Shayler - talk in Brixton - Wed. 2nd Nov.
- Thread starter TeeJay
- Start date
DaveCinzano
WATCH OUT, GEORGE, HE'S GOT A SCREWDRIVER!
you back to putting words in people's mouths, teejay? or are you defending gosling?
have you ever spoken to gosling? or been in contact with him by other means? just to clarify, you understand
have you ever spoken to gosling? or been in contact with him by other means? just to clarify, you understand
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Yeah, who you assume aren't...
We've yet to look into it.
We've yet to look into it.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
No on else did because it's not there.TeeJay said:
Did you or did you not write this:
"...which would still leave 95% who aren't."
Are you going to edit all your posts by the time we wake up again?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
That's your post - however RnB is asking for evidence of the other 95% (the evidence for the 5% having already been furnished) - which was, most defintely, not followed by a question mark. Good day.TeeJay said:
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Indeedie do. See above.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Hang on, 5% of the green Party being Loons was your guess TeeJaaY not mine. So why are you getting on your high horse about me repeating you?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Oh i see, now you find my culture intolerable? Calling Dr Mengeles.
It's only a few short steps TTEJ
It's only a few short steps TTEJ
DaveCinzano
WATCH OUT, GEORGE, HE'S GOT A SCREWDRIVER!
teejay said:
so - let's get this straight - your theory to make sure dodgy agenda'd nutters like gosling don't get to be seen as the face of the greens is to... do nothing, and hope enough non-dodgy agenda'd, non-nutters just happen to join the party to dilute the effect of the dodgy agenda'd nutters..?
marvellous
like i say, i have no interest in the green party.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
No you muppet, that came after your guess and me deciding to take you at your word, after all you wouldn't have just came to the 5% with no serious research at all would you? WOULD YOU?TeeJay said:So it was my guess?
"the evidence for the 5% having already been furnished"
You really are a brain-addled fuckwit, aren't you?
This post:
5% of them?
...which would still leave 95% who aren't.
http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=3768052&postcount=512
You absolute sucker
So you think there should be a purge?bristle-krs said:so - let's get this straight - your theory to make sure dodgy agenda'd nutters like gosling don't get to be seen as the face of the greens is to... do nothing, and hope enough non-dodgy agenda'd, non-nutters just happen to join the party to dilute the effect of the dodgy agenda'd nutters..?
marvellous
like i say, i have no interest in the green party.
What exactly is Gosling's agenda? [ps I will do a search to see if there are any threads about this already]
I *am* arguing that tolerating 'nutters' is better than having an excessively authoritarian and centralised party where anyone who goes off message or is a bit odd gets thrown out.
I don't really like all this shite, but if you have a 'radical' party which is positioning itself slightly outside the mainstream the is it any surprise that you attract a certain number of oddballs and people with wierd ideas?
While I would prefer that this wasn't the case, I can live with it as long as the bulk of the party have their heads screwed on and as long as the policies remain in the right place.
I think that tolerating the oddballs is better than starting to throw people out over expressing relatively trivial and harmless views.
You may argue that TG is not trivial or harmless. I am willing to listen to what you have to say about him. If it is bad and extreme enough then I would agree that he should be asked to leave the GP. At the moment I couldn't really say either way.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
IDIOT! Come on. cap it up.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Read that. Of course i would guess.TeeJay said:I wouldn't take a guess without "serious research"?
Oh do shut up, you idiot.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
I've not quoted hegel at anyone, um..paranoid pot boy...
DaveCinzano
WATCH OUT, GEORGE, HE'S GOT A SCREWDRIVER!
TeeJay said:
still trying to put words in people's mouths, then.
there's no real point in you talking about this until you've actually done the reading.
you also haven't replied to my questions.
You haven't provided any links.bristle-krs said:
I might get round to doing a search for 'gosling', but how hard is it for you to just say exactly what your problem with him is?
I don't get the impression that you would support the Green Party anyway - gosling or no gosling - so maybe there is no point talking to you about this either? You say you don't care. What exactly is your point then?
As for your questions...
...they must have been a bit vague, but I am even less inclined to bother re-reading this thread to find them when you try to do your best impression of Jeremy Paxman.
The problem (or one of the problems with) with Tony Gosling is that he posted on indymedia, pretending to be Class War, when he is not, and never has been anything to do with the Class War Federation.
His thread "The Class War MI5 Files" by Class War was a straight forward act of disinformation.
Gosling has pushed the "Class War was propped up by MI5" line ever since, even though David Shayler himself abandoned it at the Conway Hall debate he had with larry O'Hara this summer.
His thread "The Class War MI5 Files" by Class War was a straight forward act of disinformation.
Gosling has pushed the "Class War was propped up by MI5" line ever since, even though David Shayler himself abandoned it at the Conway Hall debate he had with larry O'Hara this summer.
Similar threads
