Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Finsbury Park Terror Attack

A 'previously disturbed individual'? What does that actually mean? According to what criteria has he been judged / sanctioned - and by what criteria do you judge him?

That is your starting point. That should be the starting point of any possible discussion.

Firstly - the reported statements of his neighbours, who actually appear to have met him.

Secondly, we are talking about someone who appears to have deliberately run down people he has never met, because some other people had deliberately run down some other people whom they had never met. The criteria to judge him is (and should be) the same by which we judge them.
 
Firstly - the reported statements of his neighbours, who actually appear to have met him.

Secondly, we are talking about someone who appears to have deliberately run down people he has never met, because some other people had deliberately run down some other people whom they had never met. The criteria to judge him is (and should be) the same by which we judge them.

He was described as 'aggressive and strange'. What does that actually mean? Is there a record of intervention by the Social Services? Was that 'strangness' ever reported or acted upon by local authorities?
 
He was described as 'aggressive and strange'. What does that actually mean? Is there a record of intervention by the Social Services? Was that 'strangness' ever reported or acted upon by local authorities?
You are funny. Thought your point if there is one is that he's mad not bad, but now you're arguing the opposite.
 
He was described as 'aggressive and strange'. What does that actually mean? Is there a record of intervention by the Social Services? Was that 'strangness' ever reported or acted upon by local authorities?

Are you really saying that only a record of intervention by the Social Services can justify calling someone "aggressive and strange"?
 
taffboy gwyrdd said:
It's all very well for people to froth about that mosque, but I think the fact that the terrorist was held by the people there till plod came, with no harm coming to him, says quite a lot.

It always amazes me that all these muslims are meant to be frothing loons because with a good couple of million or whatever in the country we should all be dead by now if that was the case. I have lived in a diverse area for 20 years, quite a few muslims and close to some areas with a lot. Not once has anyone tried to convert me or chop my head off. Are they bad muslims?

I concur with your fantastic above posting.

Nooooo, the 'bad' muslims are the ones who have been brainwashed by deobandi/salfi/wahabi imams and clerics.

They are just a minority puritanical sects bankrolled and promoted by the Saudi's.
The Rothchilds Khazars want us all to hate all Muslim's.

.
 
Are you really saying that only a record of intervention by the Social Services can justify calling someone "aggressive and strange"?

Of course not - but the fact of an apparent 'social awareness' that uses such a description is worthy of further investigation? If there was some kind of consensus that used the term 'strange', then I would want to know why and how, in what particular circumstances, does such a description arise - and (moreover) is felt to be apprpropriate?

Before the journalists descend.
 
I'm not citing anything until you show everyone how I don't have a clue. Put up: or shut up, bnp.

You don't have a clue - you can't appear to cite any work regarding the position of the Finsbury Park Mosque, although I rather suspect your unwillingness is predicated on your alleged political position on Urban 75, and your alleged antipathy towards the Police.
 
Back
Top Bottom