But what I don't get is the strength of feeling that goes to the point of singling BK out for some quite strong abuse on this thread for her views, to the point of wanting to censor them - whilst not reacting strongly re the holocaust denial issue and advocating that those views go unchallenged. I just don't get it
High fives all round!
Who's next!?
Saved you a trip to the printers innit
High fives all round!
Who's next!?
I'm also glad to see that people also can aknowledge that not all sceptics of the official 911 account are henceforth deemed anti-semites or are simply parroting holocaust deniers and their anti-semitic beliefs, although there are many that clearly do.
And you ARE a Truther - or a conspiracy theorist, if you prefer; you said 9/11 was a conspiracy and the official account a fabrication and they made it happen on purpose using 'OBL' who was a 'CIA operative'.
Oh dear, it looks like Kollerstrom has vanished from UCL http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sts/staff.htm
Dunno - I'm not sure why the label "witch-hunt" is getting slapped around so liberally on this thread either, as if it applied to a "holocaust denier-hunt."
As far as I understand it, the meaning of the term, whether in Salem or in Hollywood during Mccarthyism, applies to 'witches' being hunted down and falsely accused during a time of hysteria, whereas Kollenstrom is pretty much hovering on a broomstick with a black cat on his shoulder saying "Yes, I am a witch."
Agree. It's the attempt to associate his "academic credentials" (whatever they might be) with his theories to make then seem more credible. He's a scientist not a historian - but his arguments seem to focus on the chemistry of Auschwitz, so it could lend spurious credibility to the claims.How does that matter to you? He used his academic title (obtained in a non-related field) as a means to pose as an authority in WWI history with the sole aim to underscore and administer credibility to his historical revisionism.
There is nothing valid on or about historical revisionism. On the issue of the Holocaust such is illegal in several countries.
Yes it does make it much worse because ----> see comment above and all my other comments in this thread.
salaam.
OK, I respected FMs request and remained out of the thread as my discussion with VP on 'conspiracy' was taking it off topic. It's now spent a few pages touching on the issue I was originally concerned with again.
Amen to that.
However....
I appreciate that you were saying this, with frustration towards Fela, however:
- "you said 9/11 was a conspiracy" - Whichever way you look at it; even accepting the 'official' account, it was a conspiracy by definition.
- "the official account a fabrication" - not necessarily a complete fabrication, but containing holes that coaches could be driven through.
- "they made it happen on purpose". I think it unlikely. It's not out of the question, yet on the other hand there are plenty of islamist nutcases out there willing to do these things. And it suited the U.S. Gov's agenda for such an event to take place. However 'Let it happen' is plausible enough given the evidence - multiple "failures" in intelligence, air defence etc etc.
- "'OBL' who was a 'CIA operative'" - Who the fuck knows. It's not as if there hasn't been a very close connection between the US intelligence services and Pakistani ISI for decades (who have been found to pass on money given to them by the U.S. to islamist groups). And there are historical links between the CIA and Mujahudeen that deserve attention and questioning.
So in questioning all of these things on perfectly reasonable grounds, do I also fit your criteria of "Truther"; to be erroneously written off for asking rational questions on topics that you regard as off limits? (Not to mention the implication - which admittedly a couple of people on this thread have specifically sought to avoid - that it also makes me a "fellow traveller" of Kollerstrom and his ilk).
Well done BK, I think UCL owe you one as well, for bringing this to their attention.
Swift work!
Newsworthy item too methinks!
I guess I coined the term 'witch finder general' on the thread, but I was thinking of the film tbh. And I was specifically referring to my own view of the treatment of Jazzz, well let's be clear about whether he's a holocaust denier or just a 'useful idiot' but then let's leave it at that, it ain't that important tbh.
I'm wondering whether fela saw Jazzz getting pulled up and got annoyed about that, without actually seeing how the discussion developed from there tbh. That would make sense. And then it did all get a bit fast moving, so he could have missed a few explanatory posts. I dunno.
I guess it depends on the facts you choose to accept. I dont believe any Jews were conspiring in terror attacks on NYC or London.
I guess at least any misunderstanding about what "freedom of speech" menas will have been cleared up now that Kollenstrom is apparently free to pursue Holocaust-denial full-time rather than being burdened with his affiliation with UCL.
I don't think it's fair to lump fela fan in with the "Truthers" here - he believes, from what I can tell, in some collusion happening at the highest level rather than the 'remote-controlled planes hit the WTC-controlled demolition felled the towers-that was a missile hitting the Pentagon-those were computer-generated voices calling their families' theories.
What is it with loons and the colour purple?
There's simply nowhere for someone sincerely interested in getting to the truth of the matter (or as close, or approximate to the truth as possible) to go.
I've actually tried to STOP it going in the papers, because I felt sorry for UCL and think they needed time to sort it out - they are blameless. And I don;t think the Truthers should get publicity, or a martyr.
A storm on the internet where these these people derive their comport, support and recruit their fellow travellers, fine. But I didn't think it was fair to drag UCL into it before they had a chance to act.
Which they have done, amazingly promptly. If it does get in the papers, I hope it's good publicity for UCL for acting so fast.
I guess at least any misunderstanding about what "freedom of speech" menas will have been cleared up now that Kollenstrom is apparently free to pursue Holocaust-denial full-time rather than being burdened with his affiliation with UCL.
I hope it doesn't get into the papers at all. Short term 'useful idiot' rocket martyr.
Interesting to watch this unravel though.
What is it with loons and the colour purple?
Yes there is but like with all things it shall take time before historians are able to research. The problem is that some people are too impatient and some among that group translate this into creating conspiracy theories that only cause further delay of serious process.
salaam.
I hope it does. Let's see if the martyers stand up to scrutiny.
It'll be a weekend piece - my two weeks with the loons. 10 grand please.
There is that as well. But there's the lending credence plus giving them a martyr aspect.
That's true Aldebaran. However, there's also the converse situation, where the historians finally tie it all up 50 years later when all the classified/restricted documents are eventually released. By which time no one really cares, the damage is done and the people responsible can't be held to account because they're dead.
How's that then. Can you make your point more explicit?
No one gives a fuck though, a little bit of sheen that's then blow away -they're the losers.Only freaks are even interested in this area. And there's no way they'd come out on top of public exposure. All they'd walk away with is another conspiracy against them when they look stupid. So shine that light i say.