nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Interestingly enough, this story cannot be found elsewhere. Christian Man has used a single source for the vindication of his right wing views vis a vis The Levant and Muslims.
bluestreak said:you should try flippancy. it's better than po-faced sanctimony any day.
nino_savatte said:I am serious and I'm not sidestepping anything. Try reading and comprehending for a change instead of reading the things that you want to see.
My personal ideological beliefs have fuck all to do with this and your insistence that I declare some sort of belief smacks of you wanting to control the discourse. In that respect you are no better than mears who uses the same tactic when things get sticky for him. it's a ploy that betrays the level of your dishonesty.
Deal with it.
Christian Man said:Still the same tactic, sidestepping. Are you claiming to be void of any ethics or beliefs in societal values? Or are you just too 'shy'? Again, let me know when you want have a candid conversation.
nino_savatte said:You want to control the terms of debate, Christian Man. It's time to be honest for a change...or would you prefer I called you a liar instead?
Ninjaboy said:
surely it's a bad thing that people are leaving the middle east cos they are'nt allowed to practice their religion
i don't have any time for religious wankers of any faith, but i don't see how this has turned into a 'have a pop at christians' thread
Christian Man said:The difference in the debate is that my ethics and values are largely on the table while you want to be secretive and unopen pretenting to be 'super' human and above ethics and societal values. That is hardly terms for a fair and succesful debate and merely a sidestepping tactic.
If I wanted to control the debate I would not tell anyone about myself, personal values, and be as closed as possible so I could slither from one side of the debate to the other without any flack coming back to me.
Wrong, by insisting that a poster or posters declare their 'beliefs' is a means of controlling the discourse. Why? Because it makes your job to disseminate propaganda - such as this - easier and because you have also eliminated any opposition to your views.
You spectacularly miss the point in your last paragraph. Your ethics, such as they are, are practically in tune with those of the US right wing; it's militarists, it's Xtian fundamentalists and its neo-cons.
Just to let you know, I am not relgious. I presume that excludes me from your non-existent debate?
Christian Man said:Trying to attach labels to me does nothing but stifle debate. Your 'uncandidness' is starting to wear.
Everyone has ethics and societal value beliefs regardless if they are religious or not. For instance, let me ask you a straight question, do you think murder is a good societal value or a bad one or does it depend on the situation? A simple question, I hope you can answer.
Christian Man said:I'm done wrangling with your jibber jabber. It's easy to debate if you don't have to give your own opinions and can attack at will without flack but the problem is your too transparent for being such a closed off person. I guess you're the only person in the world that doesn't have an opinion on if murder is a good or bad thing. lol...
Christian Man said:I do know the Christian composition, does that appease you?
The Palestinian Christians are Palestinians who follow Christianity. They make up 1.6% population of Palestine, according to Bernard Sabella. Prior to the establishment of the state of Israel, approximately 10% of Palestine's population was Christian.
Christian Man said:Left wing and related idealogy states that various societal values and ethics will 'protect' those followers, in fact name one thing you believe that doesn't have a facet of protection either hidden or blatant about it.
The agenda of my thread is to point out cleansing from the middle east. Nino, your prejudice blinds you as if this were a story about Native Americans or Aboriginals and their culture/religion being displaced and replaced you would not be so antagonistic. Why?
Christian Man said:Left wing and related idealogy states that various societal values and ethics will 'protect' those followers, in fact name one thing you believe that doesn't have a facet of protection either hidden or blatant about it.
The agenda of my thread is to point out cleansing from the middle east. Nino, your prejudice blinds you as if this were a story about Native Americans or Aboriginals and their culture/religion being displaced and replaced you would not be so antagonistic. Why?
Open Bethlehem is a civil society initiative established to respond to the state of emergency in Bethlehem as the wall is going up turning a city that resonates with millions of people around the world into a 21st century prison.
http://www.openbethlehem.org/
It hasn't.Ninjaboy said:
surely it's a bad thing that people are leaving the middle east cos they are'nt allowed to practice their religion
i don't have any time for religious wankers of any faith, but i don't see how this has turned into a 'have a pop at christians' thread
The National Post is sending shockwaves across the country this morning with a report that Iran's Parliament has passed a law requiring mandatory Holocaust style badges to identify Jews and Christians.
But independent reporter Meir Javdanfar, an Israeli Middle East expert who was born and raised in Tehran, says the report is false.
http://www.940news.com/locale.php?news=2512
Christian Man said:If Christians being displaced, made to pay higher taxes, and wear special badges isn't persecution then you might as well come out and say it, you're a Nazi.
http://www.canada.com/components/print.aspx?id=11fbf4a8-282a-4d18-954f-546709b1240f&k=32073
Iran was an incipient democracy in 1953, but Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh -- chosen by an elected parliament and hugely popular among Iranians -- angered the West by nationalizing his country's oil industry. President Eisenhower sent the CIA to depose him. The coup was successful, but it set the stage for future disaster.
The CIA placed Mohammed Reza Pahlavi back on the Peacock Throne. His repressive rule led, 25 years later, to the Islamic Revolution. That revolution brought to power a clique of bitterly anti-Western mullahs who have spent the decades since working intensely, and sometimes violently, to undermine U.S. interests around the world.
If the Eisenhower administration had refrained from direct intervention against Iran in 1953, this religious regime probably would never have come to power. There would be no nuclear crisis. Iran might instead have become a thriving democracy in the heart of the Muslim Middle East.
http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_3844343
Bernie Gunther said:Might be worth mentioning again here that the story about Iran making non-muslims wear special badges turned out to be bullshit from the neo-con propaganda mill known as Benador Associates and published by one of Conrad Black's dodgy newspapers.
Yuwipi Woman said:Spot on.
I've never understood why having differing ideas means you can't get on.
Christian Man said:I do know the Christian composition, does that appease you?
The Palestinian Christians are Palestinians who follow Christianity. They make up 1.6% population of Palestine, according to Bernard Sabella. Prior to the establishment of the state of Israel, approximately 10% of Palestine's population was Christian.