CIA knew of 9/11 - told Admin - Covered Up for Inquiry

[kyser_soze]

OOO, someone is getting a little touchy because I've called them from the look of it.

Whichever - it's still largely a re-write of DD, but updated for the post-9/11 era.

So what else have you to say about my post, other than ad hominem attacks?

 

[DrRingDing]

Yeah, but you're plugging Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent, and I'm calling you on saying you're applying Chomsky's filters to reach the conclusion there was an inside job on 9/11 because you're talking absolute bollocks.

I was refering to Chomskys filters in response to the editors claims of the medias integrity.

Your lies do not do you well.

 

[editor]

Too busy trying score jobs with mutlinational media companies no doubt.

Actually, I find that running this free website and organising free club nights takes up the greater part of my time, but ever I was in doubt what a pathetic little point-scoring cunt you could be, that last comment leaves me in no doubt.

Even if I was "Too busy trying score mutlinational media companies" (which I'm not, you ignorant, clueless twat) what the fuck would that have to do with my opinions on the BBC and 9/11?

Or do you think you've somehow got the moral ground here because you're on the dole?

 

[DrRingDing]

It would have had to involve a large number of people, something would be very likely to leak

This is where I disagree with Naom, information is so centralised in the US that a warning such as was given to condi...and most probably there was more..are easy to brush aside for your clique.

Who could of imagine a terrorist strike so devastating as 9/11 before?

I couldn't and I'm sure most people wouldn't of either.

I strongly believe they expected a hijaacking on home soil, possibly a crash onto a major city posssibly hundreds of deaths or even many less.

I remember Rumsfeld stating they didn't believe there would be an attack so severe....and I believe him.

 

[kyser_soze]

Lies eh?

Nothing would convince you of the US admin clique wanted a serious terrorist attack on home soil.

Not a signed confesssion.

Not even CIA piping up.

Admit it, nothing would stop your unquestioning, blinkered support for them.

Who could of imagine a terrorist strike so devastating as 9/11 before?

Tom Clancey - wrote about a Japanese student flying a 747 into the Sears tower in Chicago around 1993.

You've reversed your position considerably from that first post DRR - you're basically about where I was a couple of years ago if that's how you actually feel.

 

[DrRingDing]

Actually, I find that running this free website and organising free club nights takes up the greater part of my time, but ever I was in doubt what a pathetic little point-scoring cunt you could be, that last comment leaves me in no doubt.

Even if I was "Too busy trying score mutlinational media companies" (which I'm not, you ignorant, clueless twat) what the fuck would that have to do with my opinions on the BBC and 9/11?

Or do you think you've somehow got the moral ground here because you're on the dole?

Charmed I'm sure.

btw I'm not on the dole.

 

[WouldBe]

Who could of imagine a terrorist strike so devastating as 9/11 before?

I couldn't and I'm sure most people wouldn't of either.

Except that scenario had been thought of before. Wasn't there a disaster movie made before 9/11 that involved a plane being deliberately flown into a skyscraper?

Oops.

 

[DrRingDing]

nice to see the thread going well.

 

[DrRingDing]

Except that scenario had been thought of before. Wasn't there a disaster movie made before 9/11 that involved a plane being deliberately flown into a skyscraper?

Oops.

Completely destroying both of the wtcs!?

 

[Crispy]

Who could of imagine a terrorist strike so devastating as 9/11 before?

It's could have, ignoramus

 

[editor]

Charmed I'm sure.

Are you going to apologise for posting up that lie about me supposedly being "too busy trying score jobs with mutlinational media companies" or not?

And then perhaps you might explain the significance of your bizarre comment.

 

[editor]

nice to see the thread going well.

That's probably down to you doing your best to trash it with your unprovoked, off topic, ad hominen attacks.

 

[DrRingDing]

That's probably down to you doing your best to trash it with your unprovoked, off topic, ad hominen attacks.

Now your not at all known to 'trash' 9/11 threads are you?

 

[DrRingDing]

Are you going to apologise for posting up that lie about me supposedly being "too busy trying score jobs with mutlinational media companies" or not?

