ChrisFilter
Like a boss.
12 kills, 12 deaths.
I'm a slow and steady type. I like to make sure of my ground before advancing.
I'm a slow and steady type. I like to make sure of my ground before advancing.
coouple of reviews says that this pwns MW3.
Anyone heard of getting a beta if you preorder? Somebody mentioned it to me, but I can't seem to find details
What? MW3 isn't even out for another 4 months.
Well, I think they are getting a little ahead of themselves based on a few rounds of only one multiplayer map at pre-alpha stage. Plus technologically it is far superior to MW3.
BF3: Brand new engine based on the Frostbite 1.0 engine named Frostbite 2. Amazing lighting, animation and visual effects. Real time destructible environments. Jets, helicopters, IFV's, tanks, water vehicles, humvee's etc. Amazing sound. And when I say amazing I mean amazing. Those of you that play BC2 know how good the sound is, it will be even better in BF3. Realistic bullet physics, some large expansive maps and smaller urban maps, tactics are important and a more mature online crowd. Free Battlelog to keep track of everthing you do
MW3: Based on an engine that is 7 years old, looks like the previous 4 games, shit sound, very linear multiplayer, no gun recoil, really annoying people playing it and taking it far too seriously. Free Elite service for the basics, paid sub if you want more info.
I know which one I'd prefer if I wasn't biased towards the Battlefield franchise
Let the fanboy wars begin!
I much prefer the multiplayer of BC2. But the single player of MW3 was much better, ridiculously over the top and very memorable.
The co-op spec op missions in MW2 were fucking cool
Let the fanboy wars begin!
I much prefer the multiplayer of BC2. But the single player of MW3 was much better, ridiculously over the top and very memorable.
MW2 was a work of art for that specific on-rails genre.
Nah it wasn't, it was satire of gameplay, even Halo has more finesse as a single player. </tryrealhardtohaveaflamewar>