Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Art that people rave about that's actually shit.

I have to agree and I was willing to accept his premise. Art school certainly isn't for everyone. Anyone who want to paint in realist styles shouldn't bother with more than the foundation courses. Instead they should take courses from artists they respect and just work, work, work.

I think that's true in some ways but not in others. Teachers at art schools don't do much in the way of teaching technique anymore...as in, "this is how you do scenery..." (a la Bob Ross - that sort of direct style: copy what I do) but they do give you the tools you need to find your own style and improve your technique from teaching you how to work with the materials, how to create a great composition, how to look at your own work critically, and so on.
I don't necessarily think this is a bad thing.
If you want to learn how to paint in a very specific style, and you're not really interested in anything else, perhaps finding a mentor is the way to go instead of going through art school.
 
I like drawing when I have a burning desire to get something out of me, a visual etc etc.
But I do not like just drawing 'stuff' because it is there and you have to practice.
I guess I need to be more disciplined and hopefully I will be... in time ;)
 
i can't speak for fine art but certainly as far as my course is concerned they teach us a whole *load* of stuff about professional practice, alongside really challenging theoretical work (which definitely applies to fine art) as well. i really do wonder how many people who have an opinion on the usefulness or otherwise of art school actually have any first-hand experience to draw on (lol).

I went to art school and managed to make a profit doing art. My art school didn't really teach much about professional practice. We got virtually nothing about working with a gallery or even putting together a professional level portfolio. I only learned that by going out and doing it and sometimes doing it wrong. We also only got a foundation in technique. It was really heavy on theory and that's good if you're going to go and try to do "high art". Perhaps I just went to a crappy art school (entirely possible), but I walked away a little bit damaged by the experience.
 
I went to art school and managed to make a profit doing art. My art school didn't really teach much about professional practice. We got virtually nothing about working with a gallery or even putting together a professional level portfolio. I only learned that by going out and doing it and sometimes doing it wrong. Perhaps I just went to a crappy art school, but I walked away a little bit damaged by the experience.

sorry to hear that yw, can i ask how long ago this was? professional context and practice is something they've been driving into us from the very start of my degree (even on the not-so-shit-hot-course)
 
Ok, showing my age here, but it was the early to mid-80s.

i'm the last person to defend tuition fees but ime the expectations of kids who are signing up for a lifetime's debt are quite stringent in terms of what they're getting out of a course.

(i think you're us? so the fee thing may not hold for your experience tbf... )
 
I've just signed up for a new online class on drawing faces from different angles and expressions.. hoping it will be fun and informative.. but someone told me that going to life drawing classes was one of the best ways to accelerate learning etc..

I cannot agree with this more! Life drawing is so very helpful. You want to start out with a good instructor who will teach you the basics, and then after a while you can just start going to the ones where there is no real "instructor" and you just work on your own objectives.
I need to start going to life drawing sessions again, after I move. I like to go with watercolors and ink & stuff. More fun that way :)
 
i'm the last person to defend tuition fees but ime the expectations of kids who are signing up for a lifetime's debt are quite stringent in terms of what they're getting out of a course.

(i think you're us? so the fee thing may not hold for your experience tbf... )

I was a scholarship student at a mid-western land-grant school so my choices were pretty much "take it or leave it." Someone who went to the Art Institute of Chicago would probably have an entirely different opinion.
 
I was a scholarship student at a mid-western land-grant school so my choices were pretty much take it or leave it. Someone who went to the Art Institute of Chicago would probably have an entirely different opinion.

from what I know art schools here are becoming more focused on all of that which wayward bob mentioned. I know a 19 yr old who is going to the same art school that I went to, and they seem much more results driven. Along with the new regulations coming from outside, I think this also may have to do with most art schools having graphic design departments which are far more business-focused, and it's bled into the other departments as well. Just my theory, though.
 
from what I know art schools here are becoming more focused on all of that which wayward bob mentioned. I know a 19 yr old who is going to the same art school that I went to, and they seem much more results driven. Along with the new regulations coming from outside, I think this also may have to do with most art schools having graphic design departments which are far more business-focused, and it's bled into the other departments as well. Just my theory, though.

That sounds promising. :)
 
tbf my current plan is to make a machine that will draw for me :cool::D

turkgal2.jpg
 
heh :cool: but not quite what i'm after. my plan is basically a completely analogue "laser cutter" (in effect it will only etch not cut cos i live in wales not egypt :mad:) no motors or anything, possibly clockwork...
 
i do think it's a kind of initiation rite - the whole mark-making/life drawing thing - i can see why, but at the same time i can see equally good reasons why not. my experience with all of this stuff is that talking the talk really does matter, because if you can do that - and by that i literally just mean explain yourself genuinely, rather than making excuses - then they let you do whatever the hell you want. ime, at least :thumbs :
 
i do think it's a kind of initiation rite - the whole mark-making/life drawing thing - i can see why, but at the same time i can see equally good reasons why not. my experience with all of this stuff is that talking the talk really does matter, because if you can do that - and by that i literally just mean explain yourself genuinely, rather than making excuses - then they let you do whatever the hell you want. ime, at least :thumbs :

I gotta get off this thread and back to work, really :facepalm: but in hindsight, I have to say that was the most valuable part of art school and design school. Learning how to talk about your work means learning how to analyze it and to see it from outside of your own experience with it. It teaches you not just to see it in terms of your own experience, but that of others as well.
It teaches how to analyze your own processes and your own shortcomings and strengths.

I think this, perhaps more than anything, prepares one for a career in art, or in many other professional areas. Being able to assess your own work and see the value of it is a really, really valuable skill.
 
I gotta get off this thread and back to work, really :facepalm: but in hindsight, I have to say that was the most valuable part of art school and design school. Learning how to talk about your work means learning how to analyze it and to see it from outside of your own experience with it. It teaches you not just to see it in terms of your own experience, but that of others as well.
It teaches how to analyze your own processes and your own shortcomings and strengths.

I think this, perhaps more than anything, prepares one for a career in art, or in many other professional areas. Being able to assess your own work and see the value of it is a really, really valuable skill.
Yes.
 
I wonder whether people separate Roger Dean's art from their view of the music he designed the cover art for. Same with the gaming art work as well I guess.
 
Hmmmm? Well?

_1044375_glenn300.jpg
Possibly because the Turner prize judges are looking at modern art as purely and exclusively conceptual....as in conceptualism.

Here's some more excellent digital art ..
amazing-digital-art-02.jpg

not sure what my own artwork has to do with anything. my own artwork is rarely conceptual. doesn't mean I can't appreciate many different forms of art.

Was just interested in your art.


also, it might very well have been because there would be no one there to instruct them (the students using programming to produce art)...you can't really accept students to a program which doesn't exist.

No...it boiled down to a lack of joined up thinking...and a lack of cooperation between departments....and an over competitiveness between departments...and there was an element of "fashion a step above graphics"..
Thevgraphics dept had a programming option, staff...etc.
It probably doesn't matter now.....I used it as an example of how things can go one way or the other depending on the attitudes of those in charge.
 
Back
Top Bottom