I should have said illegal IMMIGRANT. Its not the person that is illegal it is what they have done which is illegal. I should have clarified that.
I beleive you did it as it's become a shorthand for those who some people view as undersireable. not due to a typo. intresting use of social conditioning really when you think about it.
I've got plenty of compassion for those suffering. I believe that those fleeing oppression have a greater right to enter the UK than those who are here for economic reasons. I've supported charities, community projects and have always tried to walk that extra mile. However, that doesn't mean that an individual or a nation or a community should consent to having the piss taken out of them.
compassion has no conditions attached to it, nor is it based on a worthness valuation. both of which you have done here.
My guess is it was more a case of doing what you beleived was right rather than knowing what you beleived was right.
to paraphrase thatcher 'it's all very well to have these opinions or poltics if they come from conviction...' oddly she was talking about blair, but it seems to apply to you as well.
we're not despite everything we are still one of the richest nations in the world the majority if not all that wealth has been amassed as any one know through the exploitation of those countries less well off than ourselves.
The number one place for refugees at the moment is from ?
Iraq the second place Afghanistain...
find that conicidence odd we bomb them we kill them we inflict total socital break down on them and suddenly they want to leave.
For years I was the first to speak out in favour of the percieved rights of immigrants to enter the uk on an open borders basis and the workshy not to work. What has changed is I've seen that I was utterly and terribly wrong to hold those views. It takes knocks to remove naiveity. I've seen too many tossers who really should be on a fucking chain gang somewhere or being pelted with rotten fruit in the local stocks getting away with so much whether it be crimes committed or benefits scrounged.
they aren't on benifits.
a total fabrication which time in time out you have been shown to be wrong about.
If they have leave to remain then like all other citizens they are full entitled to utilise our social services as is every other citizen, unless you have some deep seated racist.
All the while I've seen this going on I've seen the decent people the people who care for their children, the people who work, the people who put out for their local communities, the people who were the backbone of their local union branch, community groups all shat up on and told to fuck off while nothing was done to either punish the wrongdoer or reward the deserving who are struggling while the undeserving flourish.
so the system is wrong and the solution is to prevent the least able to help themselves from entering until this is sorted...
sorry mate you can't come in i appreacate your dyding but we have problems of our own...
I'm alright jack pull the ladder up... and all that...
Thats your opinion and you are welcome to it.
i think you'll find it's a general consenious ...
The problem is is not that I'm wrong per se its just that those of a naive persuasion especially on here tell me I'm wrong.
translation:
I'm so arrogantly invested in my own rhetoric i couldn't possible listen to more reasoned points of view because it would force me to confront my own problems with forginers and how i deal with them that's all you are saying here...
The sort of leftism talked up on here has very little of what all political groupings should have which is common sense.
I wouldn't know i'm not left wing. I'm just not a bigot either. and it's utterly nonsensical to say the poor impoverished of the world should be barred from entry because the petty nationals are afraid of their different cultures.
How exactly do you square your supposed liberation sexually with your deep seated right wing views.
