did he own up to vomming in your cupboard yet?
Not yet, but I've set up a trip wire to catch him out
did he own up to vomming in your cupboard yet?
What does a laptop symbolise, exactly?C'mon. The thread judges the place and the people on what you imagine champagne to symbolise. It's not that different from laptops, cameras and smartphones, which are all acceptable to people here.
What does champagne symbolise?What does a laptop symbolise, exactly?
"The thread judges the place and the people on what you imagine champagne to symbolise" - well no, the thread doesn't do anything.C'mon. The thread judges the place and the people on what you imagine champagne to symbolise. It's not that different from laptops, cameras and smartphones, which are all acceptable to people here.
What has this grand red herring has to do with the socio-economic impact of a champagne bar opening up in the poorest ward in Lambeth?
"The thread judges the place and the people on what you imagine champagne to symbolise" - well no, the thread doesn't do anything.
Whatever, "It's not that different from laptops, cameras and smartphones" is absolutely not the case.
You've not read it have you? That's okay, it's nearly 80 pages long. But shut up about it, ta.
If you're just going to play silly buggers and avoid answering questions by posting up silly questions, I'll leave you to it.What does champagne symbolise?
If you're just going to play silly buggers and avoid answering questions by posting up silly questions, I'll leave you to it.
What does a laptop symbolise, exactly?
I think it's going to have a noticeable impact within the market space and the locality, even if it is only acting as an accelerant for the already-occurring process of fast-rising rents and the pricing out of traditional businesses. I expect more expensive, upmarket businesses to follow them into the market.I doubt C+F, or Brixton Village for that matter, has much of a socio-economic impact compared with the very much bigger picture of London's housing crisis.
Rents, for example, would have gone up anyway. It's not clear to me that housing costs have accelerated any more here than in East Dulwich, Balham or Tooting.
Besides C+F is here basically because Claphamites have been priced out of Clapham.
You're the one making this ridiculous comparison, so why don't you at least try to justify it?
Some posh bloke started giving the staff a hard time last night because he was unable to get a drink when he arrived at the bar as last orders were called. Happily his girlfriend put him straight, commenting, "Stop being such a fucking arsehole."I think a lot of the C&F crowd were in the Albert tonight
My fantasy conflagration* would take in ChampFro, then the Wine Parlour and Tique Booty. Nandos is so far out of town for me, I don't even notice it.I would rather Nandos burnt down than ChampFro. There, I have said it.
Actually, on balance, it's another attempt to distort the arguments involved. We saw this previously with the bizarre "but the Albert serves champagne" thing - that was attempting to redefine the argument against C&F as some sort of "anti-champagne" one. (As well as being weirdly personal - "your pub serves champagne".) Now it's trying to redefine the opposition as one about spending money on anything at all. You bought a thing how dare you complain about people buying things because that is what you are talking about here despite everything else you say.
I bought some shoes the other day. I'm such a hypocrite.
I would rather Nandos burnt down than ChampFro. There, I have said it.
I would rather Nandos burnt down than ChampFro. There, I have said it.
uk benzo said:My 3 year old would punch you in the nuts if he heard you say that. He loves it in there. It's the only time he gets excited about chicken.
I like Nandos.I would rather Nandos burnt down than ChampFro. There, I have said it.
You're the one making this ridiculous comparison, so why don't you at least try to justify it?
there was an almighty fuss when Nandos planned to open in Stoke Newington, a lot of people on FB hated the idea of it - C&F would not prompt such protestI'm a bit baffled by Nando's; it's not complete crap but it's a bit meh; lots of people seem to love it though.
I don't agree with that I'm afraid. There's an absurd level of stereotyping of opposition to this - you hate champagne! (and the Albert serves champagne!) YOU ARE BULLIES LEAVE C&F ALONE you have phones !!!!11±!!!!! what's wrong with cheese?????? - it's just a joke.I have been thinking about the gulf between the two sides of this debate and why it has arisen. I suspect in reality that both sides are pretty au fait with issues of inequality/poverty and share the same concerns about them.
The position has been made very, very clear and if you're claiming it's otherwise (e.g. Yelkcub) you're the enemy. Work it out if you don't want to be.
point it out then ffsI don't mind being the enemy. It makes no difference to my life. But, there's some first class hypocrisy that so obvious to someone as uninvolved as me, it's impossible to comment without pointing it out.
I have been thinking about the gulf between the two sides of this debate and why it has arisen. I suspect in reality that both sides are pretty au fait with issues of inequality/poverty and share the same concerns about them.
I think on one side we are looking for intellectual consistency - what is it *exactly* that makes C+F the tipping point? That leads to arguments about price of champagne in other venues, whether there were earlier tipping points etc.
On the anti-side however, it's more of an emotional reaction - C+F just *feels* wrong - that this time things have gone too far. And if it feels that wrong, then the arguments about consistency from the other side feel like the other side are missing the point. Whereas actually we are just looking at it from a different perspective.
Did anyway answer my question about the music policy?