Cop who hit Tomlinson has a suspected heart attack
- Thread starter blues
- Start date
cliche guevara
Well-Known Member
Surprise surprise.
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Karma. 
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Did tarannau and his colleagues just go on a rampage that left one person dead and hundreds seriously injured then? The rotters..
Fuck you and your colleagues.
Good this stereotyping, isn't it ...
What stereotyping you dappy idiot? We got to see in glorious technicolour the character of the officer in question - shoving a man with his arms in his pockets to the floor from behind, possibly with a bit of baton action thrown in.
How much more evidence do you need before you conclude the guy was a cunt unsuitable for policing the streets? Why make excuses for the inexcusable?
I repeat: fuck the officers concerned and fuck you for your usual shallow apologist bollocks. You serve no purpose other than snide comments and fatuous insults these days DB.
maomao
普費斯
Fuck you and your colleagues.
Good this stereotyping, isn't it ...
Why? Did tarranau pull off a cowardly assault on an old man from behind while his colleagues stood around and did nothing?
I understood the phrase 'and his colleagues' to refer to those involved, not all coppers everywhere.
One cop has done something stupid. Does this make all coppers just as bad?
One nigger robs a granny. Kick them all out of the country?
Stereotyping is easy, isn't it?
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
DB, for a while you were a voice of reason. Now it seems you're just another pig apologist. You lot always stick together when you fuck up. You lot lie, people die.
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
It does when twenty colleagues, the IPCC, and the coroner collude in trying to keep the assault under wraps, and release a series of lies to the media to try and make it look like a tragic accident, the fault of the protesters, or his own fault.
This is systemic, and you'd have to be an idiot or a pig to think otherwise.
WHICH "shallow apologist bollocks"?
(I have merely (as usual) pointed out that there are some things that we do not know, that there are some explanations which could be given and may be justifiable and that it is only a fool (like you) who rushes in on the basis of an initial impression and comes to a solid conclusion about what happened). I do not know what happened and I am not willing to make a judgment about whether it was justifiable until I do.
FACT 1: You are prejudiced.
FACT 2: You apply that prejudice to every situation which confronts you.
FACT 3: You reach an instant and immovable conclusion based on your prejudices.
FACT 4: You refuse to even consider anything which does not accord with your prejudices.
FACT 5: You are a prick.
Agent Sparrow
the age of slippers and migraines
One cop has done something stupid. Does this make all coppers just as bad?
One nigger robs a granny. Kick them all out of the country?
Stereotyping is easy, isn't it?
Come on, I see the point you think you're making, but is that word really necessary in this context?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Today db loses the last few defenders he had on this board.
WHICH "shallow apologist bollocks"?
(I have merely (as usual) pointed out that there are some things that we do not know, that there are some explanations which could be given and may be justifiable and that it is only a fool (like you) who rushes in on the basis of an initial impression and comes to a solid conclusion about what happened). I do not know what happened and I am not willing to make a judgment about whether it was justifiable until I do.
FACT 1: You are prejudiced.
FACT 2: You apply that prejudice to every situation which confronts you.
FACT 3: You reach an instant and immovable conclusion based on your prejudices.
FACT 4: You refuse to even consider anything which does not accord with your prejudices.
FACT 5: You are a prick.
So that's a lot of hot air then.
What more evidence do I need to see before it's fair to conclude that a police officer shoved a man entirely unnecessarily from behind - a violent, cowardly action that was always likely to cause a heavy fall or injury.
Where the fuck is my prejudice in this then? I see more evidence that you're far too quick to leap to your ex-colleagues defence if anything.
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
is english not your first language?
maomao
普費斯
He's severely dyslexic. Bond = bound.
8ball
Decolonise colons!
Once him and all his mates have had fatal heart attacks I might start coming round to that line of reasoning.
Monkeygrinder's Organ
Dodgy geezer swilling vapid lager
Maybe he was disrespecting them.
I suspect DB's disappeared, coward-like, only to reappear the next time there's a controversy involving the OB.
He's been massively predictable mind. Come in all guns blazing, calling for 'higher' proof, aggressively slandering those who he disagrees with ("prejudice', 'prick' etc ) instead of admitting any culpability and generally closing ranks. He's out of the force, but he's as limited in mind and outlook as ever.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Despite our very effective training.
Similar threads
