Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Apple iPad and related items

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks like you can forget abut tethering your iPhone to your iPad:

This isn't so much news as it is a public service announcement: even in markets where iPhone tethering has launched, you've never been able to use it to connect to an iPad, and you won't be able to when AT&T flips the switch on tethering with the release of OS 4. That's clearly not AT&T's fault, it's Apple's -- the iPhone inexplicably supports only USB and Bluetooth for sharing its internet connection, even though jailbroken apps like MyWi prove that a WiFi connection is totally doable and countless other handsets already support WiFi routing. And iPad doesn't support using another device as a Bluetooth modem, either. And as long as you're paying the tethering fee, there's no reason why AT&T wouldn't want you tethering the iPad; you'll certainly be able to do it with any phone in AT&T's lineup that can create a WiFi hotspot, after all, and we're sure they'd be happy to take your overage cash once you hit 2GB regardless of the device you're using to gobble the data.

In the meantime, you know what you can tether to an iPad? A phone running Froyo, for one -- Google was certainly happy to show off that capability back at IO. Or pretty much any device running S60 from the last several years. Or a Palm Pre Plus... yeah, you get the idea.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/03/same-as-it-ever-was-you-cant-tether-an-iphone-to-the-ipad/

http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/06/att_no_iphone-ipad_tethering.html

:facepalm:
 
If you've got a 3G one it's no issue though right? I mean, I don't see the point of the wifi only one and don't expect it to last as a product line...
 
If you've got a 3G one it's no issue though right? I mean, I don't see the point of the wifi only one and don't expect it to last as a product line...
But equally, what is the point of the 3G one if you're only ever going to use it at home? I don't need a 3G iPad - on the very odd occasion I might take it away somewhere with me, it'll either be abroad (insanely expensive) or somewhere I can find some wifi fairly easily.
 
I didnt go for a 3G one because of the speed & cost of 3G. Lack of internet anywhere will only bother me about 5-10% of the time.

As for tethering, it will influence my next choice of phone but not sure it will be a dealbreaker. Mind you I will only consider android if they add hardware accelerated css transforms to their browser.
 
Ive been trying the Wired magazine app - he it really shows up the weaknesses of magazines in general. Reading it on the same device that can pick up the wider internet, I am really struck by the lack of length & depth of articles, and the large quantity of fullpage adverts that I have to flick through.
 
Ive been trying the Wired magazine app - he it really shows up the weaknesses of magazines in general. Reading it on the same device that can pick up the wider internet, I am really struck by the lack of length & depth of articles, and the large quantity of fullpage adverts that I have to flick through.
I think most magazines are fine as they are - it's still the best format for reading and flicking through articles and it's far easier to ignore ads.

Transferring them wholesale to an electronic tablet is where they fall down. People tend to read electronic devices differently to conventional print media and there's an expectation with the shiny new iPad for magazine apps to do more and be all interactive and exciting.

The mags I've seen on an iPad so far have been very underwhelming and sourcing all that extra whizz-bang content may make it an expensive and/or uneconomic prospect for publishers.
 
I wouldn't mind a plain old PDF of the print version, which can't cost them much at all
 
I wouldn't mind a plain old PDF of the print version, which can't cost them much at all
Steve Jobs wouldn't like that as other platforms would be able to access the content and the publishers would probably insist on it being DRM'd to fuck.
 
Ach, new content will come though - there's the market size to develop for it already, no mean feat. From our company's point of view, the ipad app is already proving very popular - people tend to linger around 4 times longer than the same content via the 'conventional' website according to earlier metrics.

What's clear is that it's a challenging time for publishers. There isn't going to be a goldrush for them. In fact it reminds me a little bit of the early days of CDR content, where publishers rushed to put the same content in much the same way onto CD and (unsurprisingly) and didn't impress many or make sales. Only more inventive and involved designs proved more popular.

Clearly the ipad offers something fundamentally more involving with navigation and format that CD, but the challenge for publishers remains similar - how to customise their content so that it becomes genuinely attractive. No doubts there'll be more than a little consolidation in the publishing industry as the costs of this reformatting become apparent - as usual with the net, expect a handful of dominant players to develop.
 
