No doubt super-loaded Golfrate will have their legal team working on ways to get around this.That's fucking brilliant! Will it reopen now as it was?
Nope -the leaseholder sold the remaining years on the lease back to Golfrate. They won't want to run a pub so it will now sit empty until some kind of planning goes through. The licence will also have reverted to Golfrate so they will be able to amend it to a regular pub use with regular hours making it easier to argue that regular pub use will not be a nuisance to neighbours.That's fucking brilliant! Will it reopen now as it was?
I'm not sure why you're so confident given that they already own at least one working pub in the area. Surely there's a possibility that may change if a financially agreeable proposal comes their way (given the rather emphatic nature of Lambeth's refusal)?They won't want to run a pub so it will now sit empty until some kind of planning goes through. ?
I doubt they see the recent refusal as anything more than a short term obstacle so probably won't be looking to get a new pub tenant in until they have planning and have refurbed the building. A short term tenant will probably be more hassle that it is worth to them.I'm not sure why you're so confident given that they already own at least one working pub in the area. Surely there's a possibility that may change if a financially agreeable proposal comes their way (given the rather emphatic nature of Lambeth's refusal)?
They almost always win in the end, but I am slightly heartened by the contents of Lambeth's planning refusal.The developers will win unfortunately if they go for the old line about providing more new homes.
They almost always win in the end, but I am slightly heartened by the contents of Lambeth's planning refusal.
I think the argument for 1 is more likely to be that pubs don't generally have the owners or staff living on top any more. The landlord didn't live there I don't think and someone mentioned that the rooms were let out anyway.Point number 1 is easy to get around - advertise it at the top end of the going rate, make it look totally bad value for money - no-one will want it.
The developers will have a row of suited booted men when it comes to the appeal who will have an answer for everything.
He did live there, as did some of his staff.I think the argument for 1 is more likely to be that pubs don't generally have the owners or staff living on top any more. The landlord didn't live there I don't think and someone mentioned that the rooms were let out anyway.
Certainly not any more so than live music. We're negotiating for a permanent space at the moment though, so hopefully won't have to bother. Also, I very much doubt golfrate would be up for it.Crispy - would the big room be any use as a temporary site for Makerspace or would that be too noisy?
I thought cuppa mentioned it - must me misremembering. Even so - I think that might be an argument to allow existing accommodation to become self contained.He did live there, as did some of his staff.
They haven't exactly got a reputation as being the most community minded of developers.Certainly not any more so than live music. We're negotiating for a permanent space at the moment though, so hopefully won't have to bother. Also, I very much doubt golfrate would be up for it.
Good luck. I look forward to hearing more!Certainly not any more so than live music. We're negotiating for a permanent space at the moment though, so hopefully won't have to bother. Also, I very much doubt golfrate would be up for it.
Wasn't the pub inevitably going to shut down anyway when the luxury flats opposite are built and the residents starting moaning? Or is that another pub?
The "Agent of Change" principle sounds broadly sensible - though quite difficult to prove in practice, for instance, e.g. if a sound system were beefed up / respositioned / turned up.Seems to be happening in a few places according to this article:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-28838947
What about that Brixton East place?I phoned up Golfrate today because I'm still looking for a venue for the NYE party we've held at the Grosvenor for the last three years - any suggestions very welcome! - and the guy there told me that they would be putting in a new application to Lambeth. I asked when he thought the pub would reopen, and he said they weren't planning to reopen as a pub - that the building would be "put to retail". I think that's the phrase he used. I assume he means sold to another developer.
So if you have any suggestions for venues for our NYE party, please say!
The "Agent of Change" principle sounds broadly sensible - though quite difficult to prove in practice, for instance, e.g. if a sound system were beefed up / respositioned / turned up.
This was posted on B Buzz by a reader on the 19th Aug:I phoned up Golfrate today because I'm still looking for a venue for the NYE party we've held at the Grosvenor for the last three years - any suggestions very welcome! - and the guy there told me that they would be putting in a new application to Lambeth. I asked when he thought the pub would reopen, and he said they weren't planning to reopen as a pub - that the building would be "put to retail". I think that's the phrase he used. I assume he means sold to another developer.
So if you have any suggestions for venues for our NYE party, please say!
Golfrate have already sent a surveyor in to measure the Grosvenor ground floor for “retail”.
If they get planning permission for the flats it’ll be a Tesco Metro in no time.
It's not a club venue.What about that Brixton East place?
The Wikipedia page of Gofrate owner Asif Aziz seems to paint a very different picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asif_AzizAsif Aziz, the property magnate who owns the Trocadero, is being sued for $20m over claims that he defrauded a Lebanese businessman once alleged to be involved with the trade in African "blood diamonds".
Aziz is accused of illegally ramping the price of Golfrate Africa and Ovlas Trading, two Angolan food manufacturing businesses he sold in 2005, just before he bought the Trocadero, a vast building on London's Piccadilly Circus that houses shops, restaurants, a cinema and Funland, an indoor fairground.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/.../Trocadero-owner-sued-for-20m-over-fraud.html
I'm not sure why you're so confident given that they already own at least one working pub in the area. Surely there's a possibility that may change if a financially agreeable proposal comes their way (given the rather emphatic nature of Lambeth's refusal)?
With the landlord already gone, it's far too late, I fear.just wondered whether this might be of any use to interested parties?...The Ivy House in Nunhead was the first pub to be listed as a community asset, and a listing as such means that the community gets first shout at making an offer to own the asset.
http://www.ivyhousenunhead.com
a possibility for The Grosvenor? I guess it could be too late.