Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Israeli forces storm Gaza aid ship, and beat people on board. Fatalities reported.

Heard him on radio 4 repeating the same shtick: hardcore protesters, intent on violence, "they started it", links with terrorists, etc. Hoping that repeating the lie often enough will work. It certainly didn't get challenged much by the interviewer.
Same tone and attitude on the 'speak your brains' phone-in on five live this morning. campbell being very challenging to any caller who dared to dispute the official line, yet noticeably uncritical of any of the propoganda that was being parroted about why the act of piracy was somehow justifiable.
 
Who here wouldn't have beat fuck out those f13 commandos if they started attacking you?
Two points. First, for unarmed men to try to repel armed solders storming an aid vessel is an act of heroism. Second, to quote today's Guardian leader column:

there was nothing on board those ships that constituted a threat to Israel's security, so Binyamin Netanyahu's argument that his troops were acting in self-defence has no validity. They should not have been there in the first place
 
It's because the Israelis are seen as a Westernised, "modernising" force in the region. The Palestinians are "savages" who need to be "civilized", in much the same way as the Native Americans needed to be subdued and civilized by the European settlers. The parallels are startling: denial of the historical claim to the land, "reservations", client leaders that are tolerated as long as they "behave", and so on.

It is, of course, a bit of a joke given that the majority of immigration into Israel post-war has comprised of eastern and central Europeans from both the rural and urban areas with cultural practices that are distinctly non-"Western". Perhaps the "westernising" element comes from the fringe of US and European Orthodox who are so happy to make babies for eretz yisroel, but I can't see the "modernising" influence, myself. :)
In reality, that which is "western" about the state of Israel is the political system it occasionally pays attention to; the quasi-democracy. Apart from that it's as mean a kleptocracy as any of its' neighbours.
 
If you go into a situation with an item that has been adapted for or is being employed as a weapon with violent intent then that is premeditation in my book.
And the commandos did! So why aren't you condemning them for there premeditated action? Idiot.
 
So they could shoot the protestors in the balls for lols?

I don't know about you, but if some heavily armed masked gimps swung onto the deck next me, in the middle of the night off helicopter then a little bit of shocked resistance is understandable. Grabbing any old domestic item to hand in defence is not in any way premeditated.

Aggressively swinging onto the deck of a vessel, undermanned and badly planned, certainly is premeditated though. A fucking shambles only likely to end in disasted.
 
If you go into a situation with an item that has been adapted for or is being employed as a weapon with violent intent then that is premeditation in my book.
They were being boarded by commandos in the high seas. Let me quote the Guardian again,to see if it sinks in:

There was nothing on board those ships that constituted a threat to Israel's security, so Binyamin Netanyahu's argument that his troops were acting in self-defence has no validity. They should not have been there in the first place
 
aye, israel and georgia. nice that the israeli governent can't help the jews of georgia, jewish charities have to do that, but nice that they can do shit like provide them with unmanned drones.

israel also helped a holocaust denying right wing cunt of a General (who wrote a book claiming the holocaust didn't exist) take control in a south american country, i forget which, although i think it might have been guatemala ...

but i should be standing by israel ... what a terrible anti-semite i must be.

Rios Mont was supported massively by Israel.

Do you mean Peron? Israel did support him a bit but the juntas after him were supported with more arms and credit?

The Cordoba Case

On 22 July 1976, eight youth activists were arrested in the town of Cordoba by Argentinean military forces. Among the detainees was an Israeli emissary, two emissaries with dual nationality - Argentinean and Israeli - who were arrested along with their wives, and three local activists. According to Barromi, they planned to attend a seminar of a Zionist youth organization with leftist tendencies, some of whose members had left to join the guerrilla forces.56 From the perspective of the government, the seminar participants were suspected of hostility to the regime and were therefore arrested. This fact had bearing on the conduct of the embassy in working to release them.

According to Barromi, the operation was organized by Joshua Anog, then the Foreign Ministry's deputy director-general for Latin America, and conducted directly by Ambassador Ram Nirgad, who acted decisively and speedily to have the Israeli citizens released. He was "unwilling to lift a finger" with regards to the others.57 His claim was that, as the representative of the State of Israel, he was obligated to protect and aid Israeli citizens but he was not obligated to take upon himself the release of the other activists and thereby put other goals of Israel at risk. According to the ambassador, these activists put themselves at risk by their participation in a seminar of an organization that was suspected by the government of supporting the leftist underground.

Israel rescued those Jews with Israeli passports, but left the Jews without those passports to rot in military prisons.
 

What is interesting about 48 is that this was the period that saw the birth of another country on the basis of religion as nation and that country was in many ways the nemesis of Israel: Pakistan born in 47.

Both countries were born out of ideologies created by persecution. The Pakistan idea that Muslims cannot share India with Hindus and Sikhs. The Zionist idea that Jews cannot share Europe with gentiles.

