editor said:
Could you show me a single "anti Apple" sentiment that I've expressed in this thread, please?
Here's one from me.
I used to have a Powerbook G4 running Panther. It was junk.
The OS wasn't all that fantastic. Then, coming from Linux it was essentially the same under the hood. I found the lack of options on the front end dismal and missed all the wonderful free software and neat software packaging/distribution a major negative.
The wifi software had some major bugs in it and there was no way to know when they'd ever get fixed. I assumed that it wasn't going to happen until the next (paid) upgrade of the OS. Thanks, Apple.
Then there was the hardware. Looked good. Worked awfully.
The wifi speed was lousy. This was even after they'd fixed the previous problems with wifi reception being downgraded due to the machine's metal shell.
I assume the new Intel Macs are a lot faster, but the G4 was painfully slow.
The hinges on the screen broke after three months. It took two weeks for one of Apple's approved service centres to fix it under warranty. Coincidentally, that was about the time that they were pestering me to pay out about 25% of the price of the machine to extend the warranty by a further two years.
It went in the drawer after that and on eBay a few months later. Good riddance.
Summary:
- You're stuck with Apple's hardware. That's not a good thing.
- Apple's regularly frequent paid OS upgrades mean they have little incentive to make intermediate improvements, including bug fixes.
Never, ever again.
If I really wanted to run a proprietary OS, I'd choose Windows. I'd be stuck with the evils of Microsoft for the software but at least I could specify my own hardware.
The general-purpose computer as appliance is pretty much an unattainable dream, I'd say. They're so versatile and they have so many uses they need to be infinitely customisable for each user. That means hardware and software.