Vettel and Binotto contradict each other over Ferrari problems
Binotto admitted to Sky Italia post-race that the car lacked balance and was not in the right operating window, almost as if it were a surprise to the team after winter testing at Barcelona. “What we are certain of is that this is not the real potential of our car,” said Binotto in an obvious bid to reassure the Italian audience. “Ferrari has a superior potential, which for some reason here in Australia we have not been able to exploit.
We didn’t feel comfortable on this circuit all weekend long. We lacked the right balance, we tried to review the setup but if there’s no balance the driver can’t drive to the limit.” explained Binotto.
But Vettel told the press post-race that this year
the car balance felt good, and that it’s the complete opposite to 2018 when they finished winter testing expecting to struggle at Melbourne. “Last year we left winter testing with problems with the car. It wasn’t behaving the way we wanted it or the way it should.
This year was the opposite. The car was behaving the way we expected and it felt very good. We came here last year and the balance wasn’t right. We had a very poor rear end last year and we had to trim the car towards understeer a lot. That didn’t feel great. We managed for this weekend last year and obviously the race pace was fine but we weren’t there in qualifying. We got lucky in the race. By Bahrain we had a fix to our issues in winter testing and the first race last year and that’s why we all of a sudden unlocked a lot more pace last year”.
There is a rumour in the paddock that the Ferrari experienced some significant overheating problems in Melbourne (I mentioned this during the testing when there was also a rumour the car had overheating problems), forcing the team to turn down their engine power and open up the cooling on the bodywork. Turning down power hits the hardest on Saturday, when the engine modes are required to be at the max when drivers are bidding for pole. Not only does extra cooling suggest power unit problems, but the biggest issue encountered when having to open up the car’s bodywork for extra cooling is the knock-on effect on aero balance and tyre performance.
Wonder why Ferrari didn't bother pitting Leclerc to give him a pop at the fastest lap point? Seems like a waste of an opportunity if they weren't going to let him pass Vettel.
Binotto asnwered this question when ask by the Italian press, he said "We had the window to pit Charles for new tyres and go for the fastest lap, but whenever you pit, it may be a risk, and I think it was more important for us to bring the car home and score the points. There are sometimes races where you are not the best but it is still important to score points, and at the end, that was our choice. We will eventually review the decision, but the decision was for that reason".
There had been some radio released in regards to Leclerc overtaking Vettel, apparently the radio went like this;
Leclerc "Should I stay behind Sebastian, yes or no"
Team "Yes and back off to have some margin"
Leclerc "OK"
Even though it is just the first race the Italian press are not happy with the result or the fact that Ferrair stopped Leclerc having a go at Vettel, they are calling Vettels performance “weak”. La Gazzetta dello Sport said: “Leclerc seems to have more energy and openly admits that he was told to stay behind in the final stages of the race”.
Sky Sports Italia journalist Mara Sangiorgio said even through it is just the first race the team in red needs to react in Bahrain. Sangiorgio wrote: “The two Ferrari drivers have both shown that they have neither rhythm nor speed. The SF90 struggled throughout the weekend. It is [up to] the Ferrari team principal to immediately stop alarms and deny any other technical and more serious problems”. (I think he is talking here about the overheating rumour).
I see Merc are citing car damage as Lewis’s problem. Managing the media to take some pressure off Lewis, or a real thing? I didn’t see him have any contact, so where would floor damage have come from?
This image appears to show slight damage to Lewis's car floor which the team claim could have cost him four-tenths a lap, the piece of floor, although small, channels air to the diffuser and helps with tyre management, which means not only would Hamilton's W10 have been unbalanced, but also worse on its tyres.