Both countries were born in this idea that religious identity was enough to forge a nation. That religion was nation. To the Zionists all Jews are a nation, to the Pakistan idealists all Muslims are a nation.

The contradictions in both countries to this day contain this problem. Because religion is not nation. You can be a Muslim and a Turk or a Brit or a Persion or an Indonesian. Likewise, a person can be Jewish and British or French or whatever. But to be a Pakistani is the be a Muslim and ? To be an Israeli is to be a Jew and ?

In addition this problem of national identity and religious identity causes contradictions in the nature of the state they want. Jinnah wanted a secular state, a homeland for Muslims, but the only identity was Islam all other identities worked to tear the country apart. Remember, Bangladesh, separated by a thousand miles and totally different culture was initially part of Pakistan. The identities of various parts of Pakistan worked against the national ideal. Balluchistan in the South West shares ethnicity with parts of Iran, Pathan share identity with Afganistan, etc. The solution was to throw away the secular state as envisioned by Jinnah and to impose Islamic laws on the country. This was done in the 70s by the dicator Zia al Haq.

Likewise, the identity of Russian Jews is very different to Arab Jews or Ethiopian jews or Israeli born Jews. The political system is secular but increasingly concern is raised about the number of Arab Israelis and of course the idea of a return for Palestian refugees is ruled out specifically because it would dilute the Jewish nature of the state. The Zionist fascist Kahane spelled this out quite honestly when he said that one day Israel would have to choose between being a secular democratic state or a Jewish state. He was right. His solution of course was to scrap democracy and create a theocracy

Finally in both countries these tensions are resolved in the same manner. By hostility to their neighbours. Pakistan needs tension with India to hold people together. Likewise Israel needs tension with its neighbours to keep it's people unified under the flag.

The worst thing for both the Islamists in Pakistan or the Zionists in Israel is peace. Because then the contradictions in identity between religion and nation may come to the surface and tear those countries apart

Just a thought
 
That level of support - much of which is in their own interest anyway - doesnt really justify the extent to which the US backs them, irrespective of the consequences.

Well, this is the debate within the US ruling class. Does it justify it or not? Ultimate strategic control of future energy reserves is the aim of course - Israel could be thrown to one side but it would be a major shift.
 
conventional international law is ambiguous about this. from the israeli perspective they are allowed to blockade anyone in the international waters who represents a geniune threat. as long as they can prove this to the un security council, they are off the hook.
Except that they have to blockade from their own national waters, i.e. at the six mile limit, as they're not allowed to set a blockade in international waters, so they've shot themselves in the foot by not waiting for the flotilla to enter Israeli waters.
 
Some IDF Captain on the box saying that they were armed with paintball guns.

Why?

The same was said on ynet news. The claim was that paintball guns were used: "they were only equipped with paintball rifles used to disperse minor protests, such as the ones held in Bilin."

In Bilin, (Bi'lin village) on 28th May:
After the Friday prayer, dozens of Israeli, international, and Palestinian demonstrators marched toward the site of the Separation Wall. Upon reaching the gate, the Israeli army responded almost immediately by firing tear gas canisters directly into the crowd. They also fired sound bombs and rubber bullets at the demonstrators. Two were injured as a result: Mustafa al-Khateeb of Bil’in was skimmed on his side by a bullet, and 28-year-old Israeli photographer Edo was injured on his left leg. They were treated on the spot.
http://www.bilin-village.org/english/

The protests in Bilin village are not minor - daily the people of Bilin are subject to violence from the military. On 25th May:

This morning, as is their wont, Israeli Occupation Forces intruded into the village of Bil’in, this time there were only three to the forefront with backup behind them, when challenged they beat a retreat. This afternoon, villagers rushed to quench a fire in an olive tree sited close to the Apartheid-Annexation Wall which was deliberately set on fire by the retreating IOF, but which was unable to be saved due to the fire being set in a crevice in the trunk which smouldered throughout the day and it was only in the latter stages that the tell-tale smoke was detected. This pernicious act of economic warfare has deeply angered the villagers as many are dependent on the sale of the olive oil 700 to 800 shekels per tree annually for their livelihoods. To rub salt into their wounds and worse, after the fire was extinguished, the IOF ventured forth from behind the Wall and after detaining three activist-journalists - so as not to record their crimes, subjected the villagers to live fire, tear gas and sound bombs. Today’s destruction of the tree has alarmed the farmers in that phosphorus may have been used to unobtrusively burn the tree and olive groves may follow. So it goes in Bilin, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly, ad infinitum, in a vicious world which doesn’t care.
http://www.bilin-village.org/english/
 
Rubber bullets ain't fired out of paintball guns though. They look more like church candles than bullets to be fair

Clearly they didn't shoot dead over 10 people using paintball weapons.
 
The dead are said to have been killed with sidearms. So they didn't go in innocently with paintball guns only. They went tooled up.
 
