Impulse Devices sells its equipment for $250,000. But such devices are just a stepping stone to the systems that Tessien believes will one day free the world of its dependency on oil and coal. Sonofusion spheres measuring a few feet in diameter, he predicts, will soon lift the living standards of remote Chinese and African villages. If he's right, great things would grow from small bubbles.
Apart from the fact that this is a desperately obvious follow on/call out from a loonspud thread, unless you actually have an opinion to offer this thread's a waste of time.Jonti said:This is the thread to discuss cold fusion. Usual rules of rational discourse to be followed.
That's two years old. How about this:Jonti said:Thanks. Found this at Business Week Online, here.
Is there a point to this thread, btw?Doubts about the truthfulness of claims of positive observations have arisen within the Nuclear Engineering faculty of Purdue University. Because of extremely serious concerns, Purdue has initiated a review of the research, to be conducted by Purdue's Office of the Vice President for Research. In a March 9 article headed "Purdue probes 'cold fusion' fraud claim", Nature journal reported that it had interviewed several of Taleyarkhan's colleagues who suspect something is amiss.
Reuters , March 2006
My interest in science is more to do with fact than opinion.unless you actually have an opinion to offer this thread's a waste of time.
Strange then that your thread-starting, opening post contained no facts whatsoever about cold fusion then, isn't it?Jonti said:My interest in science is more to do with fact than opinion.
Face it, you've been rumbled on this one.Jonti said:Not if I expect readers here to know stuff I don't, and be willing to share it.
Is Ed drunk?editor said:Face it, you've been rumbled on this one.
Jonti said:Is Ed drunk?
Yes, of that I've no doubt. Not bad myself. But we all make mistakes sometimes. And errors are far more likely when the judgement is impaired.laptop said:Don't know. Doesn't matter.
He's very experienced at troll detection, drunk or sober.
I'd be careful posting up groundless slurs like that if I were you.Jonti said:Is Ed drunk?
So, back to this thread.Jonti said:Yes, I've that I've no doubt. Not bad myself. But we all make mistakes sometimes. And errors are far more likely when the judgement is impaired.
Wow. Now that's a UFO-tastic site and a half!Backatcha Bandit said:
Concord Monitor said:A Connecticut man with a history of theft and burglary has been charged with last year's murder of Pembroke scientist Eugene Mallove. Mallove, 56, was beaten to death in Norwich, Conn., while checking on his childhood home in what the police have called a robbery gone bad.
3 June 2005
The police have charged a second man with the murder of Pembroke scientist Eugene Mallove, who was beaten to death outside his childhood home in Connecticut last year.
28 July 2005
I started to, but i got bored waiting for the point where i was going to be offered a cut of several million dollars by a nigerian minister after i help him launder it through the UK banking system...Backatcha Bandit said:The chief science writer at MIT's news office quits in disgust over the manipulation of test data that proved that there is an 'over unity' energy release, then ends up dead, and all you want to talk about is UFO's and movies.
What the fuck has happened to this site?
Does anyone have an opinion on Mallove's 'Open Letter to the World'? Anyone actually fucking read it???
That's a little unfair. Although opinions are indeed the life blood of this site according to the posting guidelines, you're in the science part where freaks with more interest in facts than opinions hang out. Safe in our natural habitat, we can be something of a menace elsewhere. We deserve protected species status.Backatcha Bandit said:The chief science writer at MIT's news office quits in disgust over the manipulation of test data that proved that there is an 'over unity' energy release, then ends up dead, and all you want to talk about is UFO's and movies.
What the fuck has happened to this site?
Does anyone have an opinion on Mallove's 'Open Letter to the World'? Anyone actually fucking read it???
One can demonstrate a scientific principle or finding. Yet one never really obtains proof of a theory. For example, I can demonstrate the inverse square law of gravitational theory -- but not prove any particular theory of gravity. One can demonstrate the wave/particle duality of light -- but not prove any theory of how that works.test data that proved that there is an 'over unity' energy release
editor said:That's two years old. How about this:...Doubts about the truthfulness of claims of positive observations have arisen within the Nuclear Engineering faculty of Purdue University. Because of extremely serious concerns, Purdue has initiated a review of the research, to be conducted by Purdue's Office of the Vice President for Research. In a March 9 article headed "Purdue probes 'cold fusion' fraud claim", Nature journal reported that it had interviewed several of Taleyarkhan's colleagues who suspect something is amiss.
Reuters , March 2006
... possible in principle ... (but) ... so far no independent group has been able to replicate the experiment.