And then perhaps you might explain the significance of your bizarre comment.

This needs to be taken into private. As things need to be said.

 

[editor]

This needs to be taken into private.

No, it doesn't. You made this accusation publicly, so either back it up here or apologise.

Where did you get this I'm "too busy trying score jobs with mutlinational media companies" bullshit from?

Oh, and what's it got to do with the topic under debate, anyway?

 

[editor]

Now your not at all known to 'trash' 9/11 threads are you?

I only 'trash' the laughable fact-free bullshit posted up by obsessed.

Meanwhile, you're doing a grand job of trying to sidetrack this thread with FAQ-busting, off-topic claims about poster's employment.

 

[DrRingDing]

No, it doesn't. You made this accusation publicly, so either back it up here or apologise.

If you do not make your living from multinational media corprations and are continuing to look for contracts with these institutuions I take back what I said.

Otherwise anything more that is to be said is to be in private.

Or Ban me.

 

[kyser_soze]

multinational media corprations

Would it be different if it were a local, south london media co-operative?

 

[pk]

Or Ban me.

 

[editor]

If you do not make your living from multinational media corprations and are continuing to look for contracts with these institutuions I take back what I said.

Otherwise anything more that is to be said is to be in private.

Or Ban me.

Am I "too busy trying to score jobs with mutlinational media companies" or not then?

That's your claim.

I've no idea what made you indulge in this bizarre, FAQ-busting hissy fit of lies, but I'm really not going to let your weird bullshit stand unchallenged.

Seeing as you seem to know more about my own life than me, could you name these "multinational media corporations" that I'm busy chasing, please? What contracts am I after? Feel free to post up their names here!

Oh, and what's all this got to do with 9/11 and the BBC?

 

[DrRingDing]

This interweb cafe is kicking me out as it closing time here so the "discusion" will have to wait until tomorrow.

 

[ska invita]

I think this thread has had its day.

 

[editor]

This interweb cafe is kicking me out as it closing time here so the "discusion" will have to wait until tomorrow.

The only "discussion" I want to see forthcoming from you is an apology for posting up a load of weird, off-topic, FAQ-busting personal bullshit that you dreamt up.

Or perhaps you'll be able produce evidence of these non-existent multinational media companies that I'm supposed to busily trying to "score jobs" with? That might fun to read.

Oh, and then you might finally explain what possible significance or relevance all this has got to do with 9/11 and the BBC because it sure beats me.

 

[Jazzz]

Just wondering, has anyone else noticed that in most places 'FAQ' stands for 'frequently asked questions', the answers to which are generally in the spirit of being helpful and accommodating?

 

[editor]

Just wondering, has anyone else noticed that in most places 'FAQ' stands for 'frequently asked questions', the answers to which are generally in the spirit of being helpful and accommodating?

Sorry, is there a remotely relevant point you're trying to make here, or are you just trying to drag this even further off topic?

 

[Jazzz]

Quite right editor - let's stick to the topic of 9/11 cover-ups.

 

[Barking_Mad]

T'was only a matter of time........Im sure there's an U75 mathematical equation to work out for how long these threads take before ending up like this..

 

[editor]

Im sure there's an U75 mathematical equation to work out for how long these threads take before ending up like this..

Ain't that the truth.

Mind you, even I didn't expect it to turn into a weird fantasy piece about my non-existent, time-consuming quest to supposedly "score work" with (unnamed) "multinational media companies."

Very odd.

Not as odd as Jazzz's sci-fi hologram pods that have been teleported from the year 2025, of course, but still weirder than usual. Maybe it's got something to do with the Moon.

Or the owls.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

This interweb cafe is kicking me out as it closing time here so the "discusion" will have to wait until tomorrow.

An internet cafe that closes at 6 pm. Where are you: the Shire?

 

[Yuwipi Woman]

T'was only a matter of time........Im sure there's an U75 mathematical equation to work out for how long these threads take before ending up like this..

Bs = T/Pi x L2

(Bullshit equals Total posts divided by Pi times the number of Loonies squared.)