In prepared remarks, Corbyn said: “Our Jewish friends are no more responsible for the actions of Israel or the Netanyahu government than our Islamic friends are responsible for Islamic State.”
Didn't seem very stressed or flustered there. Looked rather comfortable in fact.
And of course, saying 'islamic states' (check for yourselves, that is what he actually says) means Saudi, Iran etc
It's only one line yet there are numerous errors in that transcription, pieces missing and words changed. Great stuff Guardian.Just came here to post that.
That is absolutely desperate stuff.
Not actually controversial at all. Note that comments are turned off on the article.
He isn't comparing Israel to ISIS, he's comparing the relative responsibility of British Jews and Muslims to entities which commit human rights abuses in their name.
Interesting line here for the commentariat to push, do they realise that no one in the Labour Party (unless they hate him already) is going to be swayed by this obvious lying?
It's on youtube. I can't see much wrong with it.
Note that comments are turned off on the article.
yeah, it's even got "various" before it so it's no that ambiguousDidn't seem very stressed or flustered there. Looked rather comfortable in fact.
And of course, saying 'islamic states' (check for yourselves, that is what he actually says) means Saudi, Iran etc
It's not in the slightest bit ambiguous I'd say... the new meaning is just 100% made up by the guardian.yeah, it's even got "various" before it so it's no that ambiguous
No, you're right but I suppose some West Wing style staff of millions might have come up with a form of words that didn't put Islam and state anywhere near each other just in case.It's not in the slightest bit ambiguous I'd say... the new meaning is just 100% made up by the guardian.
I keep hearing strong rumours that everyone at the guardian hates dogs, anyone else hear that?
That's for next week.they've ceased to give a shit about the truth now. They'd call him a peadophile if they thought they could pay the libel costs
That is not funny.I keep hearing strong rumours that everyone at the guardian hates dogs, anyone else hear that?
cant remember who posted it but its looking increasingly prescientWow that's a fantastic statement. Is it me or does he look more like a leader since the coup was launched than he did before? He's like a vampire that feeds on the hatred of Blairites.
That's for next week.
It's hard to imagine how else they can escalate the current hysteria. I don't think I've ever hated anything or anyone in my life as much as these 'journalists' hate Corbyn.
I was verbally attacked by a Momentum activist and Jeremy Corbyn supporter who used traditional antisemitic slurs to attack me for being part of a ‘media conspiracy’. It is beyond belief that someone could come to the launch of a report on antisemitism in the Labour Party and espouse such vile conspiracy theories about Jewish people, which were ironically highlighted as such in Ms [Shami] Chakrabarti’s report, while the leader of my own party stood by and did absolutely nothing. People like this have no place in our party or our movement and must be opposed. Until today I had made no public comment about Jeremy’s ability to lead our party, but the fact that he failed to intervene is final proof for me that he is unfit to lead, and that a Labour Party under his stewardship cannot be a safe space for British Jews.
From the graunid, what does this even mean? Why isn't this statement more specific? Is it because it's one of a long series of lies?