goldenecitrone
post tenebras lux
Post new left, post 68, post bennite socialist still looking to move beyond the fragments.
Postman Pat, Post Mr. Benn, Oliver Post-gate.
Post new left, post 68, post bennite socialist still looking to move beyond the fragments.
Astonishing - you are forced to make up some bullshit because you've never heard the people who are supposed to have spouted the said bullshit actually spout the bullshit they are supposed to spout.
I can only make assumptions about what they think as I've never heard a communist actually try to justify the behaviour of their pals down the years.
so do most communists.
Well here's your chance to set me straight. You call yourself a communist, how do you feel about the body count that has traditionally gone hand in hand with your ideology?
Unless you were speaking to a Stalinist or a Maoist, in what sense were the leaders of the socialist countries "their pals"?I can only make assumptions about what they think as I've never heard a communist actually try to justify the behaviour of their pals down the years.
Who knows?
It's just that when I hear 'communism' I think of authoritarian empires built on human bones. Maybe for others the word conjures up images of cups of tea and homemade jumpers but for me it always comes back to the bones.
You dont actually understand what Communism is do you?
Yes, that would be worthwhile.Well here's your chance to set me straight. You call yourself a communist, how do you feel about the body count that has traditionally gone hand in hand with your ideology?
You just wait, fuck Stalin and Mao and the "100 million dead" we'll double that this century, easy.
I wouldn't say that. The Bolsheviks were always a very authoritarian party, they took a brief more libertarian turn for about 6 months in 1917, largely as a response to events, then reverted to type. There's only one thing written by Lenin that you could consider even vaguely democratic in spirit, which is State and Revolution.Yeah, in fact I believe Lenin was anti-authoritarian before the revolution. I can't quite remember how that turned out...
Yes, that would be worthwhile.
How do you feel about the body count thats gone hand in hand with Democracy? I'm happy to compare figures with you.
It's saying we need to rethink a lot of assumptions about left organising
No, it's more that you've not actually shown yourself to be the most avid or insightful student of political history so really all you're good for is prodding.Ah, the 'I don't have to explain myself' defence so beloved of mad dictators.
I tend to judge people by their actions, not their words. To those on the recieving end, communism is less like a nice happy ideology about sharing and equality and more like the wrath of an angry god.
I can only make assumptions about what they think as I've never heard a communist actually try to justify the behaviour of their pals down the years.
Anyway, you're an anarchist who rejects communism, which means you're pretty much a free-market liberal or a randist.
I think per capita it actually comes out quite a bit lower.
Most "communists" have put forward theories about the nature of those regimes though and said either that they're deformed workers states, that they degenerated into capitalism or that they weren't ever workers' states to begin with. I am simplifying it a bit here but I don't think anyone ever says it was just because of a few bad apples.
What are you basing this on? My experience of those on 'the receiving end' of Communism is that there's a much wider range of opinions, from outright hatred to a real sense of regret at it's passing.
Most "communists" have put forward theories about the nature of those regimes though and said either that they're deformed workers states, that they degenerated into capitalism or that they weren't ever workers' states to begin with. I am simplifying it a bit here but I don't think anyone ever says it was just because of a few bad apples.
Anyway, you're an anarchist who rejects communism, which means you're pretty much a free-market liberal or a randist. Great stuff.
Noam Chomsky do you?Can anyone suggest a modern communist writer who covers this sort of thing and can actually string a sentence together? Serious question.