scumbag twitter account
Darren Osborne (@DarrenO96801499) on Twitter

No tweets, no replies, no likes, no profile pic, a username that appears to include a mobile phone number. And he follows Zoella.

Either this is someone who doesn't use twitter or it was set up by someone else.

 

[Corax]

He's being followed by all manner of journos ...

And some bloke who's proudly got his sister pregnant.

 

[danny la rouge]

Some joker has added him to a list of "Friends of Daesh", though.

 

[danny la rouge]

The list curator:

 

[bimble]

 

[danny la rouge]

"Darren Osborne, 47, charged with terrorism-related murder and attempted murder after Finsbury Park attack."

Man charged over Finsbury Park attack - BBC News

 

[Beats & Pieces]

Are you for real? 12 words when you could have said 'any mosques'

No, because that would be too limiting. It isn't just about 'mosques', and hasn't been for a considerable time.

 

[Beats & Pieces]

Depending on who you believe (and I believe no-one) Husain is either a state asset (i.e. an MI5 agent) leading good Muslims away from righteousness, or an Islamist double agent. All I'll say about Husain is that I don't believe in treating him as an authority purely based on his work at Quillam.

That is likely true of him and his famous 'I have a show on LBC' friend.

 

[Beats & Pieces]

Epic fail.

Really? I think you ought to take some time to consider that point. It might be your door next, eh?

 

[Beats & Pieces]

Another example is 'purview'. I don't think you really know what it means. And the typos like 'verancular' and 'premissable' are just funny in the context of so much prolixity/verbiage/long-windedness (see, I can do it, only better) and bogus erudition.

The trouble is you're addressing either people who do know what these words mean, so the whole thing reeks of bullshit because nothing rings completely true,or people who don't know what the fuck you're on about.

But the fact is, they don't. Setting the typos aside - written in anger - the points remain valid. So, setting aside your abuse - what exactly do you think you are trying to say?

 

[Beats & Pieces]

Because passers-by are less likely to engage with rants that mention Jacques Derrida/more likely to give him a shoeing than posters here.

A 'shoeing'?

 

[ViolentPanda]

A 'shoeing'?

A shoeing, a leathering, a damned good thrashing!

 

[Pickman's model]

A shoeing, a leathering, a damned good thrashing!

Bnp would pay good money for that

 

[JuanTwoThree]

But the fact is, they don't. Setting the typos aside - written in anger - the points remain valid. So, setting aside your abuse - what exactly do you think you are trying to say?

I'm saying that for all anybody knows your points are valid but you alienate people by misusing words and using four words when one would do. I'm joining a chorus of people saying much the same:

no, i don't but i find your use of language annoying. you need to start speaking in plain language if you want people to take you seriously.

More importantly, why the fuck do you insist on using words that it's very clear to absolutely everyone else that you don't quite understand the meaning of? It makes you look a right tit.

You use narrative a lot but don't know what it means. You're clearly even a bit confused about what allegedly means. And the sentence 'what is considered normative' makes no sense.

I'm sure you think you're impressing people with what you clearly believe to be your impressive vocabulary but in truth you're just making a right twat of yourself.

Use words you actually understand. Go on, give it a go

And these are just some of the comments. You also had the piss taken in posts imitating your writing style.

I merely agree with these people. Or I am in a narrative place of augmenting concurrence with a group dynamic, if you prefer.

Now can we not smeg up this thread any more? There really isn't anything to add.

 

[Pickman's model]

In the past this particular location had been the subject of media speculation and commentary - and with the involvement of the Metropolitan Police Service those associated with a particular narrative were removed and replaced by a new structure / individuals considered to be more 'mainstream'. Not that it is the business of the state to determine the parameters of religious expression - or what is considered normative or premissable. Setting this aside, the allegedly iconic site appears to have been within the purview of an alleged terrorist attack, allegedly involving a white male from Cardiff (in Wales). Not that Cardiff doesn't have sites of importance in regard to the study /exploration / expression(s) of Islam. After all, why go local when you can travel to a site in London - some distance away.

This whole narrative stinks.

Being as you now agree with the point I was making, I ask again: why did you feel the need to act - if act it was - the clueless wanker?

 

[SpineyNorman]

Just imagine you're in the local and BNP is the drunk pub bore waxing lyrical about topics he has no comprehension of in language of which he has only the faintest familiarity.

Ignore the twat in other words.