Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Critical Theory and Social Movements today

you read it? - the worker auto-didacts' imaginative reconfiguration of capitalist time - Thought that might appeal
 
Read it? thought it was a video.

Union still better than these people.

An academics use/enclosure of potential worker time without getting rid of work...nah...thievery
 
The relation between Critical Theory and Social Movements in perfect

to be fair no-one is arguing that, quite the reverse.

I'll fess up, I haven't read Nights of Labour yet - it's out of print in translation - but I'm definitely going to when I can get my hands on a copy.
:
Originally published in France in 1981, this first English translation of Les Nuits des Prolétaires dramatically reinterprets the Revolution of 1830, contending that workers were not rebelling against specific hardships and conditions but against the unyielding predetermination of their lives. Through a study of worker-run newspapers, letters, journals, and worker-poetry, Rancière reveals the contradictory and conflicting stories that challenge the coherence of these statements celebrating labor.

Nineteenth-century workers sought out proletarian intellectuals, poets, and artists who were able to articulate their longings. At night, these worker-intellectuals gathered to write journals, poems, music, letters, and to discuss issues. The worker diatribes they composed served the purpose of escape from their daily worker lives. Unwilling to give in to sleep at night to repair the body for more manual labor, these "migrants who moved at the borders between classes" regarded the night as their real life. They sought to appropriate for themselves the night of those who could stay awake and the language of those who did not have to beg. Once these workers and those whom they represented had glimpsed other lives, they fought for the possibility of living other lives.

Thus, Rancière disregards "the majestic masses" and concentrates instead on the words and fantasies of a few dozen "nonrepresentative" individuals—those who performed the radical act of breaking down the time-honored barrier separating those who carried out useful labor from those who pondered aesthetics.

edit - a PDF version is on KG. Magnifique!
 
Yes, it's seidman type stuff - all politics ripped out. What relevance does it have to me - unskilled worker 2010?

They're arguing that it has no relevance to me? Is this what 'quite the reverse' means? So why should i care.
 
eh? you're losing me

"quite the reverse" - I meant that they were arguing that neither Critical Theory nor the state of social movements today were adequate to the situation that we face. I guess you can say, who are they addressing here? And it would be a fair question.

Who is Seidman - Should I be :oops: about my ignorance here?
 
Michael Seidman - my site got taken down with all his stuff on. Not enough money to keep it going.

This is meaningless to me or anyone i know. No need for 1.52 hour video. There's the answer
 
OK, sounds interesting. There's (mention of?) some of his stuff on LibCom.

Is it the relevance of "social movements" - rather than, say, "workers" that you are objecting to? Or the specialisation of "theory" that you are objecting to? Or something else altogether?
 
Here's a point for you, the gap between the left academy grows as student numbers rise.

the gap between the left academy and what...? A radicalised body of students? The workers?

Actually, given the extent of the higher education cutbacks we'll be looking at, I would have thought that left academics in "unproductive". "unprofitable" areas like the humanities will be getting very worried. Already in Britain you've seen Manchester turf out Eagleton in favour of a stellar celeb like Martin Amis.

I would've thought that a common enemy might foster closer links woth grassroots radicalism?
 
the gap between the left academy and what...? A radicalised body of students? The workers?

Actually, given the extent of the higher education cutbacks we'll be looking at, I would have thought that left academics in "unproductive". "unprofitable" areas like the humanities will be getting very worried. Already in Britain you've seen Manchester turf out Eagleton in favour of a stellar celeb like Martin Amis.

I would've thought that a common enemy might foster closer links woth grassroots radicalism?

The gap between them and popular culture- between them and my mum.
 
the gap between the left academy and what...? A radicalised body of students? The workers?
Anyone else, generally.
Actually, given the extent of the higher education cutbacks we'll be looking at, I would have thought that left academics in "unproductive". "unprofitable" areas like the humanities will be getting very worried. Already in Britain you've seen Manchester turf out Eagleton in favour of a stellar celeb like Martin Amis.

I would've thought that a common enemy might foster closer links woth grassroots radicalism?
That's going to depend whether you subscribe to the "my enemy's enemy is my friend" schtick, isn't it? :)
 
What is the time frame you are talking about - the gap has grown since Althusser or Foucault? Or are you talking about a gap that has grown up since the mid-sixties and wasn't there before?

I know he wasn't an academic - but I very much doubt that Marx thought Capital was going to get a broad popular readership. Nor did Hegel.
 
Syphilis and claret-abuse.
:D

Do I think a gap has opened up? - well, undoubtedly there was a retreat into the institutions in the wake of 68 when "theory" was speaking to a much more engaged and committed audience.

There are less of what you might call "public intellectuals" around today. But then they haven't always been much cop anyway (look at Bernard Henri-Levy in France).
 
There are plenty of public intellectuals at large in France, and I'm pretty sure that Habermas and couple of others are regulars on German chat shows/Newsnight review type talking head stuff.
 
Back
Top Bottom