Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

[Thu 10th Nov 2011] Spaces of Capital, Moments of Struggle (London, WC1H 0XG)

love detective

there's no love too small
Some of the sessions from this look excellent, but the whole thing seems a bit in danger of being an academic wankfest, with prices to deter anyone out of academia from attending - still looks interesting though - shame it's such a fucking insular thing

-----------------------------------------
The ongoing popular uprisings in the Arab world, alongside intimations of a resurgence in workers' struggles against 'austerity' in the North and myriad forms of resistance against exploitation and dispossession across the globe make it imperative for Marxists and leftists to reflect critically on the meaning of collective anticapitalist action in the present.

Over the past decade, many Marxist concepts and debates have come in from the cold. The anticapitalist movement generated a widely circulating critique of capitalist modes of international 'development'. More recently, the economic crisis that began in 2008 has led to mainstream-recognition of Marx as an analyst of capital. In philosophy and political theory, communism is no longer merely a term of condemnation. Likewise, artistic and cultural practices have also registered a notable upturn in the fortunes of activism, critical utopianism and the effort to capture aesthetically the workings of the capitalist system.

The eighth annual Historical Materialism conference will strive to take stock of these shifts in the intellectual landscape of the Left in the context of the social and political struggles of the present. Rather than resting content with the compartmentalisation and specialisation of various 'left turns' in theory and practice, we envisage the conference as a space for the collective, if necessary, agonistic but comradely, reconstitution of a strategic conception of the mediations between socio-economic transformations and emancipatory politics.For such a critical theoretical, strategic and organisational reflection to have traction in the present, it must take stock of both the commonalities and the specificities of different struggles for emancipation, as they confront particular strategies of accumulation, political authorities and relations of force. Just as the crisis that began in 2008 is by no means a homogeneous affair, so we cannot simply posit a unity of purpose in contemporary revolutions, struggles around the commons and battles against austerity.

The conference is organised around two plenary sessions (the Deutscher lecture by David Harvey and the launch of the Socialist Register 2012), two HM plenaries (on politics and the people, and the Arab uprisings) and panels in parallel sessions dedicated to
specific themes and debates.

The conference is self-funded and we will depend on voluntary donations by attendants and participants to support the organisation and running of the event. Pre-registration is highly recommended. The cost is £50 for waged and £15 for unwaged participants. The suggested donation on the door is £75 for waged and £35 for unwaged. A day ticket is £20. A separate ticket is needed for the David Harvey Deutscher lecture (£3 pre-bought, £5 on the door).

For logistical and other support, Historical Materialism would like to thank the School of Oriental and African Studies. For their collaboration, thanks to the Faculty of Law and Social Sciences at SOAS, Brill Academic Publishers, the Deutscher Memorial Prize committee and Socialist Register

Full programme of sessions
 
£15 unwaged for the whole thing doesn't seem too bad - anyone else going? Could have a U75 meet up?
 
It's £25 unwaged on the door btw. That's pretty much 30% of weekly income. I wonder what 30% of some of the other speakers (never mind attenders) income would be? Pity as there's some really good looking stuff.
 
I'm meant to be chairing a session on strategies for fighting the cuts/austerity - not speaking as such. I might actually defer to someone else, as my local anti-cuts group has a debate with local Labour councillors on that Saturday which I'd like to go and put my twopenneth into as well.
 
It's £25 unwaged on the door btw. That's pretty much 30% of weekly income. I wonder what 30% of some of the other speakers (never mind attenders) income would be? Pity as there's some really good looking stuff.
Yes but £15 in advance. I think they should do a "single session for £2.50" or something.
 
I'm meant to be chairing a session on strategies for fighting the cuts/austerity

there's probably about 4 other sessions on at the same time that to me would be above your one in terms of interest in!

no reflection on your one, just that there seems to be loads of good stuff on (most of it not in the slightest of use to anyone, but interesting from a hobby/interest point of view - which is probably the best way to treat/approach these kind of academic events)
 
At least ours has a practical focus :p but you're more interested in academic stuff?! Make your mind up. To be honest there's always stuff on there to get you thinking.
 
but i don't see events like that overall as having much (or any) practical focus or worth in the first place - so as i said be as well to just approach them from a hobby/interested in type view, rather than hold any illusions in them being part of a struggle or process of change (it's completely the wrong terrain for anything like that) - it's just a bunch of insular academic types talking to each other which happens to be in an area i'm interested in and am very much on the outside looking in on

I don't even mean though that the topics themselves are irrelevant, just made irrelevant in the hands of those who professonalise and gatekeep/exclude others from them and detach them off into bubbles that they never venture out from - there's far too much separation of this stuff from everything else and while events like this are interesting I do think they do more to perpetuate that problem rather than resolve it

I've never been to an academic conference in my life though so the novelty value of that along with interest in the themes/topics means I'll probably go along anyway despite knowing instinctively they are not a good thing in the way they are done (but i guess the problem is much bigger than this, in terms of academic/professionalisation etc..)
 
I don't see what the song and dance is about really. It's one sort of a discussion which has a relevance in its own - limited - sort of a way. I'm not really sure who's claiming otherwise.
 
No chance of filming the speakers and putting it up online I suppose? A few US universities do that now (e.g. this one on the Chinese economy). Even if hosting yourself would be impossible surely they could be banged up on a Youtube channel?
 
"Spaces of Capital, Moments of Struggle "

The titles of these events always make me chuckle. It's like when you see a band name and you can automaticlly tell what style of music they play without listening to a note. I knew this would involve David Harvey somewhere along the line. Someone should create one of those 'random name generators' that are all over the net.

A few suggestions;

"Particularties in the Dialectic"
"Movements of Contradtiction"
"The Social Integument and Labour"
"Dynamics of Accumulatory Value"

:D
 
You'll be glad you didn't - been here 5 minutes and want to kill everyone in the face already
if you go to anything organised by historical materialism and can stand 5 minutes before wanting to mow them all down with an ingram mac 10 then you've a fuck of a lot more patience than i.
 
these people are not normal

the two RMF sessions that I went to were reasonable in terms of the topics & the speakers (and given the topics the audience weren't that bad either) - but was surprised at the fairly mediocre level in terms of analysis. Didn't take anything away from them that was new or interesting or refreshing, but didn't disagree with much of it either. But still was interesting in terms of showing that you can get to a position of understanding of this stuff outside the academic sphere that is no less solid/comprehensive, with the benefit of not being subsumed by the academic process itself, which I think leaves you with a much sharper and relevant perspective than those from inside the process have

I was left feeling numb after the evening plenary session though, the fusion of the left and academia at its worst, delusions of relevance and desperately scrambling for ways in which to make themselves relevant. The whole day I had the general feeling that I was on the outside looking in, however the plenary session thing made it clear that it is left academia that is on the outside looking in and that's a position they are more than comfortable to be in
 
Back
Top Bottom