Steve Jobs wouldn't like that as other platforms would be able to access the content and the publishers would probably insist on it being DRM'd to fuck.
Steve jobs can do nothing about it - there's already all sorts of content offered this way via in-app purchase. The file doesn't have to come via the web, for all to plunder.
 
Steve jobs can do nothing about it - there's already all sorts of content offered this way via in-app purchase. The file doesn't have to come via the web, for all to plunder.
And what would stop people forwarding the PDF formatted mag straight off their iPad to all and sundry?
 
a)The lack of a 'forward this thing I just paid for' button in the mag's app, and
b)The lack of a file explorer to root through an app's filestore, and (probably)
c)DRM encapsulation for the file to make scraping it from a jailbroken phone more difficult

There are already comicbook apps in the store that let you download the latest Marvel, DC etc. comics for a couple of quid a piece - that's the business model I'm talking about.
 
There are already comicbook apps in the store that let you download the latest Marvel, DC etc. comics for a couple of quid a piece - that's the business model I'm talking about.
It's a bit clumsy alright, but it looks like some piracy has already started up...
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?id=25745&page=article

And some in the industry are already voicing concerns:
With new technology comes new threats. Will comics be able to be traded and uploaded to an iPad as easily as other files? It may be inevitable that comic piracy will become more prevalent, with more fans turning to bit torrent to get what they want for free. I have heard more than one fan in our store bragging how they just downloaded entire runs of comics.

If the actual physical sales of comics take a hit, it may be only a matter of time, and a bit of nerve on a major publishers part, to go Internet only. It reminds me of when Marvel bought Heroes World with the attempt to cut out the middleman in distribution, and we all know how that turned out. But that's not to say they won't try it again in the future...

http://www.newsarama.com/comics/the-Q-retailers-ipad-100408.html
More: http://bookbee.com.au/index.php/201...ics-destroy-comic-book-shops-or-boost-piracy/
 
Comicbook piracy has been around for years already and one of the first comics apps of the ipad was for reading the common .cbr format used for such piracy. What the official apps provide is a very user-friendly, high quality, speedy service (and higher resolution than 768x1024, zooming in is important!)

Music piracy exists and yet, somehow, those crazy guys at iTunes are making shedloads of cash selling DRM-free music. Same reasons.

There is no reason why other print media cannot follow the same model, apart from inertia, which is what hurt the music industry first time round.
 
There is no reason why other print media cannot follow the same model, apart from inertia, which is what hurt the music industry first time round.
I can think of other reasons why some magazines may be reluctant to jump into bed with Steve Jobs: his moral censorship campaign being one of them.

German publishers have told Apple's Steve Jobs to stop behaving like a Nazi censor.

A group of German magazine publishers have been trying to get Jobs to negotiate on the handling of applications for iPad and iPhone.

The Association of German Magazine Publishers (VDZ) and the international umbrella organization FIPP have written to Jobs to discuss the regulation of the content in the AppStore.

The letter said that the world is multicultural and content that is in a country totally acceptable in another seem to be inappropriate.

To set uniform rules for the whole world is a restriction of press freedom and freedom of choice for readers.

Publishers have always criticized Apple's rigid rules for the acceptance of applications and talking about censorship. It also is miffed about how much of a slice that Apple takes from advertising.

They are also worried that while mobile devices are good for paid content, provider of technology platforms, having Steve Jobs telling them what they can publish is interfering with the role of media house...

http://www.techeye.net/internet/germany-tells-apple-to-stop-censoring

More: http://gizmodo.com/5490310/its-time-to-declare-war-against-apples-censorship
 
Clearly the ipad offers something fundamentally more involving with navigation and format that CD, but the challenge for publishers remains similar - how to customise their content so that it becomes genuinely attractive. No doubts there'll be more than a little consolidation in the publishing industry as the costs of this reformatting become apparent - as usual with the net, expect a handful of dominant players to develop.

I think there are still big questions about how much 'multimedia' and touch interaction can actually improve the experience. Its quite hard to come up with things that arent simply gimmicks. The web in general has evolved to the point where benefits can sometimes be seen from the use of video clips, audio, photo galleries and the occasional interactive chart/map. But it doesnt always add much, and traditional publishers of the written word can struggle to make compelling video. And a lot of stuff is still best consumed in a fairly linear way with minimal interaction required.
 