Except that they have to blockade from their own national waters, i.e. at the six mile limit, as they're not allowed to set a blockade in international waters, so they've shot themselves in the foot by not waiting for the flotilla to enter Israeli waters.

No, they can enforce a blockade in international waters. The exact "rights" of a nation enforcing a blockade can be found here (section 67 and 93-104 are the relevant ones). One point I have not seen mentioned before is found in that document, specifically this:

The declaration or establishment of a blockade is prohibited if:

(a) it has the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential for its survival; or

(b) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete
and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade.

On (b) alone, one wonders how on earth this blockade is legal.
 
Rubber bullets ain't fired out of paintball guns though. They look more like church candles than bullets to be fair

Clearly they didn't shoot dead over 10 people using paintball weapons.

Could it be that the paintball guns they are talking about are not the same we would think of ie not round balls but actual bullet-shaped bullets filled with paint?

Because a rubber bullet filled with, say, red paint, would do a fair bit of damage.
 
Are there any grounds under which the military of one country can search a ship flagged to another country under international law?

IIRC, yes, ships can be hailed and stopped in international waters for the purposes of serving a warrant to search the vessel. There has to be probable cause. You can't just drop a squad of marine commandos onto a vessel on a whim.
 
Bizarre claims and behaviour by IDF

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/137816

An IDF source said that the poor condition of the supplies renders most of it unusable. “This once again strengthens the evaluation that the intentions of the flotilla organizers were not humanitarian in the first place,” he said.

Many of the medicines are expired and/or came in an assorted, not easily organized manner. In addition, much of the equipment is in poor condition. Despite this, it is being taken to the Kerem Shalom crossing, and will be distributed in Gaza by human rights organizations.
 
The same was said on ynet news. The claim was that paintball guns were used: "they were only equipped with paintball rifles used to disperse minor protests, such as the ones held in Bilin."

Some other pneumatic non-lethal firearm perhaps? :confused:

I'll wait until more facts are known on this but the 10 dead sure as fuck weren't shot with paint balls.

Otherwise, I agree with the Guardian extract that the troops should never have boarded in the first place. But once they did, attacking them with poles and knives was a stupid thing to do. There were no injuries (tiiao) on any of the other 5 ships stormed which begs the question, was the Marmara crewed by a group of particularly 'up-for-it' protestors. Some of the footage being shown this morning would certainly suggest so. One soldier is thrown overboard, loads get kickings, and there are reports of Israeli soldiers with knife and machete wounds.

Now if you stab an armed soldier, you are going to get shot.
 
It's such a bizarre concept that people defending themselves against armed attack on the open seas somehow "started it"

More bizarre is the idea that we are supposed to feel sorry for the poor highly trained special forces soldiers being attacked by poets and artists and intellectuals.

One thing we know about Israeli forces is they don't go in for paint guns and harsh words. This is the same IDF who bulldoze houses and use phosphorous on schools and level entire streets and sent assassins around the world. Understatement is not their style

It's obvious that this was deliberate and calculated. They are sick of these bloody activists embarrassing them and they wanted to make a statement. Come here and we will kill you. .
 
Some other pneumatic non-lethal firearm perhaps? :confused:

I'll wait until more facts are known on this but the 10 dead sure as fuck weren't shot with paint balls.

Otherwise, I agree with the Guardian extract that the troops should never have boarded in the first place. But once they did, attacking them with poles and knives was a stupid thing to do. There were no injuries (tiiao) on any of the other 5 ships stormed which begs the question, was the Marmara crewed by a group of particularly 'up-for-it' protestors. Some of the footage being shown this morning would certainly suggest so. One soldier is thrown overboard, and there are reports of Israeli soldiers with knife and machete wounds.

Now if you stab an armed soldier, you are going to get shot.

So what?

By the way, I think you mean 'raises the question', not 'begs the question'. They're two very different things.
 
Some other pneumatic non-lethal firearm perhaps? :confused:

I'll wait until more facts are known on this but the 10 dead sure as fuck weren't shot with paint balls.

Otherwise, I agree with the Guardian extract that the troops should never have boarded in the first place. But once they did, attacking them with poles and knives was a stupid thing to do. There were no injuries (tiiao) on any of the other 5 ships stormed which begs the question, was the Marmara crewed by a group of particularly 'up-for-it' protestors. Some of the footage being shown this morning would certainly suggest so. One soldier is thrown overboard, loads get kickings, and there are reports of Israeli soldiers with knife and machete wounds.

You seem to be suggesting that people should have taken over anti-helicopter weapons from another country's navy and should have shot down IDF helicopters over the Mediterranean. That would have been only other way to stop the Commandos getting on board.

Of the other ships, three were cargo ships and two were light, small vessels.
Mavi Marmara had the numbers - about 550 people - to mount collective resistance action.
 
Back
Top Bottom