Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Dark Waters - fantastic American legal thriller film inspired by lawyer who took on DuPont

editor

hiraethified
This is such a great film and such a brilliant, powerful, moving story of a lawyer who took on the corporate might of DuPont when he realised that they were knowingly poisoning people after dumping waste from their Teflon production. I saw it free on Amazon Prime.

The film is splendidly shot, by Ed Lachman (you feel the chill of the office environments, the autumnal warmth of the nature that’s being despoiled), and the acting is superb. Ruffalo makes Robert a blunted conventional grind of a man who slowly wakes up. Anne Hathaway goes further than we’re used to in showing you what the loved ones of a hero like this have to endure (her performance is a piercing dance of agony and loyalty), and Bill Camp takes the role of Wilbur, the farmer who started it all, and creates something indelible; you won’t soon forget his gruff impotence-of-the-little-guy fury. Movies like “Dark Waters” always deliver you to the same place, to that shining land where David defeats Goliath. But not this one — it’s a feel-good movie and a feel-disturbed movie at the same time. But that’s what’s haunting about it. Todd Haynes has made the first corporate thriller that’s a call to action because you’ll emerge from it feeling anything but safe.



 
Erin Brockovich on Biden and Du Pont.

DuPont were absolute filth. Scum. In a fair world all of the people responsible at the top should have been slung in jail for murder.

PFOA pollutes the blood of nearly every American and can pass from mother to unborn child in the womb. This toxic product of industry is a stable compound not easily broken down in the environment or in the human body, giving it the nickname “forever chemical”. Scientists have found it in living beings across the globe – from animals living in the depths of the sea to birds on remote islands.

The Environmental Protection Agency has set no enforceable national drinking water limits for perfluorinated chemicals, including PFOA. Tens of thousands of community drinking water systems across the country have never even tested for these contaminants.

McCabe started managing DuPont’s communications with the EPA about the toxic chemical in 2003, according to an article in the Intercept. This was the time in which DuPont faced a barrage of litigation after the company dumped 7,100 tons of PFOA-filled waste in West Virginia, which made its way into the drinking water of 100,000 people. Countless members of the community faced debilitating illnesses as a result. The legal battle with the company was turned into the film Dark Waters in 2019.

Mind you, DuPont suspected that their product was harmful since the 1960s – experiments they conducted in 1961 showed that PFOS affected the livers of dogs and rabbits. McCabe’s work inevitably contributed to staving off costly clean-up and additional regulation headaches for the company.

Are we the people supposed to trust a former DuPont man in a transition team tasked with reviewing the Chemical Safety Board? Is this how the newly elected leadership wants to start what is supposed to be a healing and unifying administration? Are we already falling back on the old and antiquated, hide-and-seek, conceal, dodge and deny leadership or are you going to come out and be the change and the hope needed when it comes to the environment?
 
Gonna watch it again today, it has just the right dosage of sentimentality in that it wasn’t over the top regarding the awful subject matter.

Was good to see the real guy who was born with the physical defects pop up in it aswell. You can see he’s not allowed what happened to run him down.

Ruffalo was great as he always mostly is.

Just don’t think Anne Hathaway seemed a good fit in that role. Don’t think it was for her. Seemed to phone it in.
 
Couldn't see anything wrong with her performance, like the rest of the cast, I thought she was very good.

good, as always, just don’t see her as a good fit for that role. She’s too glam.

also didn’t find much chemistry between herself and Mark Ruffalo.

I’m nitpicking here
 
good, as always, just don’t see her as a good fit for that role. She’s too glam.

also didn’t find much chemistry between herself and Mark Ruffalo.

I’m nitpicking here
If anything, the real Sarah Barladge is far more "glam", how do you think the wife of a wealthy attorney should look ? If anything, they toned down how she presents herself at public events for the film. If you think she had "no chemistry" with Ruffalo, that may be because they play a couple married for many years between whom there are tensions for much of the film, not young starry eyed lovers. You may want to have a think as to why you are singling out the main female cast member for criticism while praising the men. She's a better and far more versatile actor than Bill Pullman will ever be.
 
Last edited:
If anything, the real Sarah Barladge is far more "glam", how do you think the wife of a wealthy attorney should look ? If anything, they toned down how she presents herself at public events for the film. If you think she had "no chemistry" with Ruffalo, that may be because they play a couple married for many years between whom there are tensions for much of the film, not young starry eyed lovers. You may want to have a think as to why you are singling out the main female cast member for criticism while praising the men. She's a better and far more versatile actor than Bill Pullman will ever be.

the Bill Pullman thing was tongue in cheek, apologies for not being able to carry that over in written form. Though I did think referencing his role in Independence Day might help you draw the distinction I made.

and as for Anne Hath, I just don’t see her as good in a secondary role. She got too much charisma for it.

as mentioned, I’m just nitpicking
 
If anything, the real Sarah Barladge is far more "glam", how do you think the wife of a wealthy attorney should look ? If anything, they toned down how she presents herself at public events for the film. If you think she had "no chemistry" with Ruffalo, that may be because they play a couple married for many years between whom there are tensions for much of the film, not young starry eyed lovers. You may want to have a think as to why you are singling out the main female cast member for criticism while praising the men. She's a better and far more versatile actor than Bill Pullman will ever be.

p.s. please don’t allude to me being misogynistic. Please. Out of order there.
 
If anything, the real Sarah Barladge is far more "glam", how do you think the wife of a wealthy attorney should look ? If anything, they toned down how she presents herself at public events for the film. If you think she had "no chemistry" with Ruffalo, that may be because they play a couple married for many years between whom there are tensions for much of the film, not young starry eyed lovers. You may want to have a think as to why you are singling out the main female cast member for criticism while praising the men. She's a better and far more versatile actor than Bill Pullman will ever be.

you know, this incenses me that you think I’m going after the only female lead. Maybe I should make an appraisal of Judy Garland, Wizard of Oz, in a positive light to exonerate myself.
 
If anything, the real Sarah Barladge is far more "glam", how do you think the wife of a wealthy attorney should look ? If anything, they toned down how she presents herself at public events for the film. If you think she had "no chemistry" with Ruffalo, that may be because they play a couple married for many years between whom there are tensions for much of the film, not young starry eyed lovers. You may want to have a think as to why you are singling out the main female cast member for criticism while praising the men. She's a better and far more versatile actor than Bill Pullman will ever be.

plus she was an attorney herself, so may we level here?
 
If anything, the real Sarah Barladge is far more "glam", how do you think the wife of a wealthy attorney should look ? If anything, they toned down how she presents herself at public events for the film. If you think she had "no chemistry" with Ruffalo, that may be because they play a couple married for many years between whom there are tensions for much of the film, not young starry eyed lovers. You may want to have a think as to why you are singling out the main female cast member for criticism while praising the men. She's a better and far more versatile actor than Bill Pullman will ever be.

reading this again and again - take a step back cowboy - this was not an indictment on her appearance. Apology would be nice...
 
reading this again and again - take a step back cowboy - this was not an indictment on her appearance. Apology would be nice...
Go write more posts. Maybe I'll consider apologising when you get to 200 posts on the subject in a row.

(anything to keep you occupied :D )
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom