Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
I love my CX55s. £20, great sound, mine have lasted ages.
Got a pair of Sennheiser CX 300-II, great headphones. I swear by Sennheiser now, the best headphones for the price range by far ime...
I love my CX55s. £20, great sound, mine have lasted ages.
Is that it then as far as new shiny things getting announced; no make over on the MacPro, free mobile-me, air update, mac-mini's or that touch pad thing?
No idea. They've released a new Safari so I guess it's possible that there may be some new stuff coming....
I lost my bookmarks when I installed that
Better get round reimporting them from Firefox.
Apple revises iOS rules on outside advertisers, cuts out Google, Adobe by implication
Apple and Google's newfound rivalry in the mobile advertising space was already pretty interesting to watch as it stood, and it looks like things just got more interesting still. As expected following Steve Jobs' comments at D8 last week, Apple has now revised its rules on advertising in iOS to allow outside advertisers to collect stats for ads, but the company has included some language in the new rules that seems to effectively cut out Google's AdMob.
While it obviously doesn't mention Google by name, only "independent" advertising providers can collect tracking stats, and Apple says that any "advertising service provider owned by or affiliated with a developer or distributor of mobile devices, mobile operating systems or development environments other than Apple would not qualify as independent."
That would seem to not only affect AdMob, but Adobe and Greystripe's just-announced effort as well, considering it specifically mentions companies affiliated with "development environments other than Apple." We told you things would get interesting. Head on past the break for the complete relevant section.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/08/apple-revises-ios-rules-on-outside-advertisers-cuts-out-google/
Crispy said:That will go to court
Well EU competition laws for one...
Existing iPhone 3GS owners on O2, who want to upgrade to the iPhone 4 on June 24, are to be charged £20 per month remaining on their contract.
At least, according to an anonymous tip off Pocket-lint has just received by email: "...Wanted to give you a heads up. O2's 'deal' in the UK will be to offer existing 3GS customers an option to buy out their existing contracts for £20 per month that remains. Whether the handset will invoke a cost on top of that I don't know."
Now, while we can't validate that information at present, we have contacted industry insiders who believe that this is plausible: "Given O2's recent network issues, the move could be O2 desperately trying to cling on to the customers they currently have," a well-qualified source told us.
Should it be true, it's also great news for the first wave fanboys who, if they signed 18-month contracts last time around, will only need to pony up an extra £120 on top of any handset cost.
Considering their dedication, that means they can get the 32GB iPhone 4 for around £370, if the price of the device is £250 as expected. It seems a lot, but nowhere near the sums forked out last year.
http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/33601/o2-pound20-upgrade-iphone-4
More:
How Apple's new ad-blocker could save the media (maybe)
Safari 5 looks like bad news for ad-supported sites. But if we're very, very lucky, it might not turn out that way
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2010/jun/09/apple-ad-blocker-save-media
eh?Anyone, who uses ANY type of adblocker is an asshole.
Anyone, who uses ANY type of adblocker is an asshole.
@ KE: Apple is creating a restricted and protected space for ad tracking that favours his own product, ergo it's anti-competitive practice because it prevents 3rd parties from accessing information on a like-for-like basis.
Why do you think Microsoft got done for including IE in its OS?It's only doing that on the product it owns, it's not doing that on other products from what I can tell.
Again, how does this restrict choice in the market place when punters can go buy a Web OS, RIM, Windows Series 7 or Android device (and plenty of each too)?
How did they have a monopoly on OSs? You could buy Mac, Linux etc etc., and were free to install any browser you liked on Windows.MS's position was different though, they had monopoly on operating systems. Apple does not have monopoly on smartphones - I see what KE is saying
How did they have a monopoly on OSs? You could buy Mac, Linux etc etc., and were free to install any browser you liked on Windows.