BigTom
Well-Known Member
There are two programmes on tonight about the ATOS disability assessment process, which it would be really good to publicise, especially the channel 4 dispatches one, which has a doctor going undercover to find out about the process, this is on at 8pm tonight, and has led to the story about ATOS targets to find 89% of people fit for work:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jul/27/disability-benefit-assessors-film?CMP=twt_fd
http://benefitscroungingscum.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/q-when-is-target-not-target-when-its.html
is a really good, balanced article discussing the targets.
then at 8:30pm, Panorama has a program about the same - not sure about this, the title is dodgy and the BBC don't have a great record when it comes to disability stuff but this telegraph article suggests at least it will highlight the injustice of it with a story about a man with a heart condtion found fit for work having been advised by his assessor to seek urgent medical advice, who died from a heart attack five weeks later
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...s-sending-sick-and-disabled-back-to-work.html
I think it's important that people who have not experienced or heard about this process, or who do not understand that it is such a failure, should see the dispatches program, and possibly the panorama one, though I might regret saying that later tonight.
I'm sure there will be discussion here about them both, probably over a couple of threads..
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jul/27/disability-benefit-assessors-film?CMP=twt_fd
Secret filming of training given to doctors recruited by the private company Atos to assess whether sickness and disability benefit applicants are fit for work suggests that staff are monitored to ensure they do not find excessive numbers of claimants eligible.
...
The trainer tells trainee assessors: "If it's more than I think 12% or 13%, you will be fed back 'your rate is too high.'" When Bick questioned how the company could know in advance the precise proportion of people who needed to be put in this category, the trainer replied: "How do we know? I don't know who set the criteria but that's what we are being told."
Bick asked: "So if we put 20% in, we would get picked up on?". He was told by the trainer that, in that scenario, his cases would be reviewed.
http://benefitscroungingscum.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/q-when-is-target-not-target-when-its.html
is a really good, balanced article discussing the targets.
then at 8:30pm, Panorama has a program about the same - not sure about this, the title is dodgy and the BBC don't have a great record when it comes to disability stuff but this telegraph article suggests at least it will highlight the injustice of it with a story about a man with a heart condtion found fit for work having been advised by his assessor to seek urgent medical advice, who died from a heart attack five weeks later
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...s-sending-sick-and-disabled-back-to-work.html
Despite the assessor telling Mr Hill to seek urgent medical advice, he was still found fit for work. In the meantime doctors had diagnosed him with heart failure.
He won his appeal but he was ordered to attend another assessment.
"He got a letter for another medical and I couldn't believe it," said Mrs Hill. "He'd got to go for a medical when he was waiting for a heart operation."
But he was again declared fit for work, with the assessor declaring: "Significant disability due to cardiovascular problems seems unlikely."
Mr Hill died of a heart attack five weeks later.
I think it's important that people who have not experienced or heard about this process, or who do not understand that it is such a failure, should see the dispatches program, and possibly the panorama one, though I might regret saying that later tonight.
I'm sure there will be discussion here about them both, probably over a couple of threads..