Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Describe your 'political tradition' in one sentence

It's this guy who claims it, although I'm not vouching for the authenticity of it at all. Personally, I think the "avoidable deaths" genocide statistics thing is very questionable (both when applied to Soviet history and here).

What I would say is that given the size of the British Empire, and the imperialist's attitudes toward most of their "subjects", the outright genocide practised in large parts of the Empire (Australia, the Caribbean, North America) and the whole free trade/Malthusian ideology, it would be pretty surprising if they hadn't racked up similar death tolls to the Soviets - most of whose death toll derives not from executions but excess famine deaths and brutal imprisonment anyway.

Thanks!
 
I've been called a red fascist and a left wing fascist in the past - the former by left wing libertarians, the latter by right wing ones :cool:
 
It's this guy who claims it, although I'm not vouching for the authenticity of it at all. Personally, I think the "avoidable deaths" genocide statistics thing is very questionable (both when applied to Soviet history and here).

What I would say is that given the size of the British Empire, and the imperialists attitudes toward most of their "subjects", the outright genocide practised in large parts of the Empire (Australia, the Caribbean, North America) and the whole free trade/Malthusian ideology, it would be pretty surprising if they hadn't racked up similar death tolls to the Soviets - most of whose death toll derives not from executions but excess famine deaths and brutal imprisonment anyway.

You are wise not to.

The British Empire, and Western colonialism, at its height was a world-system that incorporated others formally outside the borders of the Empire even the Ottoman, Chinese, Zanzibari and Thai monarchies face gunboat diplomacy and varying levels of coercion to comply with Western demands.

Where does local imperial responsibility start and where does Western imperial responsibility end? It's a minefield.
 
I'm really not sure why, after the events of the last hundred years, it's acceptable to call yourself a communist but not a fascist.

At least fascists don't have the cheek to suggest that the horrors their ideology brought forth were the result of a few innocent misunderstandings and a couple of bad eggs at the top of the food chain.
Hang on, I thought you were an anarchist?
 
You are wise not to.

The British Empire, and Western colonialism, at its height was a world-system that incorporated others formally outside the borders of the Empire even the Ottoman, Chinese, Zanzibari and Thai monarchies face gunboat diplomacy and varying levels of coercion to comply with Western demands.

Where does local imperial responsibility start and where does Western imperial responsibility end? It's a minefield.
Quite, although I suspect that the impracticality (which we could equally apply to the very well known death tolls of Communism) of making such calculations is not the real reason that such statistics don't really exist...
 
I've always viewed the phrase 'anarchist communist' as indistinguishable from the phrase 'turkey voting for christmas'.

If anarchism and communism are such natural bedfellows why are communists so keen on having all the anarchists shot?
If youre not anarchist-communist, then what anarchist tradition are you?
 
Ah. Lifestylist-individualist anarchism.
Thousands of angry teens have trodden that path before you. A well worn path around the bedroom from stero to mirror and back.

4Real.

I'm not an individualist either. I'm not really an anything-ist. My name's Frank, you can call me that.
 
Back
Top Bottom