The article makes an assumption that photosynthesis will be similar on other palents and tries to work out if the nearest star provides enough energy
There are lot of red dwarf stars in the milky way
(grabbed the quote from this link, Why does the universe make so many tiny stars?, but I didn't read the article)
By calculating the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) that a planet receives from its star, the team discovered that stars around half the temperature of our Sun cannot sustain Earth-like biospheres because they do not provide enough energy in the correct wavelength range. Oxygenic photosynthesis would still be possible, but such planets could not sustain a rich biosphere.
Planets around even cooler stars known as red dwarfs, which smoulder at roughly a third of our Sun’s temperature, could not receive enough energy to even activate photosynthesis. Stars that are hotter than our Sun are much brighter, and emit up to ten times more radiation in the necessary range for effective photosynthesis than red dwarfs, however generally do not live long enough for complex life to evolve.
“Since red dwarfs are by far the most common type of star in our galaxy, this result indicates that Earth-like conditions on other planets may be much less common than we might hope,” comments Prof. Giovanni Covone of the University of Naples, lead author of the study.
Earth-like biospheres on other planets may be rare
A new analysis of known exoplanets has revealed that Earth-like conditions on potentially habitable planets may be much rarer than previously thought. The work focus...
ras.ac.uk
There are lot of red dwarf stars in the milky way
red dwarfs account for 70 to 80 percent of our galaxy’s stellar content
(grabbed the quote from this link, Why does the universe make so many tiny stars?, but I didn't read the article)
Last edited: