Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Blacklisted builders launch mass legal action against Sir Robert McAlpine

TremulousTetra

prismatic universe
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/...g-association-mcalpine-building?newsfeed=true
I'd preferr to see a working class action, but I do sincerely hope they win this.
Workers blacklisted by theconstruction industryover more than three decades have launched a high court claim against industry giant Sir Robert McAlpine, the Tory donor and builder of the Olympic Stadium, for conspiring with other firms to keep them out of work.
The workers allege that the company, which also worked on widening the M1 motorway, was involved in an unlawful conspiracy to amass a database of information against thousands of people, which was used to prevent them earning a living in their trade. The claim involves 86 of 3,400 workers in the files of the Consulting Association, a covert organisation paid by big names in the industry to collect damaging information on workers regarded as leftwing or troublesome. The files included information about trade union membership, relationships, friendships and political views, along with surveillance intelligence.
The value of the initial claim for loss of earnings and damages is estimated to be around £17m, but many more of the victims are expected to add their names to the action in the coming months, raising the potential claim against the construction industry to about £600m, according to one source.
Sir Robert McAlpine, which was paid £50m to help build London's Olympic Stadium, was served nine days ago with legal papers alleging it was one of the "construction companies which had subscribed to the database – which involved inter alia the wrongful gathering, storage and use of information concerning trade union activities and in particular the making of decisions as to whether or not the claimants should be employed".
Sir Hugh Tomlinson, principal QC for alleged victims of the phone-hacking scandal which closed down the News of the World, is representing the workers allegedly robbed of their livelihoods by Sir Robert McAlpine and others.
The Consulting Association, a clandestine organisation funded by major names in the construction industry, was run by Ian Kerr for more than 30 years. Its database was seized nearly three years ago, but the extraordinary nature of the information it held only fully emerged following a recent employment tribunal for one of the victims, Dave Smith, 46, an engineer who had a 36-page file against his name and was repeatedly victimised for highlighting safety hazards on sites, including the presence of asbestos.
The Information Commissioner's Office said at Smith's tribunal that it believed some of the information held by the covert organisation and accessible to companies that subscribed to the service "could only have been supplied by the police or the security services".
The Observer understands that, as part of the legal claim against Sir Robert McAlpine, which donated £100,000 to the Conservative party in 2008-09, the victims' solicitors, Guney, Clark & Ryan, have obtained a court order to visit the Information Commissioner's Office over the next few days and take away unredacted files recovered from the offices of the Consulting Association in 2009.
A source said the information could also form the basis of a civil claimagainst the police for their alleged involvement with the blacklisting. The victims are also compiling a file to accompany a complaint to the Independent Police Complaints Commission about what they claim was collusion with the Consulting Association.
One of the workers involved in the legal action, Mick Abbott, 73, a father of four who lives in Wigan, said the file held on him by the Consulting Association included information on his trade union activities from the 1960s up to 2006, leaving him unable to find a job in the industry since 1985.
"This nearly ruined my marriage and it meant that my children were on free meals at school," he said. "My file goes back to 1964 and the last entry says that I rekindled the campaign for justice for the Shrewsbury picketers in 2006. They have been watching me all these years and passing this information around, blighting my life over four decades. I had to become self-employed and go into work with my sons fitting kitchens."
Smith, whose tribunal formed a key turning point in the victims' campaign, said that his earnings had gone from about £36,000 in 1999 to just £12,000 before tax in 2001 amid an economic boom because he was suddenly blackmarked by the industry for his work as a health and safety officer on sites. He said: "This is about justice. People's lives have been ruined. I had to leave the industry because of this, as did many others."
Sean Curran, of Guney, Clark & Ryan, said: "We have seen evidence that suggests our clients were the subjects of unwarranted blacklisting within the UK construction industry. We can confirm that formal legal proceedings have been issued on behalf of those workers who believe that they suffered as a consequence of their inclusion on the Consulting Association database. It remains our intention to offer all necessary legal support to those who feel that their ability to obtain employment has been affected by what has taken place."
Labour MP John McDonnell, who has been supporting the victims, said the rejection by prime minister David Cameron of his appeal for a public inquiry suggested he was "more interested in protecting employers than getting to the truth for the victims".
A spokesman for Sir Robert McAlpine said: "As legal proceedings have been issued it would be inappropriate for Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd to make any comment at this stage."
 
Cheers s&s

Protest against Balfour Beatty, 10am Friday 24 August 2012

Balfour Beatty Engineering Services HQ, Lumina Building, 40 Ainslie Road, Hillington Park, Glasgow, G52 4RU
 
Hmmm. Doubt i'll be able to attend Glasgow on a friday at 10am when I have work. In London.

Surely the unions should be unilaterally attacking this? Would make more sense than a few people kicking about with slogans on lollipop sticks.
 
Not sure if that makes sense. :D

Surely the unions should have a unilateral position on this, and attack it?

better? :D
 
Blacklist Support Group Report on Ian Kerr - loads more at the link, just a few bits that jumped out:

“One revelation after another today as convicted blacklister Ian Kerr broke his silence today and gave nearly 4 hours worth of evidence to the Scottish Affairs Select Committee investigation into blacklisting.

Among the more jaw dropping evidence:

  • Kerr has been a full-time blacklister since 1969 – previously employed by the Economic League before he became the Chief Executive of the Consulting Association.
  • Cullum McAlpine – Director of several companies within the Sir Robert McAlpine group was the first Chairman of the Consulting Association after providing a £10,000 start-up loan following the demise of the Economic League.
  • Consulting Association meetings took place in the Sir Robert McAlpine London HQ
  • Sir Robert McAlpine paid Ian Kerr’s £5,000 fine, soliciotors fees, and costs associated with closing the organisation including redundancy money for the 4 staff to the order of £25,0000 in order to keep McAlpine’s name out of the scandal.
 
Well it would have been more convenient if he had died before giving evidence to the select committee.

I'm just trying to watch his performance now. Its not the easiest video to sit through because his voice was weak and badly picked up by the mic.

I have just made it to a bit where he discusses one of his roles being to visit radical bookshops where he could get fringe publications, anarchist literature etc, and also subscribed to socialist worker, the socialist, and labour research. It seems he found this aspect of his job rather interesting.
 
Some of the companies were particularly hard-nosed with the information he supplied. As he came to understand this he started to withhold some information where only a partial, and quite possibly inaccurate, identification of the person was made. Companies he took this approach with were Balfour Beatty companies and Skanska.
 
Well I managed to sit through his entire performance. He really seemed to enjoy talking about it.

His death doesnt seem like quite such a fatal blow to getting to the truth for a number of reasons:

  • He already said a lot and named quite a few names
  • His wife appears to know a fair bit
  • The Information Commissioners Office have got the records they took from his company and these form the basis of much of the current legal action.
  • He was an employee of the company, there are other people who acted as Chairman, attended its meetings etc
  • Apart from his press clippings service, he says he wasnt gathering any evidence about people himself, just collating names & details supplied by the main contacts (usually top HR people) at the companies who used his service.
  • The stuff about attending public meetings to gather intelligence, and information flowing to and from branches of the police, relates to the previous entity the Economic League, and he was only one of many cogs in that machine, eg he says he wasnt the one that had meetings with police.
  • He destroyed almost all the records & paperwork associated with the company, so any further evidence he could provide would have been from memory. eg Any copies of minutes of meetings that still exist will be ones he sent to the construction comapnies, he destroyed his copies.
Having said that, one of the main problems with his death is if any other witnesses contradict stuff he said.

Random piece of evidence that made me wiggle my eyebrows:

He said that when the ICO came with a warrant and took away his files, one of the ICO people who attended expressed surprise that the database operation hadnt been moved overseas years earlier!
 
Thats true, but all the same I dont think his version of events is completely beyond the realms of possibility.

I obviously dont know the truth, but it does seem plausible that his operation was mostly to share the data between different companies, with the companies themselves gathering the 'intelligence' about workers. This would make some sense based on a large amount of the data coming from events on the construction sites themselves, the resources of those large companies, and the contacts that the HR people at the companies probably had. He augmented it with stuff read in the radical and not so radical press. And he had the older data from the Economic League which was clearly far more of a direct information-gathering operation.

Of course it is possible that there was more to his operation than that, but there does not need to be in order to explain how the system worked and provided a service that is no less sinister as a result. And he did mention how the construction industry is built on networking, including with their opposite numbers in the unions, and with the police. Plus the era in which his own entity was operating was after the time when the most radical left-wing stuff was seen as a far greater threat than it is today.

In any case his performance was largely free of regret, and he was able to shield his own mind from the possibility that he ruined peoples lives by going on about how there were plenty of companies that didnt subscribe to his system, so blacklisted people could still find work at one of those companies :facepalm:
 
One opportunity that select committee mised to pick at the edges of his story does not directly relate to the topic of this thread. He had files on environmental activists that could cause trouble at construction sites, and they did not ask him how this data was obtained. They also failed to probe deeply as to what was discussed at the various meetings his company organised for members. He revelaed that the group focussed on the environmentalists was called the Woodstock group (groan!) and that the ICO didnt take away the files about those people.

Anyway on the basis of what he said I imagine that committee will be keen to grill a variety of senior HR people, although its quite possible to imagine them not getting very far.

Is there much stuff out there that managed to take a closer look at the activities of the Economic League back in the day?
 
Back
Top Bottom