Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job

Status
Not open for further replies.
DrRingDing said:

So you're not prepared to discuss the possibility that he may be coming from an anti-semitic bias. Totally no possibility of discussion whatsoever there then is it?

Awfully close-minded of you there, you don't seem very open to the possibilites do you? :D
 
Augie March said:
So you're not prepared to discuss the possibility that he may be coming from an anti-semitic bias.

Provide decent evidence he is anti-semitic and maybe we'll discuss.
 
I propose he is infact an angry armadillo in the shell of a nasty old man.

Would you care to discuss this? Or are you just too closed minded?
 
DrRingDing said:
I propose he is infact an angry armadillo in the shell of a nasty old man.

Would you care to discuss this? Or are you just too closed minded?

Gladly. However it has fuck all to do with the thread you started. My point had more validity in relation to the thread though don't you feel?

Provide decent evidence he is anti-semitic and maybe we'll discuss.

Hehe. A conspiracist asking for decent evidence is just priceless. :D

Provide actual, real evidence that would be submissable in a court of law, that 9/11 was a US government sponsored orchestrated attack on it's own people, instead of just the usual conjecture, assumptions and theory that you guys usually throw up, then maybe we could talk. ;)
 
Augie March said:
Provide actual, real evidence that would be submissable in a court of law, that 9/11 was a US government sponsored orchestrated attack on it's own people, instead of just the usual conjecture, assumptions and theory that you guys usually throw up, then maybe we could talk. ;)

Firstly I don't believe that an American directly sponsored the 9/11 attacks.

Bin Laden provided the cash.

Furthermore, in a murder trial where there was a substantial payout of life insurance, that insurance and amount would be used in court against the accused.

You're not very good at this are you?
 
Augie March said:
Provide actual, real evidence that would be submissable in a court of law, that 9/11 was a US government sponsored orchestrated attack on it's own people, instead of just the usual conjecture, assumptions and theory that you guys usually throw up, then maybe we could talk. ;)

Fucking lazy generalisations. A prize conformiton.
 
DrRingDing said:
Firstly I don't believe that an American directly sponsored the 9/11 attacks.

Bin Laden provided the cash.

Furthermore, in a murder trial where there was a substantial payout of life insurance, that insurance and amount would be used in court against the accused.

You're not very good at this are you?

Not true.

You see, in a murder trial you would probably require actual evidence to support any claim of guilt made against the accused. Just using the insurance pay-off as evidence against them would probably have you laughed out of court.

Is there any actual evidence to support the claims that 9/11 was a conspiracy then?
 
DrRingDing said:
Are you having a conversation with yourself?

You're definitely not listening to me.

Sorry. So I didn't reply to any part of your previous posts then?

DrRingDing said:
Furthermore, in a murder trial where there was a substantial payout of life insurance, that insurance and amount would be used in court against the accused.

Augie March said:
You see, in a murder trial you would probably require actual evidence to support any claim of guilt made against the accused. Just using the insurance pay-off as evidence against them would probably have you laughed out of court.

Is there any actual evidence to support the claims that 9/11 was a conspiracy then?

Didn't reply to that post at all then.


And this one in regards to me stating that conspiracy theorists base everything on conjecture, assumptions and theories, you said:

DrRingDing said:
Fucking lazy generalisations.

I said:

Augie March said:
So conspiracy theories are based on cold hard facts then, not conjecture, assumptions and, um... theory? Interesting

Certainly didn't make any attempt to reply to that either.

This is fun. You actually are a moron aren't you? :D
 
Don't waste your breath Augie - you're a 'conformiton' and child of the rational 'offical' media - he'll do his best to ignore you using a mixture of stupidity and childlike foolishness.

What you need to do is get Alex Jones or one of those Prison Planet gimps to make an unsourced, daft article proudly announcing "Dr Ring Ding is a big silly sausage and moron'. Old Ring Ding will then virtually fall over himself in his haste to post up a link crowing about this new 'truth'....

;)
 
tarannau said:
What you need to do is get Alex Jones or one of those Prison Planet gimps to make an unsourced, daft article proudly announcing "Dr Ring Ding is a big silly sausage and moron'. Old Ring Ding will then virtually fall over himself in his haste to post up a link crowing about this new 'truth'....

Name one post where I have referred to Alex Jones or Prison Planet.

If you can't do that, I'd kindly you ask to refrain from posting such dodgy bollocks.
 
Augie March said:
Provide actual, real evidence that would be submissable in a court of law, that 9/11 was a US government sponsored orchestrated attack on it's own people, instead of just the usual conjecture, assumptions and theory that you guys usually throw up, then maybe we could talk. ;)
Yet, when it comes to the nonsensical official story about arab hijackers who just happened to have been trained at US air force bases, couldn't fly properly, and liked strip clubs subverting a trillion dollar defence system, we don't require evidence that would stand up in a court of law do we? Because it isn't there.

Do you know that the FBI has admitted that it has no hard evidence against Osama Bin Laden for 9/11?

You guys can talk anyway... whether we can have a meaningful discussion is another matter :p
 
Jazzz said:
Yet, when it comes to the nonsensical official story about arab hijackers who just happened to have been trained at US air force bases, couldn't fly properly, and liked strip clubs subverting a trillion dollar defence system, we don't require evidence that would stand up in a court of law do we? Because it isn't there.

Do you know that the FBI has admitted that it has no hard evidence against Osama Bin Laden for 9/11?

You guys can talk anyway... whether we can have a meaningful discussion is another matter :p

Since when did the WTC have a trillion dollar defence system...? How did *that* get through congress... :confused: :rolleyes:
 
DrRingDing said:
I'm not sure who you can play, maybe Fraggle Rock are looking for new Fraggles?

I've some nice roast chesnuts if anyone wants them. And I've got some blankies and a heater if the deckchairs are too cold... :D
 
DrRingDing said:
Someone didn't do very well in geography.

Oh, and which buildings were the 9/11 hijackers trying to destroy...? And if you mean the Pentagon, I'd still be interested in when they soent a trillion dollars on the defence of it... :cool:
 
He's 'socking it to the man' with his highly amusing and entirely original jokes.

My, how I laughed when I read his 'user title' and didn't find it petty or BK related in the slightest.

He's a cutting wit and make no mistake. Only last week and he reduced himself to giggles farting in the bath! Well kewl!
 
tarannau said:
He's 'socking it to the man' with his highly amusing and entirely original jokes.

My, how I laughed when I read his 'user title' and didn't find it petty or BK related in the slightest.

He's a cutting wit and make no mistake. Only last week and he reduced himself to giggles farting in the bath! Well kewl!

No need for this bitterness, it's Friday.

Give us some love :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom