gorski
customised free radical
A few more points...
If one thinks about it critically for a second: the [free] market[eer]s [financial markets in particular, leading the charge in this respect] are doing precisely that - a minute by minute assessment and decision making process in the hands of those at the controls [it could be done for all of us these days, as the technology is there]...
A virtual/real parliament that shapes all our lives. [See Chomsky, for instance.] It couldn't have been done without the political state that invented it all and allowed it all, integrated it all, changed the legislative framework to make it all possible and so forth...
It [the market] is, as we all know, still extremely irrational [and still they are allowed to keep on doing it!!] and it [the market] is no longer doing [just] its alleged intended function: being the correctional etc. mechanism.
Nowadays, they call the shots... If a policy is not liked by the twats -off they go with the money [the speculative investors] and the huge inflows and outflows of money destabilises economies as strong as those of the US and UK!
But it is not inevitable. Take the South-East Asian crisis in the 90's: SK etc. were devastated... But one Mahatir Mohamed [spit-spit, the nasty bastard that he is - and I mean it!] managed to weather the storm quite easily. He just pulled the plug on those arseholes. No big problems like in SK, with the outflow of the investments, cashing them in and repatriating all...
We all could be doing the Mahatir thing, each time the neo-libs/neo-cons/the exclusivist "elites" try to pull a fast one on the rest of us... But...
===================================================
Going back to the Neo-Lib/Neo-Con [the US, by and large, plus some of the EU elites and bankers/financiers/industrialists etc.] utopia versus the Social Democratic vision of a community, with a potential proper role for the state etc. [the "older" vision of the EU, as opposed to this, neo-lib "newer" one]: there is still a huge role for the state no one - even amongst the Neo-Libs dare question!!! Oh, yes, Keysianism is well and truly the master, even if we're gonna call it Neo-Keynsianism, i.e. Keynsianism in new clothes...
Look at the current shit in the US - who was immediately called to "lend a helping hand"? The state! And it did. To the tune of billions of taxpayers money, straight to the greedy banks etc. - which weren't doing their jobs properly. Mind, the state wasn't doing it's job either - regulating and inspecting it as it should have done!
So, now the "intimate connection" between the state and capital is revealed! Suddenly, it's "never mind the neo-lib mantra" of "less state, no subsidies, less regulation, privatisation" etc. Oh, no: now we need a big and strong state - because it's our own arses that are on the line... Call Bush!!!
As they always do. As in 25 billion a year for agro business alone, in the US. Yep, the "price stabilisation programme". Good for the US [not to mention the EU but they didn't really start the neo-lib shite, to begin with!] but no good for others. Take it away from them! Via the IMF, WB etc.
Well, guess what: forget about the charges about the "crony capitalism" in SK and such places! There is no bigger "crony capitalism" than in the US/UK etc.!
=======================================================
As for how to proceed with the EU project, involving the citizens [and gaining legitimacy] or excluding them [and getting away from a truly great project embedded deeply in a Social Democratic model]:
Is there a political will, for instance in the UK, to get the proper debate show on the road?!? Can we all, in huge numbers, especially taking the spirit of the youth with us, get seriously well informed, educated [on a much larger scale than right now is the case] and then choose in an informed manner?!?
I doubt it very much... And boy, wouldn't I love to be wrong on this one...
If one thinks about it critically for a second: the [free] market[eer]s [financial markets in particular, leading the charge in this respect] are doing precisely that - a minute by minute assessment and decision making process in the hands of those at the controls [it could be done for all of us these days, as the technology is there]...
A virtual/real parliament that shapes all our lives. [See Chomsky, for instance.] It couldn't have been done without the political state that invented it all and allowed it all, integrated it all, changed the legislative framework to make it all possible and so forth...
It [the market] is, as we all know, still extremely irrational [and still they are allowed to keep on doing it!!] and it [the market] is no longer doing [just] its alleged intended function: being the correctional etc. mechanism.
Nowadays, they call the shots... If a policy is not liked by the twats -off they go with the money [the speculative investors] and the huge inflows and outflows of money destabilises economies as strong as those of the US and UK!
But it is not inevitable. Take the South-East Asian crisis in the 90's: SK etc. were devastated... But one Mahatir Mohamed [spit-spit, the nasty bastard that he is - and I mean it!] managed to weather the storm quite easily. He just pulled the plug on those arseholes. No big problems like in SK, with the outflow of the investments, cashing them in and repatriating all...
We all could be doing the Mahatir thing, each time the neo-libs/neo-cons/the exclusivist "elites" try to pull a fast one on the rest of us... But...
===================================================
Going back to the Neo-Lib/Neo-Con [the US, by and large, plus some of the EU elites and bankers/financiers/industrialists etc.] utopia versus the Social Democratic vision of a community, with a potential proper role for the state etc. [the "older" vision of the EU, as opposed to this, neo-lib "newer" one]: there is still a huge role for the state no one - even amongst the Neo-Libs dare question!!! Oh, yes, Keysianism is well and truly the master, even if we're gonna call it Neo-Keynsianism, i.e. Keynsianism in new clothes...
Look at the current shit in the US - who was immediately called to "lend a helping hand"? The state! And it did. To the tune of billions of taxpayers money, straight to the greedy banks etc. - which weren't doing their jobs properly. Mind, the state wasn't doing it's job either - regulating and inspecting it as it should have done!
So, now the "intimate connection" between the state and capital is revealed! Suddenly, it's "never mind the neo-lib mantra" of "less state, no subsidies, less regulation, privatisation" etc. Oh, no: now we need a big and strong state - because it's our own arses that are on the line... Call Bush!!!
As they always do. As in 25 billion a year for agro business alone, in the US. Yep, the "price stabilisation programme". Good for the US [not to mention the EU but they didn't really start the neo-lib shite, to begin with!] but no good for others. Take it away from them! Via the IMF, WB etc.
Well, guess what: forget about the charges about the "crony capitalism" in SK and such places! There is no bigger "crony capitalism" than in the US/UK etc.!
=======================================================
As for how to proceed with the EU project, involving the citizens [and gaining legitimacy] or excluding them [and getting away from a truly great project embedded deeply in a Social Democratic model]:
Is there a political will, for instance in the UK, to get the proper debate show on the road?!? Can we all, in huge numbers, especially taking the spirit of the youth with us, get seriously well informed, educated [on a much larger scale than right now is the case] and then choose in an informed manner?!?
I doubt it very much... And boy, wouldn't I love to be wrong on this one...