Stanley Edwards said:
I'm going to need a more authoratative source than that website before I'm convinced!
Stanley Edwards said:
littlebabyjesus said:How far south, though? Timbuktu is in the Sahara - hence the value of salt!
littlebabyjesus said:China yes, but I don't think they were trading with sub-Saharan Africa. I'd be interested in any links.
littlebabyjesus said:With the scholarly authority of geocities to back it up.
Um, yes it should.Stanley Edwards said:Well yes, but it shouldn't necessarily be entirely dismissed
littlebabyjesus said:Um, yes it should.
If it were worth considering, the author would have provided at least one reference.
NEGATIVE VIEWS ON SMOKING MUMMIES ARE NOT JUST RESTRICTED TO CIGARETTE PACKETS WILLIAM JACOBS FINDS THAT EGYPTOLOGY HAS ALL BUT IGNORED THE DISCOVERY OF TRACES OF NICOTINE AND COCAINE IN MUMMIES.
littlebabyjesus said:the myth of the 'empty land'.
Stanley Edwards said:Spoil sport.
Try this one instead:
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/toke_like_egyptian.htm
Belushi said:Heh, an article from Fortean Times entitled 'Toke like an Egyptian', now your just taking the piss mate
“The initial reaction to the findings of Balabanova et. al. was highly critical. These criticisms were not based on a known failing in the authors' research methodology, rather they were attempts to cast doubt on an implication of the research - that cocaine and nicotine were brought to Egypt from the New World before Columbus. This conclusion is not acceptable to conservative investigators of the past. In fact it suggests a deep-rooted aversion to what Balabanova suggested might mean an unraveling of aspects of history contrary to basic reconstructions. This aversion, according to Kehoe (1998) stems from the conviction that Indians were primitive savages destined to be overcome by the civilized world - that the acme of evolutionary success resided in the conquering race itself. ‘Childlike savages could never have voyaged across oceans.’ “
“Balabanova's findings bring yet other evidence forward that humanity is not so easily pinioned into the pre-conceived notions of primitive and advanced - even as this might be related to the presumed technology of earlier times. The quest for discovery - to find new worlds - is not just a modern selective advantage of our species. Perhaps it is the defining characteristic. “
So a Welshman discovers the place, so it goes to the English crown?Brockway said:. Been ages since I read it but I think he came to the conclusion that Dr John Dee dug up the Madoc legend to legitimise Elizabeth 1's territorial claims on N. America against the French. ie a Welsh bloke discovered America therefore America belongs to Britain. Typical British imperialism for ya.
I've not heard of that programme. Can you remember any more details?1927 said:If anyone hasn't seen that programme done by that newsreader guy, forget his name...Humphries(?) about the Welsh in America, you should try and see it. very interesting. makes the point that the Welsh influence on US is actually greater thanh the Irish, but goes unrecognised.
Anyone know where I can get a copy?STAR SPANGLED DRAGON Narrated by John Humphrys
BBC (3 x 30 minutes)
As George Washington observed: ‘Good Welshmen make good Americans’. A major series which explores the profound influence of the Welsh in shaping America, from the founding fathers to the present day, from Thomas Jefferson to Hillary Clinton. Nominated for best documentary series at Celtic Film and Television Awards and Best Editor at BAFTA CYMRU AWARDS 2005.
there was one by Huw Edwards recently alsoeditor said:I've not heard of that programme. Can you remember any more details?
John Humphreys is a Splott lad!
bbc said:MADOC
The site's about the Welsh prince Madog who, some say, was the first European to sail to North America. Catchphrase newsletter subscriber ,V. Martin of Charlotte, NC, USA, wrote to say hes convinced the legends real:
"Some of the Madoc/Modoc groups merged with Indian tribes, including the Cherokee and Mandan, Shawnee and others, including some of my relative families: Martin, Combs, and many others of the American South."
You can read a one page piece about Madog's discovery here:
The Portuguese sailors who were sponsored by Henry the Navigator did indeed push down the African coast, establishing a fort at Port Elmina and laying the foundations for among other things the Atlantic slave trade. How widely known the exploits were outside Portugal is another matter.Strangeways said:and, as for contact with sub-saharan africa, i imagine there was, when one considers the activities of the famous prince henry the navigator.