Rushy
basically a scrotum
It's okay people, you can still have a glass of Champagne without feeling like an evil oppressor!
I'm not saying anyone who drinks Champagne does so intentionally to act or feel superior, I'm saying the drink is so heavily loaded with subliminal associations of 'success'
(Success as defined by Western neo-liberal ideology) that the appeal of it is principally I n what it signifies, rather than the liquid itself or the alcohol content.
You might just want to try it, innocently, and without being mean or showy, and that's allright, but somewhere below the surface is a devisive endorsement.
I remember a party where a few guys were hoofing cocaine off a coffee table while also discussing how mad it was that someone is shot dead in Mexico every 15 minutes. These guys weren't stood on the border with AK-47's aimed at Mexican heads, but they are endorsing.
There are plenty of folk who don't like inequality who will still pop into C&F for some futile fromage, so what, in the scheme it doesn't matter I suppose. I choose not to partake.
Sure. I've read all about the ethics of Coltan mining in the congo on my PDA.
I've wondered whether coffee beans are Fairtrade and whether Fairtrade is really such a great deal for peasant workers over a flat white.
Actually, in contrast, grape picking in the UK/France has its faults and its bad guys but in general you are buying a responsibly made product - particularly if you are buying from small retailers who have limited purchasing clout and specialise in buying from small producers.
Yes - the massive corporate branding of champagne has made the product "exclusive". But if anything C+F seems to be contributing towards breaking that down. Helping explode the myth that the corporate Champagne superbrands are so damned special.
It's good that we question things. But singling out champagne drinkers is a lazy distraction. To varying degrees most people could afford £8 for a glass of champagne as a treat if they wanted. Many, like me, would usually choose not to - it just does not seem like good value to me. And there are a small number who could not whether they wanted to or not.
But people who have a £40 weekly food budget do not spend £2.70 or £5.40 for two /day on barrista made coffee - an entirely non essential. Or £4something on a pint. They are excluded full stop. Complaining about champagne drinkers from the comfort of a wifi enabled pub or coffee shop is already a conspicuous privilege not available to all and attempts to justify one over the other seems to have more to do with justifying the complainants' own consumption patterns than genuine concern for the excluded. Throwing stones from inside glass fronted coffee shops, and all that...