British IS schoolgirl 'wants to return home'

[Shechemite]

We’ll see the same thing as with the Remain lawfare actions - angsty liberals making a lot of noise and losing friends and alienating people in the process.

The government approach to immigration, deportation and ‘extremism’ will be ‘tougher’ because of this.

 

[Spymaster]

See, this is why the French are to be admired - they just paid the Iraqis to string up all their unwanteds, and now the problem has gone away...

Job done

 

[littlebabyjesus]

Fingers crossed. More likely she'll be granted some kind of temporary leave to remain and held in an immigration facility.

Well she's not going to be deported from here, is she?

Setting aside your hatred for her, can you see how this is actually a good thing. The UK govt's right to act arbitrarily in this way is being questioned and hopefully will be successfully challenged. Don't be scared of Begum.

 

[maomao]

I meant what I posted.

You meant: 'The slug is coming back for a hearing on whether it is citizenship should be restored'?

 

[8ball]

When is the two minute hate scheduled for?

 

[Spymaster]

Well she's not going to be deported from here, is she?

Nowhere to send her. The best we can hope for now is for the legal process to be dragged out forever and for her to be detained indefinitely.

 

[Ax^]

We’ll see the same thing as with the Remain lawfare actions - angsty liberals making a lot of noise and losing friends and alienating people in the process.

The government approach to immigration, deportation and ‘extremism’ will be ‘tougher’ because of this.

don't think angry liberals are to blame for the wind rush scandal

 

[krtek a houby]

facebook is gonna go doolally.

Urban is gonna go doolally.

 

[philosophical]

Aren't the spooks going for the Epstein solution?
If British law is robust then she should come back and get it all out in the courts.
If the law is weak that is down to the lawmakers.

 

[Spymaster]

The UK govt's right to act arbitrarily in this way is being questioned and hopefully will be successfully challenged.

The government did not act arbitrarily and that's what is going to be tested. The right of a government to strip the citizenship of a dual national who takes pains to travel overeas to support a murderous rape cult.

 

[cyril_smear]

The government did not act arbitrarily and that's what is going to be tested. The right of a government to strip the citizenship of a dual national who takes pains to travel overeas to support a murderous rape cult.

she's not a dual national though is she is my understanding.

 

[Spymaster]

she's not a dual national though is she is my understanding.

Your understanding is wrong.

 

[tim]

Urban is gonna go doolally.

There's nothing more edifying than a bunch of middle-aged men frothing about a young woman who made a mistake when she was 15.

 

[cyril_smear]

Your understanding is wrong.

Does she hold a passport for another country? Was her birth registered in another country?

 

[Pickman's model]

The government did not act arbitrarily and that's what is going to be tested. The right of a government to strip the citizenship of a dual national who takes pains to travel overeas to support a murderous rape cult.

whoa there. no one yet knows if they did act arbitrarily as that question is about to be decided.

 

[Shechemite]

don't think angry liberals are to blame for the wind rush scandal

doubt many on here do. Not sure what it’s got to with my post

 

[Spymaster]

Does she hold a passport for another country? Was her birth registered in another country?

Lots about this on this thread. Under Bangladeshi law she was a citizen of that country by descent.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

Lots about this on this thread. Under Bangladeshi law she was a citizen of that country by descent.

... according to the UK. Bangladeshi govt has different ideas.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

Does she hold a passport for another country? Was her birth registered in another country?

No, and no. Born in the UK. Parents from Bangladesh, which she's never visited. Bangladesh had no record of her existence.

 

[8ball]

... according to the UK. Bangladeshi govt has different ideas.

Two Governments thinking they can make up changes to long held laws on the spot.

 

[cyril_smear]

Lots about this on this thread. Under Bangladeshi law she was a citizen of that country by descent.

The Government of Bangladesh, however, stated that Begum does not hold Bangladeshi citizenship and will not be allowed to enter the country.


So what do you do with someone who's still a relatively young woman in this case?

 

[Smokeandsteam]

There's nothing more edifying than a bunch of middle-aged men frothing about a young woman who made a mistake when she was 15.

Precisely. Who here didn’t join a religious death cult when they were younger?

 

[bellaozzydog]

Bring her back, treat her well, if she has broke a UK law bail her and apply due process

caveat fuxk draconian U.K. anti terrorism legislation and fuck every gammon who’s head will explode when she gets here

 

[8ball]

Precisely. Who here didn’t join a religious death cult when they were younger?

I prefer the phrase 'New Religious Movement'.

 

[bellaozzydog]

Job done

You are starting to sound like a bit of a cunt

 

[Spymaster]

... according to the UK. Bangladeshi govt has different ideas.

Because one bloke in the Bangladeshi government chooses to misinterpret their very clear law, doesn't make it fact.

 

[Spymaster]

You are starting to sound like a bit of a cunt

Starting?

You haven't been here long, have you?

 

[bimble]

I don't care much what happens to this particular person but am glad it looks like there's going to be a proper examination of the principle on which the gov tried to take away her citizenship. The rules are apparently that they can strip you of your citizenship if "It is for the public good" and if would not "make you stateless". As a person with more than 1 citizenship but whose never lived anywhere but here I want to understand this properly, else anyone with dual citizenship, however theoretical, can be exiled from the uk for quite undefined reasons basically, and that can't be a good thing.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

Because one bloke in the Bangladeshi government chooses to misinterpret their very clear law, doesn't make it fact.

Fuck's sake. Bangladesh had no record of her at all. You choose to interpret their law as meaning that even those it has no idea exist are citizens. That is at best questionable and something to be tested in a Bangladeshi court. UK govt is playing a fast one, and in the light of Windrush, we need to stop this kind of shit. Yes, even for monsters like Begum. That she is a vile human being is irrelevant, and tbh not even in contention.

 

[not-bono-ever]

Because one bloke in the Bangladeshi government chooses to misinterpret their very clear law, doesn't make it fact.

though it is a fact that she would not be given the opportunity to disembark at or even board a plane to bangaladesh now