I agree, they need much clearer rules (and to stick to them) about what content is and is not allowed via in-app purchases.
 
If urban75 was a mag it would almost certainly be banned from the AppStore. If the iPad is the future, then that's of some concern.
 
I think there are still big questions about how much 'multimedia' and touch interaction can actually improve the experience. Its quite hard to come up with things that arent simply gimmicks. The web in general has evolved to the point where benefits can sometimes be seen from the use of video clips, audio, photo galleries and the occasional interactive chart/map. But it doesnt always add much, and traditional publishers of the written word can struggle to make compelling video. And a lot of stuff is still best consumed in a fairly linear way with minimal interaction required.
I'm a gadget freak but I'm happy to concede that the best way to read a book or a magazine remains in print.
 
I'm a gadget freak but I'm happy to concede that the best way to read a book or a magazine remains in print.

Well that wasnt quite the point I was trying to me, although I can see why many are of that opinion. I was just saying that beyond the core advantages of getting stuff digitally, there isnt always much apparent value to trying to add different sorts of navigation & content to the mix. If I preferred to read stuff on paper then I doubt I would have felt the need to buy an ipad at all.

As for my general experience and impressions of the ipad after a week of ownership, Im as impressed as the first day I bought it. The only issue Im having at the moment is that Ive spent so many years glued to a computer whilst sitting at a desk, that its taking me a while to adjust my routine so that I actually use my ipad more. Every day I am getting a little better at this, but have a long way to go.

As for the impressions of other people who have seen my ipad, I have avoided gratuitously waving it around but the few times it has come out in public at work it has generated considerable interest, more than when I first got an iphone. The price certainly puts people off and some have gotten sad when I tell them it does not completely replace their laptop.
 
I haven't used my desktop computer to browse the net all week :) Feels very nice, and I find myself bimbling round the house with it - quite unlike a laptop. Sparrow's always had her macbook, but it really behaves like a desktop that changes table maybe twice a day (and has to bring its power adapter along just in case). I used mine solidly, from hometime till bedtime last night, including several hours of music making and an episode on iplayer, and there's still just under 50% battery. No regrets splashing out on it, it's very nice indeed :)
 
I'm a gadget freak but I'm happy to concede that the best way to read a book or a magazine remains in print.

It still is and technology might like to think it can take its place but there is a long way to go before I put down a book and read it on an ebook.

Currently my use for an ebook is travelling and for reference manuals. This is giving up some things that I like about books for weight and searchability reasons.
 
I used Crispy's last night. It's is really really nice. Yes, it's a big iPod touch and maybe a little heavier than I expected but the screen and interface really makes for such a nice natural touch experience.
 
Oh and it's not an iPad point particularly but getting one persuaded me to try MobileMe and it is utterly fab.

Have changed my mind about MobileMe - turns out it doesn't work if you want to also synchronise using Microsoft Exchange Server.

So:

iPhone <-> MobileMe = great
iPad <-> MobileMe = great
iMac <-> MobileMe = great
but Work PC <-> MobileMe = no go

That means I have to sync contacts and calendars between iPad/iPhone and the work PC using Microsoft Exchange Server. This results in different calendar/contact entries on the iPad/iPhone depending on the sync method.

Would be OK if I could sync the iMac with Microsoft Exchange Server but we have 2003 at work and that's not compatible with Snow Leopard which only works with 2007.

I shall reluctantly have to stick with Plaxo.
 
Got one. :cool: 16Gb wifi model in the end.

The kids absolutely love it - I think it's going to end up being an entertainment machine more than anything else.
 
Got one. :cool: 16Gb wifi model in the end.

The kids absolutely love it - I think it's going to end up being an entertainment machine more than anything else.

Have to say one thing I really thought was quite neat was the way you can play scrabble on it with your letters kept on your iPhone. :cool:
 
Yay I have spent a day stumbling around trying to replicate the sorts of things the various apps do with being able to swipe fullscreen photos, but using css transforms & transitions in the browser rather than a native app. I knew it should turn out pretty smooth and Im very happy with the results.

Here is a test for ipad in landscape mode. It isnt doing anything clever in terms of loading the images as it goes, and its a bit of a botch job really but it demonstrates that smooth animation in the browser is pretty achievable on the ipad, as expected.

http://padapt.com/s/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom