tony.c
Well-Known Member
Less and less these days fortunately.And how it works in most of the world.
Less and less these days fortunately.And how it works in most of the world.
if people are smoking in it and you dont like it then dont go into it, its pretty simple. And how it works in most of the world.
Or liberation.thats called imperialism
And the people who don't smoke who have to breathe smoke in?im opposed to the anti smoking laws. I think a grown adult should have a choice when they go into a pub whether they smoke or not, or whether they go in or not. And pubs shpuld be able to choose whether they permit or not. Like they have done since pubs were first invented.
They arent health spas, they arent gyms. Theyre pubs. There is fuck all in there thats good for you. And adults should simply have a choice. Its a ridiculous law, its like your mum or your schoolteacher following you into the pub . I wholeheartedly agree with farages opposition to it, not just as a smoker but as a grown adult . And if we are going to be consistently left wing then Smirnoff Diageo and wetherspoons need banned too then. Because thats bad for you .
Yeah 'if you don't like it fuck off and get another job' is a great left wing position.fine, so before you work there the publican has to tell you whether or not its a smoking or non smoking pub. And if its a health and safety issue then concerned staff can even be issued with full face 3M masks like I have to wear at work for health and safety issues.
They should count themselves lucky - on another thread he's justifying the real life torture and murder of someone with different politics.Yeah 'if you don't like it fuck off and get another job' is a great left wing position.
And face masks, in a pub, really?
tony.c said:You have a choice whether you drink alcohol or not. You don't get secondary liver damage because of other people drinking. That's the difference.
And you don't come out of a pub smelling of someone else's booze. Unless they've spilled it on you, or thrown it over you.
I don't have a Tardis, but I do have a memory, and I remember coming out of pubs with my clothes stinking like an ashtray.You don't with cigarettes either. Unless you travelled to the pub in a time machine.
tony.c said:I don't have a Tardis, but I do have a memory, and I remember coming out of pubs with my clothes stinking like an ashtray.
a pubs no place for kids. If you want some socially la dee deh healthfood creche of a pub then go to one. People who want something different should have that choice too .
thats called imperialism
And the people who don't smoke who have to breathe smoke in?
Or clutching at contrarian straws. You might to look at the Institute for Ideas; you'd keep all your desired 'edginess', minus the third international baggage...give it a go, you might like it.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
Or liberation.
they can go out and sit in the little fucking bantustans outside they created for us and we will leave them alone . If they like fresh air that much they should go out and sit in it . Breathe it in to their little hearts content.
they can go out and sit in the little fucking bantustans outside they created for us and we will leave them alone . If they like fresh air that much they should go out and sit in it . Breathe it in to their little hearts content.
Oh I see now; the whole thing is just an act. Apologies for the intrusion; I'll leave you alone with your pretend anger and fag end soviet nostalgia.
Cheerio - Louis MacNeice
Why should non smokers be inconvenienced? The default state of being is that people don't smoke and don't breathe out the refuse. Surely if that's what you want to do, that's your responsibility to process.
I really don't see how anyone can argue about personal freedom, as Farage liekes to do, when you're making the immediate environment unpleasant for others.
If cigarettes were entirely self contained, I'd have no problem.
how difficult is this for you to understand ? In other parts of europe grown adults have a choice. Its as simple as that. Theres only one pub over here I can still smoke in. Another that sort of let you after 12 oclock. One I was in last week with over 30 people in the smoking area and about 4 in the bar..bloody ridiculous. Id simply like that choice to be widened.
Nothing to with nostalgia, I can still actually do it of occasion. But if I was in Berlin I could do it all the time, because the ban wasnt accepted.
Nothing to do with the soviets. Everything to do with people having an actual say and being able to retain one of lifes small pleasures.
im after telling you i do do it in bars..as do a lot of others ...can you read ?
thats called imperialism
Lenin was vehemently anti smoking once he packed in. He didn't allow smoking in the train from Lac de Genève to the Finlandski Vokzal. Edmund Wilson said so.
James the first of England was also notoriously anti-smoking. As evidenced in his piece 'a counterblast to tobacco'