Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Have kids and receive benefts? Jobcentre now 'trialling' referral to social services

Single parent attends the Jobcentre and gets referred to social services as a troubled family:

https://thepoorsideoflife.wordpress...roubled-family-new-trial-at-ashton-jobcentre/

The criteria for classification as a 'troubled family' is especially worrying:


"They are classing single parents and couples with children who aren’t in full time employment as troubled families if they fall into two categories on the list. This is very easy to do. For instance one category is being unemployed another category is having an illness or your child having an illness. If they agree [in the trial phase, it's 'optional'] to comply with this scheme they will be watched and monitored by social services and a social services case worker until they find employment."

This is being trialled at Ashton Jobcentre in Tameside - population 45,000. Considering the population size, the trial has a very large compulsory target* figure - 1,750 families:


"The council have approved a new investment agreement approach to working with *a minimum of 1,750 families. This won’t only affect single parents it will affect couples with children as well. Here’s their target figure, they have to reach this target. The government provides a fee called the attachment fee £1000 per family.Encouraging the local authority to engage with families, it then provides a result fee which is £800 per family, which is provided by the government to an agency who are working with that family. This agency it has been decided will be a local housing trust. New Charter Housing. They did not allow any other outside agency to apply and they made a special exemption for this.

And given how far up the agenda of the government's street this is, I'd expect to see this rolled out across the country eventually. Currently optional but that fact is unlikely to be made obvious to claimants - a tactic seen all too regularly before now.
 
More "coming for the undeserving poor" ........
Yet more attempts to force people to stop claiming benefits to which they should be entitled. (Another way to "massage" statistics ........)

So, are we really "All in this together" - not in my book !
 
That's not a new scheme. It's been recognisably around since about 2010, they've just progressively dropped the bar of "troubled families" - originally it was "the worst 100,000 families" who had a bunch of indicators. Because of the splendid success that was (most LAs wasted an incredible amount of time and resource trying to pull together their lists), they've included more people/families. It's also, for the avoidance of doubt, not a Tory scheme, the background work and research was started in 2009 under Labour.
 
Last edited:
is self appointed, pompous, reactionary, shit-bag for hire Lousie Casey anything to do with this?
 
That's the badger. Hadn't realised what it'd become but yeah, stems from her stuff/appointment in 2011 that was built on the prep work that was done in 2009/10. Obviously it moved away from the well intentioned "life event" focus it had to "get the fuckin' proles off benefits".
 
Any family that has kids is inviting trouble on themselves :D I seriously earn my child tax credits and family allowance in the pain and anxiety that my teenager is causing me right now. In fact I'd go as far to say that they're not paying me enough for it :mad:
 
No because you're not suffering a detriment, you're being referred for "help" and "support". Apparently. It'd go to judicial review normally but that's been made more difficult too, iirc.
 
Single parent attends the Jobcentre and gets referred to social services as a troubled family:

https://thepoorsideoflife.wordpress...roubled-family-new-trial-at-ashton-jobcentre/

The criteria for classification as a 'troubled family' is especially worrying:


"They are classing single parents and couples with children who aren’t in full time employment as troubled families if they fall into two categories on the list. This is very easy to do. For instance one category is being unemployed another category is having an illness or your child having an illness. If they agree [in the trial phase, it's 'optional'] to comply with this scheme they will be watched and monitored by social services and a social services case worker until they find employment."

This is being trialled at Ashton Jobcentre in Tameside - population 45,000. Considering the population size, the trial has a very large compulsory target* figure - 1,750 families:


"The council have approved a new investment agreement approach to working with *a minimum of 1,750 families. This won’t only affect single parents it will affect couples with children as well. Here’s their target figure, they have to reach this target. The government provides a fee called the attachment fee £1000 per family.Encouraging the local authority to engage with families, it then provides a result fee which is £800 per family, which is provided by the government to an agency who are working with that family. This agency it has been decided will be a local housing trust. New Charter Housing. They did not allow any other outside agency to apply and they made a special exemption for this.

And given how far up the agenda of the government's street this is, I'd expect to see this rolled out across the country eventually. Currently optional but that fact is unlikely to be made obvious to claimants - a tactic seen all too regularly before now.

Jesus. I've been involved with the Troubled Families initiative. Recently, the criteria have been broadened (it used to depend on a child having a certain percentage of unauthorised absences at school combined with other vulnerabilities in the family) to encompass a larger demographic. The support workers are paid by results (note, not necessarily social workers if the family doesn't meet the risk and need thresholds for statutory intervention) and... (the key point)... can only work with a family if consent is obtained.

This undermines the whole consent foundation. Family support interventions can only work when they are truly collaborative. I would predict there will now be a slew of inappropriate referrals where families either don't really need support but are trying as best they can to keep their heads above water and will tell our screening/assessment workers that "we've been told to do this or they'll stop our money". :facepalm:

Mind you, the referral should go no further if the family says fuck off. But how will that refusal be recorded, and will the DWP use that non-engagement as a basis for sanctioning? :hmm:
 
It's about frightening people, not about truly getting services involved.

The shameless bastards.

or it might just be about covering DWP / JCP arse in the light of the the assorted recent scandals meaning that Paedo panic/ slipped through the cracks / vilify Soc Serv is the topic du jour ...
 
or it might just be about covering DWP / JCP arse in the light of the the assorted recent scandals meaning that Paedo panic/ slipped through the cracks / vilify Soc Serv is the topic du jour ...
So they're doing this in case the jobcentre gets blamed for Jimmy Savile?
 
So they're doing this in case the jobcentre gets blamed for Jimmy Savile?

same as the schools and violent video games stuff , to cover their arses 'becasue we referred to Social Services' in the next Rotherham style grooming scandal thingy
 
Back
Top Bottom