Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is it wrong for an anarchist to take a supervisory/managerial job

Shevek

bldg cstles in the sky
I am just wondering what people think about an anarchist taking a supervisory/managerial job. I am thinking of especially of office based jobs where junior staff are on very low pay (12-14k). I think in something like teaching or medicine its easy to stay on the bottom rung of the ladder because you are getting a decent whack to start with but in something like office admin getting a promotion might be one way of getting off poverty wages. What do people think?
 
I am just thinking because I graduated with a degree in social anthropology. I am not really 'qualified' to do any particular job and a lot of the jobs I can do are of the office admin type. Most of these roles pay between 12-14k. Although I am an anarchist I dont neccesarily want to be stuck on poverty wages for the rest of my life. It seems a hard conundrum. If I was a doctor or a teacher I could quite happily sit at the bottom of the ladder on about 20-25k but its pretty uncomfortable when the pay you bring home is £700/month after tax. Is there anything wrong with rising up the ranks of an organisation?
 
I know an anarchist who trains people in horticulture, and he's still sound, still railing against the bosses
 
as long as you dont have the power to hire and fire its ok imo.

i'm a supervisor but all that means really is having to lock up the place every night.
 
Not that i'm an anarchist but i couldn't be a supervisor in somewhere like Asda and have to intimidate staff with ridiculous demands, flog em till they nearly drop etc, introduce arsehole Americanisation etc
 
Might be hard given that a lot of what you might be asked to do will, in theory, go against your beliefs but if you think you could do it without either giving up your beliefs or being sacked after ten minutes for not giving them up then I don't see why you shouldn't go for it.
 
I disagree, I think it depends on how you manage, and the rules upon which you are expected to manage. I see no reason why an anarchist couldn't be a manager - after all, after the revolution we will all be both managers and managed!
 
maybe we need to draw up a list of jobs which are ok for an anarchist to do and ones which aren't...

In reality, you should just ask yourself whether the job you are doing compromises your beliefs and ethical values. if it does then don't do it, if it doesn't then who cares what other people think. it sounds like you need to figure out what you believe in before you try figuring out whether it's ok to do certain jobs or not.
 
Im just thinking about being promoted within the civil service. Being a pen pusher, paper shuffler. I don't really feel as though it goes dramatically against my principles
 
maybe we need to draw up a list of jobs which are ok for an anarchist to do and ones which aren't...

In reality, you should just ask yourself whether the job you are doing compromises your beliefs and ethical values. if it does then don't do it, if it doesn't then who cares what other people think. it sounds like you need to figure out what you believe in before you try figuring out whether it's ok to do certain jobs or not.


EXACTLY THIS! I've done it all my life, and suffered awfully in the first years after graduation because it was so hard to get a job in a field that didn't compromise my ethics. These days though I've got enough experience that I don't seem to have much trouble working for organisations that make lives better.
 
its a slippery slope from anarchist to liberal. tut, tut.

you need a squat, a nearby dole office, some dogs and bits of string, and tofu burgers - that sort of thing - to retain any principles

:)
 
Im just thinking about being promoted within the civil service. Being a pen pusher, paper shuffler. I don't really feel as though it goes dramatically against my principles
You can get to an OK pay level in the civil service without becoming a manager.
 
More seriously though: I don't think there's anything intrinsically wrong with doing an organisational job, as long as the decisions that are made are fairly reached. In a group you're just playing a record-keeping and co-ordinating role, and that's handy - it means people know what's going on and how whatever project you're all working on is developing.

But in terms of real jobs, management roles are pretty much universally tied to hierarchy and involve a big slice of you telling people what to do. Even if you try to avoid that, they still know that if it comes down to it you can say "do this" and if they don't, you can get them sacked.

N.B. I am not a Proper Anarchist, I'm waffling.
 
Thats one thing that puts me off joining the anarchist federation. I get the impression that its lots of demos. I am more interested in organising within the workplace. I dont want to get arrested on a demonstration and lose my job.
 
This thead kind of sums up why I find Anarchism as a belief system a little bit naive. Unless you are willing to deprive yourself of a lot, it doesn't add up.
 
Thats one thing that puts me off joining the anarchist federation. I get the impression that its lots of demos. I am more interested in organising within the workplace. I dont want to get arrested on a demonstration and lose my job.

Yeah, that put me off too (not just AFED, any political left wing group). But, to be fair, there's not that many demos and no-one makes you go on them.
 
This thead kind of sums up why I find Anarchism as a belief system a little bit naive. Unless you are willing to deprive yourself of a lot, it doesn't add up.

I think you have to separate Anarchism from anarchist principles/beliefs here.
 
Im more interested in discussing anarchist ideas, working within trades unions as an anarchist and doing other things that dont involve confrontation with the police. I like anarchist literature and I find a lot of it quite inspiring.
 
Back
Top Bottom