Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

'deprogramming'

Jazzz

Jazzz

the truth don't care
Banned
~ deprogramming ~
with DrJazzz

'deprogramming' is as an antidote to mainstream views and beliefs that we are 'programmed' to believe. I shall interview guests that will be of a high calibre and leading exponents of their views. I am hoping to have maybe 4-5 shows. Topics may include the money system, vaccines, mercury amalgam, AIDS, 9-11 and secret government/agendas.


Confirmed guests include

Bill Still (banking & money)
www.themoneymasters.com

David Icke (grand conspiracy)
www.davidicke.com

Broadcast dates
t.b.a.

Questions:
if anyone has a question on one of these topics they would like to put they are welcome to pose it here, and I'll try to include it...

Also if anyone could assist in recording a theme tune please pm!
hope you enjoy the shows! :cool:​
 
Oh, I'm sure an unchallenged hour of your highly responsible beliefs about vaccines, mercury amalgam and AIDS will do no end of good to the reputation of the radio station and this site.

I can't say it's the kind of thing I want associated with this site, to be honest.

Can't you persuade someone like prisonplanet to run it instead?

I need to think about this.
 
It would only be good, if like the threads here, it could be run by someone more impartial and these claims could be rebuked. That could be very funny and still be seen as beneficial by either side.

However I expect it will be mostly a friendly and collective indulgence of this bonkers conspiricock, which sounds awful. Still, you can make it happen...
 
mauvais mangue said:
However I expect it will be mostly a friendly and collective indulgence of this bonkers conspiricock, which sounds awful.
Click to expand...
I can't see any point in an unchallenged, uncritical conspiraloon love in being presented under the name of urban75.

None at all.
 
Well have a think about the issues after you've listened to the shows! They should be fun. Listening is not compulsory, neither is agreeing. The chance will be to hear the best people on the topic being interviewed who you won't find elsewhere in the media :)
 
DrJazzz said:
Listening is not compulsory
Click to expand...
Neither is having your Listen With Conspiraloons show associated with urban75 in any way at all.

I don't think a one sided fruitloop-fest is appropriate or that I want my years of hard work and the reputation of this site associated with such dubious material.
 
well I was thinking along those lines miss minnie! Is that not under copyright though?
 
I was given the green light for this project from mation, and have put some effort already into it editor. I didn't realise you were going to be personally censoring radio shows you objected to, in fact I didn't realise you were running U75 radio.

Are you? Perhaps the radio team could clarify this for me.
 
i reckon it could be a decent listen if there was someone on it being very cynical/critical of whatever they're on about, as long as each side had enough respect for each other and the format to stop it just turning into a shouting match.
 
editor said:
I can't see any point in an unchallenged, uncritical conspiraloon love in being presented under the name of urban75.
Click to expand...

Why let it be 'unchallenged'?

I for one would love to hear Bill Still 'cross examined' by you, editor. :)

You ever heard of him? I have. My impression is that he knows exactly what he's talking about.

His analysis is very similar to that of David Boyle - who the Executive Director of 'New Economics Foundation' (Ed Mayo) apparently described as 'the finest radical voice of this generation'.

I challenge anyone to listen to what Bill Still has to say, and not come away thinking 'well, f*ck me! I never knew that...' about something.

Go on - you might learn something. :)
 
butchersapron said:
Does the editor have to pre-approve every broadcast? Is that the deal. An he wasn't asked about this?
Click to expand...

I had absolutely no idea that editor was going to act as a censor for U75 radio, I thought it was the poster's programming and was open to all of us.
 
DrJazzz said:
I was given the green light for this project from mation, and have put some effort already into it editor. I didn't realise you were going to be personally censoring the radio show, in fact I didn't realise you were running U75 radio.

Are you?
Click to expand...
I'm not "censoring" it, but I sure as hell have a right to some input as to what gets released under the aegis of urban75 seeing as I created the site and built it up from scratch.

I have no problem with a proper debate, where views are challenged and argued and where wild claims are robustly examined by counterpoint and evidence. That's what makes good radio.

However, I see no merit whatsoever in an elongated conspiraloon love in with a selection of your heroes talking unchallenged shit for hours on end.

It would make this site a laughing stock and probably attract attention-desperate fruitloops to the boards.

I've repeatedly told you that urban75 is not here for the prorogation of conspiraloon theories, yet still you desperately try to keep on pushing your bonkers theories because you know damn well there's nowhere else on the web they'd get such a large audience'

Well, maybe my charity is coming to an end.

I can't even begin to imagine the amount of legal problems you might cause after an unchallenged hour of your unique opinions about vaccines, for example.

I will be talking to mation and others involved in the radio project too, because I definitely don't recall anyone giving you the green light for your unchallenged conspiraloonery.
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
Why let it be 'unchallenged'?

I for one would love to hear Bill Still 'cross examined' by you, editor. :)
Click to expand...
if that could happen, it could keep both sides happy, letting dr j have his program, but also making it obvious to any listeners that u75 wasn't some conspiracy haven;

as for the legal implications, i'm sure that wouldnt be much of a risk seeing as there's already loads of that kinda think on web radio and on the air in the US. i'm sure if prison planet can broadcast, theres not much chance of a station like u75radio gettin into trouble cos of one show which was critical of the topic.
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
Why let it be 'unchallenged'?

I for one would love to hear Bill Still 'cross examined' by you, editor.
Click to expand...
I've got far, far, far better things to do with my time, thanks.

And I'm more concerned about DrJ's intention to have unchallenged, uncritical conspiraloon features on "vaccines, mercury amalgam, AIDS, 9-11 and secret government/agendas".
 
editor said:
However, I see no merit whatsoever in an elongated conspiraloon love in with a selection of your heroes talking unchallenged shit for hours on end.
Click to expand...

I was envisioning maybe 20 mins per episode. No big deal!

I fail to see how interviewing a guest constitutes a 'love-in' and I think your reaction here to a poster seeking to make a contribution to the radio station (which is not yours, as I understood it) is astonishing.

Thank you easy g. Certainly this seems to be the most controversial show, even before any episodes have been recorded! ;)
 
easy g said:
I'd quite like to hear summat like this...especially if it is debated
Click to expand...
DrJ doesn't want any debate. He just wants to nod along as some conspiraloon theory is trotted out without argument.

Behind the scenes, he's been trying to set up another interview with a well known conspiraloon where he has argued vehemently against having anyone in the room who may dare disagree or raise questions about what is being said.

In fact, he set up the 'interview' on that premise.

And that's not an interview: that's a party political broadcast. By his reasoning, I'd have to go along with a BNP broadcast too.
 
DrJazzz said:
Certainly this seems to be the most controversial show, even before any episodes have been recorded!
Click to expand...
I think you're beginning to believe you own hype there, chum.

Get a fucking grip.
 
editor said:
Behind the scenes, he's been trying to set up another interview with a well known conspiraloon where he has argued vehemently against having anyone in the room who may dare disagree or raise questions about what is being said.
Click to expand...

I thought you had 'better things to do with your time' than cross-examine the likes of Bill Still? :rolleyes: :D
 
DrJazzz said:
I thought you had 'better things to do with your time' than cross-examine the likes of Bill Still? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
That doesn't make sense.

Is this true or not:

Behind the scenes, he's been trying to set up another interview with a well known conspiraloon where he has argued vehemently against having anyone in the room who may dare disagree or raise questions about what is being said.
Click to expand...
Shall I name the person you're trying to organise a debate-free interview with?
 
easy g said:
I'd quite like to hear summat like this...especially if it is debated
Click to expand...

But the trouble with radio is that it's a "he said, she said" medium. Especially if the programme followed the foolish rule of giving equal time - which would be like giving equal time to flat-earthers and people who've noticed it's round.

How does it go? Fruitloop presents whole bunch of claims, with no requirement to make them corehent - their refusal to do that is why they're a fruitloop. Opponent either picks the nits one by one; gets fruitloop sectioned in the studio; or goads them into saying something so bonkers that no-one will ever believe them when in future they claim the sun rises in the East.

So, waste of time.
 
Backatcha Bandit said:
Why let it be 'unchallenged'?

I for one would love to hear Bill Still 'cross examined' by you, editor. :)

You ever heard of him? I have. My impression is that he knows exactly what he's talking about.

His analysis is very similar to that of David Boyle - who the Executive Director of 'New Economics Foundation' (Ed Mayo) apparently described as 'the finest radical voice of this generation'.

I challenge anyone to listen to what Bill Still has to say, and not come away thinking 'well, f*ck me! I never knew that...' about something.

Go on - you might learn something. :)
Click to expand...

Having looked at Mr Still's web-site, & his 'recommended reading', I fear his ideas are a (no doubt sanitised) version of the age old conspiracy theiry whereby anti-semitism is updated. Finance capital is separated from industrial capital, & said to be pre-eminent, thereby continuing (even if publicly muted) the tedious age-old attacks on Jews as 'usurers'. The cast list of Still's symopsis includes (as usual) the Rothschilds etc. He also cites the 2 sleight of hand books by Anthiony Sutton, which purport to show the Russian Revolution was finanmced by international finance, and the same 'cabal' controlled the Nazi regime. The sleight of hand comes whereby Sutton assumes that because US finance representatives were on the board of various German companies, this means they thereby controlled them.

So, at first sight, far from thinking "fuck, I never knew that before", my first reaction is "the same old story". Still may be the 'leading expert' in his field, but where this sort of intellectually-debased drivel leads to is, sadly, an anti-semitic path. Still may deny it, but the use of Sutton & the deification of finance capital tells me, for one, where this is all going....
 
DrJazzz said:
But you just said exactly that a few posts ago! :
Click to expand...
Actually, I haven't mentioned the King Fruitloop we both know I'm talking about.

:rolleyes:

Do you deny that the entire premise of the interview was that you told the interviewee that he wouldn't be questioned or challenged on a single thing he said?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom