BigTom
Well-Known Member
ok, so it's never going to happen, but being too young for the poll tax non-payment campaign I'd still like to talk about it because it's about the only action I can think of that will stop this cut from happening.
If you don't know, council tax benefits are being localised and changed to council tax support payments, with a cut of 10% in the budget. Different councils are finding different ways to apply this cut, and consultation is happening now.
http://birminghamagainstthecuts.wor...uts-the-latest-attack-on-low-income-families/
I'm not sure if it's the council or central government but in Birmignham at least pensioners are not going to be affected by this, and the council here say they wil protect the most vulnerable (without really going into detail obviously). The average cost of this will be £224/year to a household - around £4/week which is a lot of money for anyone on benefits.
It's such a small sum of money that I wonder if it's financially worth councils chasing people for it, how much is it going to cost to take someone through the courts for a couple of hundred pounds? Birmingham already has hundreds of millions of pounds of council tax outstanding - including 16 councillors
So I feel like there's a fair chance that at a practical level, monies owed from this won't get chased if people don't pay it, and if there's a campaign that goes alongside that it'd make it more likely that the cut would actually be reversed (although also more likely people would get taken through courts as well I suppose, since central government won't want to be seen to be letting people get away with it, even if councils decide to turn a blind eye), and could be a useful point of resistance to welfare reforms.
Comparisons with poll tax non-payment campaign are obvious.. big differences I can see are that this cut only affects a minority of people, and that group of people are claiamants and thus scroungers etc. in the eyes of many which makes wider public support more difficult and so with many people unnaffected by this it would obviously be harder to get to the critical mass needed.
But I'm still interested in hearing how the poll tax non-payment campaign came about, and how people think they'd go about trying to make a campaign for CTB cuts happen. With Lletsa off the boards perhaps we can steer away from complete pessimissm and cynicism even though clearly such a campaign is not going to happen.
If you don't know, council tax benefits are being localised and changed to council tax support payments, with a cut of 10% in the budget. Different councils are finding different ways to apply this cut, and consultation is happening now.
http://birminghamagainstthecuts.wor...uts-the-latest-attack-on-low-income-families/
I'm not sure if it's the council or central government but in Birmignham at least pensioners are not going to be affected by this, and the council here say they wil protect the most vulnerable (without really going into detail obviously). The average cost of this will be £224/year to a household - around £4/week which is a lot of money for anyone on benefits.
It's such a small sum of money that I wonder if it's financially worth councils chasing people for it, how much is it going to cost to take someone through the courts for a couple of hundred pounds? Birmingham already has hundreds of millions of pounds of council tax outstanding - including 16 councillors
So I feel like there's a fair chance that at a practical level, monies owed from this won't get chased if people don't pay it, and if there's a campaign that goes alongside that it'd make it more likely that the cut would actually be reversed (although also more likely people would get taken through courts as well I suppose, since central government won't want to be seen to be letting people get away with it, even if councils decide to turn a blind eye), and could be a useful point of resistance to welfare reforms.
Comparisons with poll tax non-payment campaign are obvious.. big differences I can see are that this cut only affects a minority of people, and that group of people are claiamants and thus scroungers etc. in the eyes of many which makes wider public support more difficult and so with many people unnaffected by this it would obviously be harder to get to the critical mass needed.
But I'm still interested in hearing how the poll tax non-payment campaign came about, and how people think they'd go about trying to make a campaign for CTB cuts happen. With Lletsa off the boards perhaps we can steer away from complete pessimissm and cynicism even though clearly such a campaign is not going to happen.